Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes
View Post
Hi Herlock - The Lechmere theorists make much ado (about nothing?) over the fact that Charlie wore a work apron to a mid-day inquest. But these East End inquests were hardly cuffs & collar events; much of the time they were held down at the pub. Does a person wear a monkey suit to an inquest held at the Bucket of Blood or the King's New Breeches? Why do I get the feeling that had Lechmere dressed in his Sunday suit they would argue the other side of the coin---that the suit was an attempt to put on a false front of dignity or to subtly signal to the inquest that he was a church goer? If people want to be suspicious, they will be suspicious and glean meaning from any incidental detail.
Now imagine if Lechmere's mother was called to the inquest and behaved like John Richardson's mother. First off--and evidently unlike anyone else--Mrs. Richardson put on a great show of kissing the bible on being sworn in:
Mrs. Richardson then tosses in an entirely irrelevant and gratuitous reference to having held a prayer meeting on Friday night!
God Gawd. Let's view this with the jaundiced eye of suspicion, shall we? What a phony act! All as if to say, "see how pious we Richardsons are?"
And, of course, Mrs. Richardson took the stand just before her son John was due to explain why he was in the backyard early in the morning with a knife and a dead unfortunate.
Using the standard methodology, we can draw one of two conclusions:
1) Mrs. Richardson was a phony who was putting on a front of religiosity to diminish any suspicions against her son.
2) Mrs Richardson was a religious fanatic who taught he son to detest the 'whores' of Whitechapel and Spitalfields. Indeed, while this might be entirely wrong, it seems more plausible than the similar accusations leveled at Maria Lechmere, who was not known to have spent her Friday nights giving prayer meetings.
By the way, the ELO made a point of saying that Mrs. Richardson was dressed far more decently and respectably than others in her situation. Not too far from the 'very decent' description by Booth--apparently of the Lechmere family. Yet John Richardson's clothes were specifically noted as being worn. Another example of the 'umble act, or simply reflective of life in the East End where people worked on the same day that they attended an inquest?
Comment