The BIG Poll

[Herlock Sholmes]

With arms and legs and not blind

[JohnSAJR]

Hi Herlock, my tuppence worth.

1. The man seen with Mary Kelly by Mrs. Kennedy outside the Brittania at 3am - that's if Kennedy was correct and Kelly is a Ripper victim.
2. Henry Tomkins.
3. Jacob Levy.
4. William Bury.
5. Edward Buckley.
6. Montague Druitt.
7. William Grainger/Grant/Green.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Cheers John

[FISHY1118]

I’m quite happy to explain further why you are wrong Fishy but could you do it in one of the Thompson threads please and could you perhaps, just for once, use the evidence and not just the ‘Patterson version.’

I'll give you the heads up Herlock, Patterson version is the evidence .

[Doctored Whatsit]

I'll give you the heads up Herlock, Patterson version is the evidence .

That's a cracker! It's the way you tell 'em!

[FISHY1118]

That's a cracker! It's the way you tell 'em!

Evidence Richard used to to back up his claim for Thompson As JtR .What exactly Doc has you confused . ?

[Doctored Whatsit]

Evidence Richard used to to back up his claim for Thompson As JtR .What exactly Doc has you confused . ?

My only confusion is that you haven't read, or have ignored the numerous responses that so many people have made.

[FISHY1118]

My only confusion is that you haven't read, or have ignored the numerous responses that so many people have made.

Which youve just done , Congratulations ,you proved my point , Confusion with a Capitol 'C'

[Doctored Whatsit]

Which youve just done , Congratulations ,you proved my point , Confusion with a Capitol 'C'

I think we need to return to the subject of this thread, and leave Thompson on the numerous threads created for him.

[FISHY1118]

[Herlock Sholmes]

Evidence Richard used to to back up his claim for Thompson As JtR .What exactly Doc has you confused . ?

That you haven’t bothered to check. You just swallow what Richard tells you hook, line and sinker. Just like you’re the only person in the world that hasn’t realised that the Knight/Sickert theory is a proven invention.

[Herlock Sholmes]

My only confusion is that you haven't read, or have ignored the numerous responses that so many people have made.

Don’t expect Fishy to discuss the details of evidence Doc. All that Fishy ever does is to pick a side. Usually based on something personal, like whether he gets on with the poster or not, then when asked a specific id question he either ignores it, changes the subject or says that the question has been answered.

Try it, ask him a question on the details of the subject. I guarantee that he won’t give a proper answer.

[Doctored Whatsit]

Don’t expect Fishy to discuss the details of evidence Doc. All that Fishy ever does is to pick a side. Usually based on something personal, like whether he gets on with the poster or not, then when asked a specific id question he either ignores it, changes the subject or says that the question has been answered.

Try it, ask him a question on the details of the subject. I guarantee that he won’t give a proper answer.

No, I'll give it a miss - this thread is already untidy with irrelevancies!

[Herlock Sholmes]

These boards are currently being spammed by one poster imo. (Not Fishy btw)

[FISHY1118]

That you haven’t bothered to check. You just swallow what Richard tells you hook, line and sinker. Just like you’re the only person in the world that hasn’t realised that the Knight/Sickert theory is a proven invention.

By the way, have you managed to prove any of Richards Evidence is made up, or lies as you claimed .? Hmmmm no i didnt thinks so . But you just keepi slinging that mud and personal attacks .