Francis Spurzheim Craig

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by elmore 77 View Post
    Hi,congratulations to Wynne on the book,if it's as good as his comments are here,it'll be well worth a look,I'm looking forward to it. Reading Craigs divorce petition on the Telegraph website,it says that Elizabeth was seen entering a house late at night with a young man with all the implication of that.Did I read that this was what had happened to Tumblety,and that this was the source of his hatred of women? I find it amazing that it happened once but here we are(if I remember correctly) with two suspects telling a similar story
    I too expect it to be good read, I just wish he was going to bring evidence not speculation.

    If he has an exhumation order for DNA testing, well do the testing then bring out the book, not the other way around.

    Leave a comment:


  • elmore 77
    replied
    Hi,congratulations to Wynne on the book,if it's as good as his comments are here,it'll be well worth a look,I'm looking forward to it. Reading Craigs divorce petition on the Telegraph website,it says that Elizabeth was seen entering a house late at night with a young man with all the implication of that.Did I read that this was what had happened to Tumblety,and that this was the source of his hatred of women? I find it amazing that it happened once but here we are(if I remember correctly) with two suspects telling a similar story

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    It's a shame you've gone I'm sure people on here might have a few questions to ask over the next few weeks .

    Leave a comment:


  • RockySullivan
    replied
    Originally posted by Prosector View Post
    Hi Sally and others. I am going to withdraw from the Message Boards for a bit until after the book is published and in the bookshops and people have had a chance to read it it in full. However, a couple of quick comments - Craig and EWD were married on Christmas Eve 1884 so definitely before MJK appeared in the East End. I have no way if verifying if the premises mentioned by Craig in the Petition were actually brothels but there seems to be no doubt that Ellen Macleod did run brothels and had some sort of connection with these addresses (or possibly the private detectives didn't do a very good job in identifying them). The Monmouth Hotel and Coffee House in Drummond Street was a tall multi-storey building and premises of that kind did often serve as a front for brothels. One problem is that Craig was talking about the year 1885, mid way between censuses so they may have changed hands several times in that period.

    Wynne
    You should stick around man, I remember seeing your posts on the torso killer and being impressed I hadn't realized you were the one doing the book. Hey even if your Kelly wasn't your aunt you still tried and that's what counts

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by Sally View Post
    9 Marcellus Road and 80 Orpingley Road were both cited by Francis Craig as brothels in the occupation of Ellen McLeod in 1885
    Hi Sally
    Does it actually give the name 'Ellen' somewhere in the petition? I thought it said Mr Mc Leod all the way through but may have missed a name being given. If so, that would answer one of my earlier questions about how WWD made the link between the property owner, Mrs Mc Leod, mentioned in the divorce and Helen McLeod nee Maundrell.

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    Originally posted by Prosector View Post
    Hi Sally and others. I am going to withdraw from the Message Boards for a bit until after the book is published and in the bookshops and people have had a chance to read it it in full. However, a couple of quick comments - Craig and EWD were married on Christmas Eve 1884 so definitely before MJK appeared in the East End. I have no way if verifying if the premises mentioned by Craig in the Petition were actually brothels but there seems to be no doubt that Ellen Macleod did run brothels and had some sort of connection with these addresses (or possibly the private detectives didn't do a very good job in identifying them). The Monmouth Hotel and Coffee House in Drummond Street was a tall multi-storey building and premises of that kind did often serve as a front for brothels. One problem is that Craig was talking about the year 1885, mid way between censuses so they may have changed hands several times in that period.

    Wynne
    Good bye look forward to speaking to you soon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sally
    replied
    Hi Wynne

    Thanks - the only thing I'd add is that 53 Tonbridge Street, also cited by Craig certainly seems to have been a brothel. I located a press report from 1889 [IPN 3rd August] concerning the prosecution of a John Hennessey for running a 'disorderly house' [that old euphemim] It wasn't Hennessey's first fine for this offence and on this occasion he was fined £40 - no mean sum.

    He said his landlord lived in Watford. I think that possibly 53 Tonbridge Street had been a brothel for some years, as I found a series of adverts starting in around 1873 for young, single women/girls with experience of the private hotel business.

    The coffee house/private hotel business was rife with prostitution and I think that was common knowledge. Legitimate adverts of the tiem for coffee house staff often make specific reference to duties, closing times etc. - presumably to make it clear to any potential applicants that they wouldn't be working as prostitutes.
    Last edited by Sally; 08-09-2015, 06:29 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Prosector
    replied
    Hi Sally and others. I am going to withdraw from the Message Boards for a bit until after the book is published and in the bookshops and people have had a chance to read it it in full. However, a couple of quick comments - Craig and EWD were married on Christmas Eve 1884 so definitely before MJK appeared in the East End. I have no way if verifying if the premises mentioned by Craig in the Petition were actually brothels but there seems to be no doubt that Ellen Macleod did run brothels and had some sort of connection with these addresses (or possibly the private detectives didn't do a very good job in identifying them). The Monmouth Hotel and Coffee House in Drummond Street was a tall multi-storey building and premises of that kind did often serve as a front for brothels. One problem is that Craig was talking about the year 1885, mid way between censuses so they may have changed hands several times in that period.

