Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Suspect battle: Cross/Lechmere vs. Hutchinson

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Columbo
    replied
    Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
    shame on you..

    forget about me, go and try to build a case against a mad jew ...

    or maybe against an american quack...

    or a sailor who traveled to argentina...

    or a cricket player whom after a month of kelly's murder thought he was going to be like his mum and threw himself in the water...

    thats better for you
    Actually I think people have already done that. It doesn't make them right.

    Most of the one's you mentioned were considered suspects at the time. Charles Lechmere wasn't.

    Keep trollin'. I'm sure most posters here have forgotten you as you asked.

    Columbo

    Leave a comment:


  • Columbo
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Well
    Also Hutch was engaging in stalking behavior, had no real excuse for being there, and conveniently shows up right after the inquest is over.

    He makes a much better suspect than lech imho.
    The stalking behavior never occurred to me. Excellent point.

    Columbo

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
    shame on you..

    forget about me, go and try to build a case against a mad jew ...

    or maybe against an american quack...

    or a sailor who traveled to argentina...

    or a cricket player whom after a month of kelly's murder thought he was going to be like his mum and threw himself in the water...

    thats better for you


    Rainbow,

    instead of hurling insults and making accusations, why not just answer the question I asked you?

    Or is it the comment posted by Columbo true,

    no reply will assume so and so will everyone else I am sure


    bye


    Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
    shame on you..

    forget about me, go and try to build a case against a mad jew ...

    or maybe against an american quack...

    or a sailor who traveled to argentina...

    or a cricket player whom after a month of kelly's murder thought he was going to be like his mum and threw himself in the water...

    thats better for you
    Well where do the three minutes come from.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rainbow
    replied
    shame on you..

    forget about me, go and try to build a case against a mad jew ...

    or maybe against an american quack...

    or a sailor who traveled to argentina...

    or a cricket player whom after a month of kelly's murder thought he was going to be like his mum and threw himself in the water...

    thats better for you

    Leave a comment:


  • Pcdunn
    replied
    "Grasshopper" Rainbow has the conviction of youth, and thinks the television film has explained it all, I venture to say. I think the chances he/she has read any of the original sources regarding Cross/ Lechmere are very slim.

    The three-minute blocks of time may have come from the Lechmere documentary or perhaps from some of Fisherman's writings on this forum.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
    I see now where your and others problem comes from..

    It is not Lechmere found a body on his way to work..

    Its Paul who found a body and a man standing by this body on his way to work....

    that makes all the difference......
    No Lechmere did find a body on the way to work. Paul later joined Lechmere in looking at the body. You can't convict a man merely for finding a body and looking at it. Nothing whatsoever suggests Lechmere was JTR.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Columbo View Post
    She/He's not going to tell you. by the tone of his/her posts I would bet this is a JTR troll trying to get people riled up. Same old stuff we've seen in other threads ad nauseum.

    There are two parallels for Lechmere and Hutchinson in my opinion. They both allegedly lied about something in their statements. Lechmere (to some) may have lied about his name. Hutchinson (I believe) lied about Astrakhan man. He knew the victim and places himself there late at night not too long before the estimated time of death.

    The reason I think he lied about Astrakhan man is the standard. too many details in too short a time in minimal lighting. Couple that with the fact no one else reported seeing him. The cops with Hutchinson in tow, couldn't locate him and he was dropped immediately from the investigation.

    Columbo
    Well
    Also Hutch was engaging in stalking behavior, had no real excuse for being there, and conveniently shows up right after the inquest is over.

    He makes a much better suspect than lech imho.

    Leave a comment:


  • drstrange169
    replied
    Charles Lechmere is a person of interest but, yet again, we see people distorting the known evidence to elevate him to suspect status.

    What two sets of three minutes?

    Where and when did Paul specifically say he didn't hear footsteps?

    If Mrs Nichols was bleeding when the two carmen examined her, why didn't they say so?

    If Xmere was standing "where the body was" why did Paul say he "went with him" to look at the body?

