Originally posted by rjpalmer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Augustus Robertson Raff?? = August Raffel
Collapse
X
-
As David Barrat mentions, Rieffel’s son William was convicted of forging his father’s cheques, and a result he was sent to a reformatory. That was in 1913, when William was just 15 years old.
In 1935, William formally renounced the name Rieffel and adopted the surname Ruffle.
However, when August(us) died in 1941 William Ruffle was appointed his executor.
Leave a comment:
-
Living alone at 100, Priory Road, Gosport in 1939?
Augustus L. Reiffell, a retired butcher, DOB 7th Feb., 1856.
Leave a comment:
-
FYI, David Barrat has posted some further info on this guy: https://www.orsam.co.uk/butcherofwhitechapel.htm
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by erobitha View Post
I stand corrected, like the man in orthopaedic shoes.
it still smacks to me of someone trying to accuse someone else.
Regardless, though, I think this is a nice piece of sleuthing and has a high probability of identifying the person named in the letter, if not necessarily the letter writer themselves. The letter writer, though, is no doubt in his circle of acquaintances, and if not Julia, then probably someone from where he worked at the time would be the next likely connection. Great stuff.
- Jeff
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Kattrup View Post
I thought the OP had the 1881 census as Raffel?
In addition, there's no doubt, I think, that he was called Raffel and not Riffel, since the name is meant to rhyme with chapel.
it still smacks to me of someone trying to accuse someone else.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by erobitha View PostHe declares himself (or someone is) as Raffel spelling yet no record has matched that spelling. I know census takers make mistakes but there would be at least one record that matched his own spelling surely?
It sounds to be as if it is being spelt phonetically in the original letter as that is how the writer hears it. The more likely spelling surely would be closer to the census entries?
In addition, there's no doubt, I think, that he was called Raffel and not Riffel, since the name is meant to rhyme with chapel.
Leave a comment:
-
He declares himself (or someone is) as Raffel spelling yet no record has matched that spelling. I know census takers make mistakes but there would be at least one record that matched his own spelling surely?
It sounds to be as if it is being spelt phonetically in the original letter as that is how the writer hears it. The more likely spelling surely would be closer to the census entries?
Leave a comment:
-
There's an Augustus Rieffel, born Germany, the king of sausage skins, living in Alverstoke, Gosport, in 1901. The age is a wee bit off, but he could have fudged the date for his young wife. He died in the 1940s, when his name is listed as August Lenard Rieffel, so that could be a problem. May or may not be the same bloke, but perhaps the butcher retired to the coast.
That's all I have.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Astatine
The watchmaker, John Philip Kraft, that Riffel/Raffel is living with in 1891, is also from Mainz, Germany, so there could be a relationship of some sort; Kraft lived in the East End since at least 1881, and lived in Bow/West Ham the remainder of his life. His wife was British (Yarmouth), so he's not likely to have been a brother-in-law.
The fact that Riffel is listed as a 'visitor' rather than a lodger is suggestive. Where's Julia?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
I wonder if any local library in Blackheath will carry archived copies of local newspapers from 1888 mentioning these rumors of Jack the Ripper?
That's how I tracked down Joseph Isaacs, through local rags, they carry stories the national press have no room for.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by JeffHamm View Post
Thanks Joshua. I think I've understood you, and have marked it with the red X. Just thought it would be interesting to see where the letter was referring to.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by erobitha View PostNice detective work.
It would appear whoever wrote the letter may have had this Augustus Riffel in mind. It could as easily be a set up as much as it is a confession. Or simply the ramblings of a mad man.
He realised after he wrote the letter that Charles Warren was in the police and not the Home Office. Something prompted him to correct it. My guess is reading a newspaper article or some kind of interview with Warren. His mind was focused on Warren specifically.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: