Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So......who do you think it was?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    G'Day Rainbow

    and welcome on-board.

    But have you considered that an accomplice really makes the fact that it was never solved stranger, especially with a pardon offered for an accomplice who squealed.
    G U T

    There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

    Comment


    • #47
      Thank you GUT

      also don't forget the timing of kelly's murder

      a pardon offer will not change their minds that easy when we are talking about political crimes , he will be afraid of them too
      Last edited by Rainbow; 01-25-2014, 01:00 AM.

      Comment


      • #48
        Sorry Rainbow

        Not sure I follow,

        Political Crimes?

        he will be afraid of them too
        Who are you suggesting will be afraid of whom?

        I must be a bit thick today.
        G U T

        There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

        Comment


        • #49
          GUT ,

          the accomplice will have the same motive , aim , doctrine , of his group , he will not change his belief for a pardon offer , besides , he will be afraid of his company if he betray them ..

          I can't be sure whom they were , but I do believe they were more than one person who committed those crimes

          The Jack the Ripper murders are not traditional sexual crimes , one can smell the conspiracy atmosphere all over it .. a conspiracy of some kind for sure
          Last edited by Rainbow; 01-25-2014, 03:29 AM.

          Comment


          • #50
            G'Day Rainbow

            So do I take it you see more than 2 in the conspiracy?
            G U T

            There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

            Comment


            • #51
              at least two , but if you want my opinion , they have to be more than two persons , and they may have women between them too

              Comment


              • #52
                G'Day Rainbow

                And is there any evidence or material, you can point me to, to support your theory?
                G U T

                There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                Comment


                • #53
                  yes , the phrase ( jewes are the MEN .. )

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Sorry but how does that point to a conspiracy, and who wrote it do you think?
                    G U T

                    There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      It is only my feeling .. after I read all of this .. no solid proof ..

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        So is it your theory that this was a group of Jews?

                        I must be extra thick tonight I just don't follow what your trying to suggest.
                        G U T

                        There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          also Emma Smith was attaked by three or four men ..

                          Emma , Tabram , Stride , Kelly , in all of these cases there were more than one person in the scene

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Oh, rainbows. I like those things.

                            What do you think about the possibility that, as an example, Nichols and Chapman were how you say authentic, and maybe Stride, Eddowes, and Kelly were opportunistic?
                            Valour pleases Crom.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              G'Day Rainbow

                              Emma I'll concede.

                              Martha wounds from two weapons does not prove two people, if and I repeat if you accept the double event at one hand, it is possible Jack carried more than one knife with him.

                              How so more than one with Liz and Mary Jane?
                              G U T

                              There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                stride :

                                Israel Schwartz said that the man who threw the woman down called out, apparently to the man on the opposite side of the road, "Lipski", and then Schwartz walked away

                                there were two men

                                kelly :

                                Sarah Lewis’ testimony , The man in the black wideawake hat, whom Sarah saw about 2.30 looking up Miller’s Court ‘as if waiting for someone to come out

                                and there was Hutchinson who watch the scene for 45 minuets ..
                                Last edited by Rainbow; 01-25-2014, 04:11 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X