Interesting Thread Regarding Anderson's Suspect.

[Fiver]

Just your opinion tgat it's unsafe. Same old.

His definition of "unsafe" appears to mean "disagrees with his theory".

[Geddy2112]

Swanson's notes are the ultimate, indisputable foundation of truth, untouchable, irrefutable, and the closest thing to absolute authority on anything Jack the Ripper related. To doubt them is to embrace ignorance, to challenge them is to wage war against historical certainty itself.

But he does not name Lechmere or Cross and that was your boy last week. Welcome aboard the Jack the Ripper Merry-go-round, last stop Lechmere, next stop Kosminski...

[Trevor Marriott]

Just your opinion tgat it's unsafe. Same old.

and its the same old people rejecting the obvious facts which I have highlighted

It's a shame you don't know about how police investigations are carried out in major crimes

www.trevormarriott.co,uk

[Tom_Wescott]

I just want to point out there is nothing wrong with Finch or anybody testing out ideas on the forums. That's what they're for and nobody loses any money. Unfortunately, there's a bunch of thieves out there with Amazon accounts, so we can't be willy nilly about what we share any more and trust that it won't be stolen and published before we can make a proper study and work of it. Anything worthwhile these days has to be done on the downlow.

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

[The Rookie Detective]

I just want to point out there is nothing wrong with Finch or anybody testing out ideas on the forums. That's what they're for and nobody loses any money. Unfortunately, there's a bunch of thieves out there with Amazon accounts, so we can't be willy nilly about what we share any more and trust that it won't be stolen and published before we can make a proper study and work of it. Anything worthwhile these days has to be done on the downlow.

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

Thank you kindly Tom

You're absolutely right, and you sum it up much better than I ever could.



To all...


I've had some amazing advice on this, and I am extremely humbled and appreciative that I have the opportunity to potentially make a positive impact, through the support and guidance of those who clearly care about the integrity of the case.

The reality is; that while I am desperate to just flood the forums with new data; I also want to ensure I have as much accuracy and truth in what I present.
When the time comes, I will try and ensure that I am in the best position to promote my theory, but at the same time will openly welcome all feedback; whether positive or negative; because I can't expect to make such a claim, and then not expect the heat from that.

As things stand, I am quite literally waiting for physical documents to arrive through the post, that will enhance my theory to the point I can look to begin submitting some data.

Until then, i can only apologise for any delay, but rest assured that when the time comes, we can all benefit from the data I have collated.

Whether my theory is then liked or despised; the data itself is good and hopefully will be worth the wait to some of you at least.


Warmest regards to you all


Chris






P.s. Tom, i quite like you mentioning "Finch"...so here goes...






Warmest regards to you all


The Finch
(a.k.a. Rookie D)