Barnaby: Fisherman,
I found your post in #249 to be incredibly insightful.
Hooray!!! Caz just told me that it would not be worth reading, plus that it pointed out that I lacked a life. Things are looking up, I must say!
To be completely redundant with him but given others aren't addressing the issue, the acoustics potentially allowed both Cross and Paul to hear each other from far off. First, we know Paul heard nothing until he was basically on the scene.
Itīs actually worse - he did not hear anything at all, until he suddenly saw Lechmere standing in the middle of the street. He could have stood there since Thursday morning for all Paul knew.
That must mean Cross had been there for at least a little while, no?
Yes, it goes a fair way to prove that, actually, at least to my mind. Keep in mind that Paul lived in Foster Street, running into to Bath Street, the route Lechmere would in all probability have used. And Paul lived some thirty, forty yards up Foster Street, so IF Paul had been just thirty, forty yards behind Lechmere, then he seemingly would have been so for a stretch of perhaps 250-300 yards, without the two seeing or hearing each other throughout. Also keep in mind that Lechmere claimed to have left Doveton Street at 3.20 or 3.30. It would have taken him 6-7 minutes to reach Browns Stable Yard, so he should have been there at 3.26 - 3.37, and not at 3.45.
This means that we have a time gap of 8-19 minutes to explain. The same time gap is the potential time frame in which Lechmere would have chatted up Nichols, followed her into Buckīs Row, punched her in the face, strangled or very nearly strangled her, and then cut away at her.
It was only after that Paul arrived, many minutes after Lechmere.
Second, if Cross were innocent, upon first hearing footsteps, wouldn't he go to seek help in that direction?
I would. You would. Caz perhaps wouldnīt. She couldnīt be arsed to put the question to herself.
What I liked most about the post, however, was the portrayal of Cross as an improviser, not a maximizer. That is, he wasn't a robot calculating the odds of being apprehended based on various strategies that he could employ. He heard someone approaching who may actually be a witness and in the few moments he had initiated a highly malleable plan of action.
All we have on him speaks of a man who thought very quickly on his feet, and who provided solutions as best as he could as he went along. Some solutions were decidedly risky, but he was forced to make such decisions anyway. So he improvised, just like you say.
Thanks for you kind words, Barnaby - much, much appreciated, I can assure you.
All the best,
Fisherman
I found your post in #249 to be incredibly insightful.
Hooray!!! Caz just told me that it would not be worth reading, plus that it pointed out that I lacked a life. Things are looking up, I must say!
To be completely redundant with him but given others aren't addressing the issue, the acoustics potentially allowed both Cross and Paul to hear each other from far off. First, we know Paul heard nothing until he was basically on the scene.
Itīs actually worse - he did not hear anything at all, until he suddenly saw Lechmere standing in the middle of the street. He could have stood there since Thursday morning for all Paul knew.
That must mean Cross had been there for at least a little while, no?
Yes, it goes a fair way to prove that, actually, at least to my mind. Keep in mind that Paul lived in Foster Street, running into to Bath Street, the route Lechmere would in all probability have used. And Paul lived some thirty, forty yards up Foster Street, so IF Paul had been just thirty, forty yards behind Lechmere, then he seemingly would have been so for a stretch of perhaps 250-300 yards, without the two seeing or hearing each other throughout. Also keep in mind that Lechmere claimed to have left Doveton Street at 3.20 or 3.30. It would have taken him 6-7 minutes to reach Browns Stable Yard, so he should have been there at 3.26 - 3.37, and not at 3.45.
This means that we have a time gap of 8-19 minutes to explain. The same time gap is the potential time frame in which Lechmere would have chatted up Nichols, followed her into Buckīs Row, punched her in the face, strangled or very nearly strangled her, and then cut away at her.
It was only after that Paul arrived, many minutes after Lechmere.
Second, if Cross were innocent, upon first hearing footsteps, wouldn't he go to seek help in that direction?
I would. You would. Caz perhaps wouldnīt. She couldnīt be arsed to put the question to herself.
What I liked most about the post, however, was the portrayal of Cross as an improviser, not a maximizer. That is, he wasn't a robot calculating the odds of being apprehended based on various strategies that he could employ. He heard someone approaching who may actually be a witness and in the few moments he had initiated a highly malleable plan of action.
All we have on him speaks of a man who thought very quickly on his feet, and who provided solutions as best as he could as he went along. Some solutions were decidedly risky, but he was forced to make such decisions anyway. So he improvised, just like you say.
Thanks for you kind words, Barnaby - much, much appreciated, I can assure you.
All the best,
Fisherman
Comment