Originally posted by Ben
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Did The Ripper Die Shortly After His Last Kill?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ChristineI don't think we can rule out suicide: as problematic as the Druitt story is, the basic idea that the family figured it out and it ended in a suicide (or even "assisted" suicide) seems pretty plausible to me.
The thing about Jack killing himself is that there's enough proof to suggest that he actually valued his life. He did not want to be caught. Look at all the people suspected of being the Ripper because of his secrecy, all the myths, he's even a Hollywood icon because of the mystery surrounding his identity. If he didn't value his life then he would've been caught either of his own volition or due to carelessness.
If one thing, this proves that he didn't have a narcissitic personality.
Comment
-
Hello,all.
JTR was a murderous freak who quite liked what he was doing. I don't believe for one moment he would have been able to control his hellish urges for any long amount of time. I used to entertain the idea that he might have,for lack of a better term,gorged himself with MJK. But he liked to kill. So I think he would've gotten up to more murder.
My fav theory is that he met the wrong working girl and she gave him what for with a sharp blade of her own!
Maybe the police knew exactly who he was but the evidence wasn't strong enough for an arrest. So they dropped a wee hint to the vigilantes,so they could do what the police legally couldn't.JTR also could have tried again,the woman raised the alarm,and he went down as just another victim of a WC street attack. If these scenarios didn't happen,he had to be imprisoned or died soon after. I'm no profiler,but I think a nut who operated at this level of violence and viciousness,doesn't appear to have any self control,like a BTK type.JTR committing suicide doesn't work for me,either. These cowardly types are quite fond of their miserable lives.I am quite mad and there's nothing to be done for it.
When your first voice speaks,listen to it. It may save your life one day.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nicola View PostMy fav theory is that he met the wrong working girl and she gave him what for with a sharp blade of her own!
I was watching Whitechapel last night and there was a scene where someone visited MJK's grave and I thought: somewhere out there is a man's grave and no-one is none the wiser that he was Jack the Ripper. It's a weird thought to think that his remains are out there somewhere and no-one knows of their 'value'. He could be buried under literally anywhere.
Comment
-
Given the scale of Kelly's murder I would say the Ripper would probably be able to hold off not killing for a longer period of time, masturbating over the Miller's Court scene for quite probably months as he had finally achieved his objective. This is probably why he also didn't take his favoured organs, uterus or kidney, as the prolonged memory of the night would be more tangible than a trophy in this case.
So I would be looking at deaths up to around March/April 1889."Damn it, Doc! Why did you have to tear up that letter? If only I had more time... Wait a minute, I got all the time I want! I got a time machine!"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mascara & Paranoia View PostThe 'assisted' suicide speculation seems more likely than Jack actually topping himself, and even that's far-fetched (no offence ;p).
The thing about Jack killing himself is that there's enough proof to suggest that he actually valued his life. He did not want to be caught. Look at all the people suspected of being the Ripper because of his secrecy, all the myths, he's even a Hollywood icon because of the mystery surrounding his identity. If he didn't value his life then he would've been caught either of his own volition or due to carelessness.
If one thing, this proves that he didn't have a narcissitic personality.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BLUE WIZZARD View PostJack was not the type of man to quit, he enjoyed it to much.
BW
Comment
-
Originally posted by Christine View PostHow do you know this? How do you know, for example, that he wasn't "forced by demons" to kill? If I had to take bets, I'd bet that he got some sort of sexual gratification out of it and did enjoy it, but I don't rule out other possibilities.
Christine,
You have no argument from me, I just do not think that he would have quit.
BW"A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.”
Albert Einstein
Comment
-
Mort Belfry & Nothing to see,
Again you have no argument from me, I just do not think that he would have quit.
I can not make it any more clear, I just do not think that he would have quit.
What part of this do you not understand?
BW"A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.”
Albert Einstein
Comment
-
Originally posted by BLUE WIZZARD View PostMort Belfry & Nothing to see,
Again you have no argument from me, I just do not think that he would have quit.
I can not make it any more clear, I just do not think that he would have quit.
What part of this do you not understand?
BW
What part of that did you not understand? Because I can offer help with interpretation if needed.
Of course I can withdraw the question if it totally unmuzzles your deep-seated anger and sets you stomping about on a warpath of wanton destruction."Damn it, Doc! Why did you have to tear up that letter? If only I had more time... Wait a minute, I got all the time I want! I got a time machine!"
Comment
-
That's a brilliant idea, I think I might run a search just to have a look myself. But I always thought that maybe there's a possibility that he reached what several killers call their "satisfaction point". When they've finally killed enough and feel they don't need to anymore. Maybe he reached his own level.For every man who says "It was him!" there will always be a man who says "You're wrong."
Comment
Comment