The BIG Poll

[Herlock Sholmes]

By the way, have you managed to prove any of Richards Evidence is made up, or lies as you claimed .? Hmmmm no i didnt thinks so . But you just keepi slinging that mud and personal attacks .

Try reading the threads Fishy and not just picking bits that you like. It’s impossible to discuss the case with someone that hasn’t bothered to read anything on the subject and who hasn’t even followed the thread. Richard’s point have been rebutted. His claim that Thompson was living 100 metres from the site of the murders, at the time of the murders, has been proven untrue. Richard’s claim that Thompson was Smith’s suspect has been proven untrue. That Thompson carried knives has been shown to have been untrue. That Thompson was violent has been shown to have no basis in fact.

How have you missed these and others? Pay attention.

[Lewis C]

By the way, have you managed to prove any of Richards Evidence is made up, or lies as you claimed .? Hmmmm no i didnt thinks so . But you just keepi slinging that mud and personal attacks .

Henry Smith said his suspect gave women polished farthings instead of sovereigns. Francis Thompson found a couple of coins in the street. Richard claims that this this is a match. I don't want to call it a lie either, but is there any way that this can be considered a plausible claim?

Also, it's provably false that Thompson within 100 meters of all of the murder sites. We know that's false because the Nichols and Eddowes murder sites are more than 200 meters apart, so it isn't even possible for anyone to have lived within 100 meters of every murder site.