I first read about the case via Patricia Cornwell's Case Closed when I was twelve or thirteen (thanks to a true crime buff grandmother), but my real adult interest in Jack The Ripper was only fueled by reading Mr. Gordon's The American Murderers Of Jack The Ripper on Severin Klosowski. As a result, I have (what is very possibly) an irrational bias towards demonstrated murderers for the case, though I do not actually favor any of them for the role of murderer in the Ripper crimes. This feeling of mine extends also to the criminally violent against women more generally.
I think William Bury is a very good suspect, and whose prospects would greatly improved with a proven link to Whitechapel.
I think James Kelly is a good to very good suspect, but I want to know exactly where he was in August to December of 1888. I think this can be done, and will eventually be found out.
I am less impressed by Thomas Cutbush.
I think William Grant Grainger is a GREAT suspect, and Goddammit but we need more information on this man. To my knowledge there has not been a single suspect book published about the man; not a single 'name' in Ripperology has taken it upon themselves to make him into a pet suspect. This is a fellow we know who (A) attacked a prostitute with a knife and (B) targeted the abdominal area in doing so. I'd do it myself, but I'm American and do not have any sort of professional training as a historian or archivist and no idea how to begin. Are we seriously going to let Goddamn Lyttleton Forbes Winslow have the last word on this character? I am appealing to your sensibility as someone who knows how to do these things, whoever you areroduce more information on Grainger for us.
Grainger is the guy of the named suspects I like as the Ripper the most, though I do not think he actually was. I admit that he did not target the throat first, either for strangulation or for cutting, as the Ripper must have done, and for this reason he probably was not the Ripper. But we absolutely must know more about him.
I think William Bury is a very good suspect, and whose prospects would greatly improved with a proven link to Whitechapel.
I think James Kelly is a good to very good suspect, but I want to know exactly where he was in August to December of 1888. I think this can be done, and will eventually be found out.
I am less impressed by Thomas Cutbush.
I think William Grant Grainger is a GREAT suspect, and Goddammit but we need more information on this man. To my knowledge there has not been a single suspect book published about the man; not a single 'name' in Ripperology has taken it upon themselves to make him into a pet suspect. This is a fellow we know who (A) attacked a prostitute with a knife and (B) targeted the abdominal area in doing so. I'd do it myself, but I'm American and do not have any sort of professional training as a historian or archivist and no idea how to begin. Are we seriously going to let Goddamn Lyttleton Forbes Winslow have the last word on this character? I am appealing to your sensibility as someone who knows how to do these things, whoever you areroduce more information on Grainger for us.
Grainger is the guy of the named suspects I like as the Ripper the most, though I do not think he actually was. I admit that he did not target the throat first, either for strangulation or for cutting, as the Ripper must have done, and for this reason he probably was not the Ripper. But we absolutely must know more about him.
Comment