If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Sorry, but I genuinely don't have a real suspect! Nothing that I have seen steers me with any confidence towards truly suspecting any single individual. I recognise possibilities, persons of interest certainly, but no convincing suspect. If the truth ever does come out, I think it may well be someone we've never heard about.
Hi Doc,
If the poll were asking us to rank persons of interest rather than suspects, would you then be able to make list? In my discussion of the case, I tend to not distinguish between the two, though technically, there's a difference. All of my suspects are probably more properly called persons of interest rather than suspects.
I have a suggestion for the tabulation of the results: if 2 suspects have the same number of points but one was mentioned on more ballots than the other, rank the one on more ballots ahead of the other.
I have a suggestion for the tabulation of the results: if 2 suspects have the same number of points but one was mentioned on more ballots than the other, rank the one on more ballots ahead of the other.
Good suggestion Lewis. I’ll go with that.
In cricket we have the Duckworth Lewis method of deciding the result of a game that’s been cut short by rain. This one is just The Lewis Method.
Comment