    The quote cited in post 469 is an excerpt from The Lloyds Weekly, an article known to be an incorrect version of what happened that night.

    If we are to believe that particular article, then we have to accept Xmere did not lie to PC Mizen, as Paul claimed he was the one that spoke to Mizen.

    Lechmere is interesting as a potential suspect, but the theory falls over every time someone tries to cherrypick a case against him.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by Columbo View Post
    She/He's not going to tell you. by the tone of his/her posts I would bet this is a JTR troll trying to get people riled up. Same old stuff we've seen in other threads ad nauseum.

    There are two parallels for Lechmere and Hutchinson in my opinion. They both allegedly lied about something in their statements. Lechmere (to some) may have lied about his name. Hutchinson (I believe) lied about Astrakhan man. He knew the victim and places himself there late at night not too long before the estimated time of death.

    The reason I think he lied about Astrakhan man is the standard. too many details in too short a time in minimal lighting. Couple that with the fact no one else reported seeing him. The cops with Hutchinson in tow, couldn't locate him and he was dropped immediately from the investigation.

    Columbo

    I agree wit you on every point including that rainbow will not say.


    steve

    Leave a comment:


  • Columbo
    replied
    Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
    and what the hell do you want a killer to say huh ?!

    that I was mutilating her when I heared Paul approaching, so I pulled the dress down over the wounds and stood up ?!

    There was no way to hunt a serial kilker at that time till you catch him red handed, no suspect ever will come even close to Lechmere from this aspect, he was standing by a freshly bleeding and recently murdered woman, not finishing his mutilation, and Paul didn't hear him walking.

    not saying that he gave a different name too.

    and you want us to believe in Druitt guilt or kosminski ... those poor persons that have nothing connecting them to any murder what so ever

    Nichlos must have spoken to the murderer, there were at least 3 minutes communication before the sudden attack of Lechmere which last for another 3 minutes minimum, then 3 minutes till Paul come close... and she was still bleeding by the feet of Lechmere...
    Read the other threads and you'll be more informed. They didn't know they were hunting a multiple murderer.

    Columbo

    Leave a comment:


  • Columbo
    replied
    Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
    Hi Rainbow,

    in post 462 you gave some very clear timings for the murder of Nichiols, I asked how you came to these conclusions?

    you have not answered,

    So I ask again where do you get the timings from? or have you simply invented them?


    Steve
    She/He's not going to tell you. by the tone of his/her posts I would bet this is a JTR troll trying to get people riled up. Same old stuff we've seen in other threads ad nauseum.

    There are two parallels for Lechmere and Hutchinson in my opinion. They both allegedly lied about something in their statements. Lechmere (to some) may have lied about his name. Hutchinson (I believe) lied about Astrakhan man. He knew the victim and places himself there late at night not too long before the estimated time of death.

    The reason I think he lied about Astrakhan man is the standard. too many details in too short a time in minimal lighting. Couple that with the fact no one else reported seeing him. The cops with Hutchinson in tow, couldn't locate him and he was dropped immediately from the investigation.

    Columbo

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Sorry hadn't seen that Steve was already onto the three minutes times three.
    Hi GUT,

    no problem i don't think Rainbow wants to answer.


    Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Sorry hadn't seen that Steve was already onto the three minutes times three.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
    and what the hell do you want a killer to say huh ?!

    that I was mutilating her when I heared Paul approaching, so I pulled the dress down over the wounds and stood up ?!

    There was no way to hunt a serial kilker at that time till you catch him red handed, no suspect ever will come even close to Lechmere from this aspect, he was standing by a freshly bleeding and recently murdered woman, not finishing his mutilation, and Paul didn't hear him walking.

    not saying that he gave a different name too.

    and you want us to believe in Druitt guilt or kosminski ... those poor persons that have nothing connecting them to any murder what so ever

    Nichlos must have spoken to the murderer, there were at least 3 minutes communication before the sudden attack of Lechmere which last for another 3 minutes minimum, then 3 minutes till Paul come close... and she was still bleeding by the feet of Lechmere...
    Where do you get all these three minute blocks from.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X