Please allow me to state that I do not hold with this theory, but I put it out there because apparently others do. I was watching a documentary on Harry H. Holmes (real name Herman Mudgett) which postulated that he was Jack the Ripper in addition to Killing several people in Chicago during the World's Fair and then murdering one of his accompluices children and said accomplice (Pitzle or Pitzer). Apparently Mudgett's great-granson believes that he is Jack the Ripper offering the usual "evidence" we've seen here; "He could have went to London in1888" etc.
I dispute the assertion because Holmes basically killed for money without exception. Even in doing away with his accomplice and the children insurance was involved. However, I offer Harry up for the purposes of discussion and enlightenment. Enjoy!
I dispute the assertion because Holmes basically killed for money without exception. Even in doing away with his accomplice and the children insurance was involved. However, I offer Harry up for the purposes of discussion and enlightenment. Enjoy!
Comment