Would a Doctor or a Policeman participate in major crimes such as these?

[Elamarna]

Are you going to Answer post #651?

In case you missed it here it is again.

I recall following the Missing Evidence documentary, you contacted Scoble to clarify what he had actually said.
I notice you do not name the expert you use so others can do the same as you did.

If the expert is unwilling to allow their name to be used, then one must say that one must question two things:

A.The validity of what it is claimed the expert said.

B. If the expert actually exists.

[Elamarna]

I am not an expert on women's health so I sought the opinion of an expert and his opinion should not be dismissed outright

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

By editing the quote you reply to, it's hidden that I am not actually talking about women's health at that point, but YOUR opinion that the victim would not walk around with soiled sanitary towels.
To respond by quoting the expert, when the original comment was not related to his expertise is simply DISINGENUOUS, and you know that.

[FISHY1118]

This jig was up long ago when it was put to Trevor about Mary Kelly and why the murderer did in fact removerd her organ at the murder scene .Which he could not answer.

1 Anyone who thinks Mary Jane Kelly wasnt a Ripper victim, and her killler wasnt the same hand that killed Eddowes shouldnt be posting on this site ,thats just a given.

2 The fact that Dr Bond decribes in detail the removal of Kellys organs from the Viscera in this way ''The whole of the surface of the abdomen & thighs was removed & the abdominal Cavity ''Emptied' of its viscera. Nowhere has it be Proven or Mentioned anywhere that the organs were ripped out and mutilated during this process .

''The viscera were found in various parts viz: the uterus & Kidneys, the Liver between the feet, the intestines by the right side & the s pleen by the left side of the body. Again no mention that the organs themselves were damaged or mutilated. So given the amount of time he had with kelly to admire his handy work , its certainly not outside the realms of possibility that the killer remover the organs skillfully first then followed by the awful mutilation of her entire body . Why ???? who the ''F'' knows why, i dont give a rats ass either, but lets be done with this Ludicrous phantom organ harvesting theory ffs.




Conclusion, both Eddowes and Kelly had their organs removed by Jack the Ripper on the night they were killed at the murder scene!!!! .

Forget all about sanitary napkins , thats all smoke and mirrors and gibberish nonsense, just like the Maybrick Diary . Imo.

[Ally]

It is an unknown.

So why are you using your gynaecologist’s information as if he was stating a definite fact?

It’s not a difficult question.

Seriously? This is the question you decide to press for an answer for? SERIOUSLY? Learn to let go dude.

[Herlock Sholmes]

He was giving an opinion based on his years of experience in female gynaecological issues

he stated blood spotting is consistent with menstruation in some reports the rag was described as being spotted with blood

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

I’m not questioning his knowledge. According to you he said ‘might have.’ That’s not anything like a certainty. So why do you use it as one?

Also, why is it that you talk of ‘some reports’ when you keep telling us that we shouldn’t seek to rely on newspaper reports. Another example of you applying one set of criteria’s for yourself but demanding another for others.

You also asked why there was only blood on one side but no one claimed this. Why?

You also claimed that the abdomen would have been filled with blood contrary to what Dr. Brown said. Why?

[Trevor Marriott]

And your expert passed an opinion that a woman like Eddowes might not have had a full-blown period. I know nothing about the subject so unless someone provides evidence to the contrary I’ll accept what he said. But that’s of no use to us because he said that she might not have had one; which means that it’s just as likely that she might have.

It is an unknown.

So why are you using your gynaecologist’s information as if he was stating a definite fact?

It’s not a difficult question.

He was giving an opinion based on his years of experience in female gynaecological issues

he stated blood spotting is consistent with menstruation in some reports the rag was described as being spotted with blood

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

[Herlock Sholmes]

I am not an expert on women's health so I sought the opinion of an expert and his opinion should not be dismissed outright

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

And your expert passed an opinion that a woman like Eddowes might not have had a full-blown period. I know nothing about the subject so unless someone provides evidence to the contrary I’ll accept what he said. But that’s of no use to us because he said that she might not have had one; which means that it’s just as likely that she might have.

It is an unknown.

So why are you using your gynaecologist’s information as if he was stating a definite fact?

It’s not a difficult question.

[Trevor Marriott]

Merely your opinion, your sensibilities , but expressed as if you are an expert on women's health, when you clearly know very little.

I am not an expert on women's health so I sought the opinion of an expert and his opinion should not be dismissed outright

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

[Dickere]

Trevor,
A question.
Is it true that, rather than being a “Retired Murder Squad Detective” -as you’ve promoted yourself for years- you actually resigned from the Bedfordshire Police Department after being caught abusing your sick days in order to provide adult entertainment at hen parties?

JM

We don't have police departments here, we have police and constabularies. In this case, it's Bedfordshire Police.

[Dickere]

Again you twist words around to suit your own purpose

The consultant was giving his valuable opinion based on his years in doing the same job in which he would have spoken to and examined many women from all different walks of life so I respect his opinion over the adverse comment made regarding his opinion

and as to your aardvark theory that shows your ignorance as they are not found in this country

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

London Zoo had an aardvark from 1869, it may have been the culprit here.

[Enigma]

I'm not saying this applies here. This saga makes me think of my late uncle who was prepared to to take a contrary position on any subject, notwithstanding his private opinion, and make the most outrageous statements simply because he loved an argument.

[jmenges]

Trevor,
A question.
Is it true that, rather than being a “Retired Murder Squad Detective” -as you’ve promoted yourself for years- you actually resigned from the Bedfordshire Police Department after being caught abusing your sick days in order to provide adult entertainment at hen parties?

JM

[Herlock Sholmes]

Again you twist words around to suit your own purpose

The consultant was giving his valuable opinion based on his years in doing the same job in which he would have spoken to and examined many women from all different walks of life so I respect his opinion over the adverse comment made regarding his opinion

and as to your aardvark theory that shows your ignorance as they are not found in this country

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

I was going on your own words.

“Well, that's not what a consultant gynaecologist has stated a woman of Eddowes age and lifestyle would still be menstruating but she may not have a full-blown period due to her being malnourished and her lifestyle.”

You can’t make a defence of your theory using a ‘may not have had a full-blown period’ because she might well have.

Keep up.

[Elamarna]

The consultant was giving his valuable opinion based on his years in doing the same job in which he would have spoken to and examined many women from all different walks of life so I respect his opinion over the adverse comment made regarding his opinion

I recall following the Missing Evidence documentary, you contacted Scoble to clarify what he had actually said.
I notice you do not name the expert you use so others can do the same as you did.

If the expert is unwilling to allow their name to be used, then one must say that one must question two things:

A.The validity of what it is claimed the expert said.

B. If the expert actually exists.

[Elamarna]

It doesn't matter how many she used a day, is she then going to carry around with her for days smelly soiled sanitary rags before washing them, I don't think so

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

Merely your opinion, your sensibilities , but expressed as if you are an expert on women's health, when you clearly know very little.