    Wynne

    Leave a comment:


  • Sally
    replied
    Ah, so it was in multiple occupancy then. I saw that in 1911 - probably divided into flats.

    Even less room for a brothel. Unless of course, it was partially occupied by Ellen McLeod by 1884.
    Last edited by Sally; 08-09-2015, 05:37 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    The Orpingley Rd one had a policeman living there in 1881.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sally
    replied
    9 Marcellus Road and 80 Orpingley Road

    9 Marcellus Road and 80 Orpingley Road were both cited by Francis Craig as brothels in the occupation of Ellen McLeod in 1885

    In 1885, 9 Macellus Road was occupied by William George Laws, an Optical Turner. Laws was married to Mary Jane 'Jenny' [nee Lomax], who was born in Ireland and they had two young children, Alicia Jane and William at the time.

    80 Orpingley Road - originally cited as 40 Orpingley Road but amended by Francis Craig to 80 in the divorce petition dated 8th March 1886 - was occupied from at least 1881 by William Luker, a Lath Render, his wife Isabella [nee Whinham] and their four young children, William, David, Matilda and Ada.

    Houses on both Marcellus and Orpingley Road were mainly in multiple occupancy by 1911, as let rooms, apartments and flats. Looking at those which were in single occupancy, they look as though they were originally 3 bedroom houses, probably with 2 ground floor rooms and a kitchen.

    I don't know how Craig's claim that these houses were operating as brothels works with the surviving documentary evidence relating to these properties. Both houses seem to have been occupied by working men and their young families in 1885.

    Craig gave an address at Mile End Road during the divorce proceedings, but the electoral rolls show that he was not registered at that address [as pointed out by Ed on JTRF]. Presumably Craig was able to use the address at Mile End Road, which I believe was the office of the East London Advertiser at the time, as a correspondence address at the least. Perhaps he wanted his divorce to be a discreet affair.

    There are a lot of questions here, I think
    Last edited by Sally; 08-09-2015, 04:34 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • RockySullivan
    replied
    I thought granger was covered in tattoos and earrings doesn't sound like blotchy ?

    Did anyone else notice how many similar usernames we have here? Craig H, Jonathan G, John G, Jerry D, Harry D, Phil h, michael H, the good michael, the bad michael, the ugly michael etc...is it a gag?

    Dammit this was meant for the grainger thread

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by jmenges View Post
    And if some of these questions are not explained in the book, I will be asking the author this Sunday when he sits down with myself, Paul Begg and Robert McLaughlin for a panel discussion for Rippercast. So I'm keeping an eye on these threads.

    JM
    We still won't have read the book by then JM! But I'd like to know if there's any proof the Maundrell/McLeod's were living at 28 Collingham Place before 1890? I suspect they were at Edwardes Square, Kensington until 1890, where a Miss Maundrell and Miss Leigh Hunt were advertising a French speaking Kindergarten and Preparatory school in 1885 ( at the site of a previously established school run by a Miss Tattershall, so all very innocent, to me) and Charles Maundrell had a studio 1887-1890. Part of Wynne's case is, I believe, that there are no adverts for a school at 28 Collingham Place, but there wouldn't be if the school was a Edwardes Square?
    Directories and electoral registers show electricical design engineer and family man ( he had a baby boy in 88) James Edward Henry Gordon was at 28 Collingham Place from 1883 to 1890 but I couldn't see anyone else listed there. And would the Gordons want to stay there for so long if it was a brothel?!

    Leave a comment:


  • miss marple
    replied
    It is a very interesting hypothosis, as there do seem to be a number of connections between MK's back story and parts of EWD's life. Her Davies, name, her welsh background, west end life, the knowledge of Scots guards at the Londonderrys, brother Johnto, could all be poured into the mix in the process of reinventing herself, but there is another side of MK, the irish side.

    We know MK had lodged with Mrs Buki round about 84 and the McCarthys at Breezers Hill in 85 so she was in the EastEnd before the marriage of EWD but [I am just throwing an idea into the mix] supposing EWD did come to Whitechapel and met a prostitute called Mary Kelly and appropriated some of her story and her name? I am refering to our friend the prostitute, Mary Kelly inmate of the Whitechapel infirmary in 1881 resident of castle ally. Just suppose Flemming and Morganstone was her history. Buki and the M'Cathys did not know the later MK, just the earlier one. The body was too multilated to identify properly, no photos of MK, the people who knew her earlier would just know the name.
    For such a myth maker as EWD she would have to have acquired the irish story from some where.

    I am not convinced that Craig did four murders before killing his wife, It does not feel right. If he just killed MK to obliterate her that makes more sense. He seems too old at 50 but I am intrigued enough to want to read the book. EWD seems an interesting charactor in her own right.

    Miss Marple

    Leave a comment:


  • drstrange169
    replied
    When it comes to the autumn of 1888, one private detective springs to mind. He and his partner being quite prominent in Berner Street;-)

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X