The BIG Poll

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Herlock Sholmes
    Commissioner
    • May 2017
    • 23282

    #76
    Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

    So what your saying is by reading , analyzing, studying , and forming an opinion on post that Richard put forward in regards to Thompson as a suspect, isn't actually "looking at the evidence " ? Not sure i follow that kind of logic your peddling there Herlock.

    If only you could have considered the evidence he posted at the very least to its possibilities instead of totally dismissing it, its would be impossible not to support it .
    I really can’t see why you aren’t getting this point Fishy. Richard has made his points and so have I. You can see how we differ. So the only way to form a valid opinion is to look at the original evidence itself and see which one of us is giving a truthful representation of the facts. We can’t both be right Fishy. And it’s not only me Fishy, others on here have posted how Richard has manipulated the evidence. Surely that should make you suspicious…and no…it’s not a matter of interpretation…it’s a matter of truth. Richard claims things as facts…

    That Thompson was definitely staying in London at the time of the murders - this is proven an untrue statement by evidence and I have shown how he has managed to make this false claim.

    That Thompson was an arsonist - this ludicrous claim has been exposed by revealing the three ‘incidents’ upon which it was blamed by Richard (no one at the time)

    That Thompson was violent - this is nonsense as Richard is trying to claim that works of fiction are proof that someone is violent. We don’t have a single piece of evidence of Thompson ever being violent in any way.

    That Thompson was Smith’s suspect (claimed as a fact by Richard) - categorically disproved. We even have the statements of the actual police officers who arrested the man. He was Oswald Puckeridge.

    His biographer Walsh said that around mid-October he was admitted to hospital and stayed for around 6 weeks. If accurate then this eliminates him as the murderer of Mary Kelly.

    That his incarceration matched the cessation of the murders - utter nonsense. The evidence tells us that he was out of hospital some time in December and free to murder.

    That he was searching for his prostitite girlfriend in Whitechapel - he never mentions doing this and why would he? She was a West End prostitute.

    That he resented/hated her for abandoning him - nonsense. He never wrote of her or spoke of her but with kindness and love.

    Thompson cannot be considered a suspect as it’s just another example of someone who was ‘around at the time.’ The fact that Richard refuses to answer questions is proof that he has no answers. He’s been caught out.

    Herlock Sholmes

    ”I don’t know who Jack the Ripper was…and neither do you.”

    Comment

    Working...
    X