If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The arrest of tall, dark suspects only means that the individuals in question came to the attention of the police for reasons that were unrelated to their physical appearance. If a tall, dark man is arrested for assaulting a woman (for example), he's hardly going to be released immediately owing to incompatibility with ripper-associated eyewitness descriptions. He would warrant serious investigation in spite of this incompatibility. This does not invalidate the observation that Tumblety is a very poor match for the witness descriptions.
I'm also not convinced that Tumblety conforms as closely as you suggest to a psychopathic personality. Do we really have any great insight into Tumblety's ability or otherwise "to love"?
Just I aside here, but I wonder how many of the 20 people who voted for "other/unknown" had the same specific "other" in mind?
All the best,
Ben
Hi Ben,
Excellent points, but of course I disagree with you. That fact that they followed through with arresting tall men, demonstrates that them focusing primarily upon specific suspect witness descriptions got them nowhere. Again, there are no suspect descriptions of anyone doing the actual killing. In the case of Tumblety, certain articles do demonstrate he was suspected. Notice the first one even has Inspector Byrnes basically admitting Scotland Yard suspected Tumblety:
New York World (U.S.A.), 4 December 1888
Inspector Byrnes was asked what his object in shadowing Twomblety. "I simply wanted to put a tag on him." he replied, "so that we can tell where he is. Of course, he cannot be arrested, for there is no proof in his complicity in the Whitechapel murders, and the crime for which he was under bond in London is not extaditable."
The Evening World, December 3, 1888
…The London police are anxiously searching for samples of his handwriting to compare with that of “Jack the Ripper.”
We actually do have insight in Tumblety’s ability to love. One is in all of his life, we see none. Even in the gay community, we find partners. Another is his passion for Caine in the 1870s. A closer look at this relationship is quite revealing.
There is something about JK Stephen thats always bothered me but dont ask me why.
However I have a question for all of you if you can be bothered that is. If you had a sealed envelope in front of you that contained the name of JtR, could you or would you honestly bet a huge amount of money on who it definitely WAS'NT. I know I wouldnt...not even Maybrick.
I dont wish to get into the Maybrick arguments on this thread, however I would point out that there is no evidence that the diary is a modern fake as far as I know., but more likely a hoax from the actual period.
Hi Scott,
I was dreading that question, to be honest it's such a long time ago I read up on him that I really cant remember. I will dust down my old books and refresh my memory and hopefully Those old feelings will return.
I am going with James Kelly. He looks alot more like JtR in the few sketches i have seen rather then Kosminsky does(in my opinion), he knew how to use a knife(upholsterer), later in life, he admitted to being in london during that time and I think he could have acted "normal" when conversing with his victims so that they would let their guards down just that bit for him to pounce. Although both were insane, I don't think Kosminsky could have mantained a sane appearance long enough to lure these women to their death. I know I am going to get asked to prove this....but I can only base it on various documentaries I have seen. I await the responses from those more experienced in this subject then me.
I dont wish to get into the Maybrick arguments on this thread, however I would point out that there is no evidence that the diary is a modern fake as far as I know., but more likely a hoax from the actual period.
Hi Spy. Actually, the opposite is true. Our own Simon Wood is the one who noticed the 'FM' on Mary Kelly's wall in the early 80's, and this is referenced in the Diary. More to the point, a poem in Donald McCormick's book, which he attributed to the Ripper, appears in an altered form in the Diary, and McCormick has since acknowledged that he made that poem up. The full story of that is in the new book by Spiro. There's little doubt but that the Diary was written within a few years of it becoming public.
If you had a sealed envelope in front of you that contained the name of JtR, could you or would you honestly bet a huge amount of money on who it definitely WAS'NT. I know I wouldnt...not even Maybrick.
Absolutely, and I would be right, because I always am.
The arrest of tall, dark suspects only means that the individuals in question came to the attention of the police for reasons that were unrelated to their physical appearance. If a tall, dark man is arrested for assaulting a woman (for example), he's hardly going to be released immediately owing to incompatibility with ripper-associated eyewitness descriptions. He would warrant serious investigation in spite of this incompatibility. This does not invalidate the observation that Tumblety is a very poor match for the witness descriptions.
I'm not so sure about that. Pipeman was about 6ft tall, and Lawende's man was 5'9" while slouching. I'm 6'2" and usually have my height guessed at 5'10" to 6ft.
Hi Spyglass,
I would most certainly take the challenge to guess who was not written in the envelope. Since I would assume some undeniable evidence would accompany the name, I would say the first person that came to mind from this case, hand over all I had, and run with the proof and name. All I have, for that? I would be homeless with a smile for a short time.
I confess that altruistic and cynically selfish talk seem to me about equally unreal. With all humility, I think 'whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might,' infinitely more important than the vain attempt to love one's neighbour as one's self. If you want to hit a bird on the wing you must have all your will in focus, you must not be thinking about yourself, and equally, you must not be thinking about your neighbour; you must be living with your eye on that bird. Every achievement is a bird on the wing.
Oliver Wendell Holmes
Comment