Originally posted by Chava
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mr Blotchy
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
Also-IMHO its a weak argument that Blotchy wouldn't have killed Mary because he was seen. a lot of witnesses saw suspects/ripper. as long as he realized they didn't know him then it was a go-hes just some anonymous nobody.
There is always the risk that somebody will recognize the description, or even that the people who see him have a hunch who he is.
I would suggest that beeing seen by somebody is the perhaps most powerful factor in keeping the killer from killing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by c.d. View PostHello Abby,
Assuming for the sake of argument that Hutch was telling the truth he literally peered in the face of the Astrakhan man as opposed to fleeting and distant sightings of the other witnesses. I'm eliminating B.S. man as seen by Schwartz because I don't think he was Stride's killer.
I agree with your no detective worth his salt assessment and I don't think the detectives (including Abberline) who questioned Hutch were fools. Since they appeared to give him a pass they either didn't think he was lying or else they concluded that yes, he might have lied for some reason but that regardless he was not involved in Kelly's murder.
c.d.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chava View PostFisherman that’s a really good point! But I don’t think it lets Blotchy off the hook even though he knew he had been seen. Kelly’s singing helps him in my opinion. If she hadn’t started her serenade he might have had second thoughts. Everything goes quiet after he goes in with her. Incriminating! But she sang for an hour. So couldn’t be him, right? Everyone is thinking—including members of this board—that he kind of lies in wait and pounces. But when you think about it there is no evidence for that. He could have spent time with all the other victims before he killed them. There’s missing time on all of them.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostNot so much Eddowes; he had to act pretty fast there, it seems. In the case of Nichols, too, he only appears to have had a maximum of just over one hour since Polly was last seen. Not that I'm dismissing the idea that the killer wouldn't have spent time with Kelly before killing her, but Kelly was a special case in that she had her own premises. Out on the streets, however, I doubt that there would really have been enough time for him to acquaint himself with his victims.
As for the cashous, I was describing the normal usage, not the actual designation.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chava View PostIf Kelly started to sing I think he would wait until she had finished. He doesn’t know who else is out there who might hear if she stopped mid-warble.
That's a good point Chava-id never thought of that. to me he waited probably to let things calm down a bit around millers court.
Also-IMHO its a weak argument that Blotchy wouldn't have killed Mary because he was seen. a lot of witnesses saw suspects/ripper. as long as he realized they didn't know him then it was a go-hes just some anonymous nobody.
Leave a comment:
-
If Kelly started to sing I think he would wait until she had finished. He doesn’t know who else is out there who might hear if she stopped mid-warble.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chava View PostHe could have spent time with all the other victims before he killed them. There’s missing time on all of them.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chava View PostFisherman that’s a really good point! But I don’t think it lets Blotchy off the hook even though he knew he had been seen. Kelly’s singing helps him in my opinion. If she hadn’t started her serenade he might have had second thoughts. Everything goes quiet after he goes in with her. Incriminating! But she sang for an hour. So couldn’t be him, right? Everyone is thinking—including members of this board—that he kind of lies in wait and pounces. But when you think about it there is no evidence for that. He could have spent time with all the other victims before he killed them. There’s missing time on all of them.
As for Blotchy being the possible killer, I am not opposed to the idea. But I remain unconvinced that our man would kill if he knew he had been seen very clearly. Reasonably, Blotchy could not be sure that people would hear Mary sing or that they would testify about it - and making a later kill would in your scenario more or less bank on it.
Of corse, WE know that Cox - and others - heard her, but how would Blotchy be able to bank on people even being at home? Cox certainly came and left, and so could others have.
Leave a comment:
-
Fisherman that’s a really good point! But I don’t think it lets Blotchy off the hook even though he knew he had been seen. Kelly’s singing helps him in my opinion. If she hadn’t started her serenade he might have had second thoughts. Everything goes quiet after he goes in with her. Incriminating! But she sang for an hour. So couldn’t be him, right? Everyone is thinking—including members of this board—that he kind of lies in wait and pounces. But when you think about it there is no evidence for that. He could have spent time with all the other victims before he killed them. There’s missing time on all of them.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chava View PostIt's the singing that's throwing me off regarding Blotchy. Up until now, Jack is the blitzkrieg killer, doesn't care who is within earshot of his murders, and doesn't seem to have any real sexual interest in his victims. Mary should have been murdered five minutes after closing her door; and if Blotchy's Jack, he should have been long gone by 1am. Instead I'm left to consider the possibility that he went back to her cold apartment, drank his beer by candlelight, and listened to her sing for the better part of an hour.
But the thing is we don’t know that he’s a ‘Blitzkrieg killer’. At the point he kills, yes. But we don’t know how much time he spends with his victims before that, and that time could vary. If Kelly was his chosen victim he would wait until she was vulnerable. And by the way I put no faith whatsoever in Hutch.
Years ago I started a thread that ran and ran about the piece of apron in Eddowes. I said we’d ignored it far too long and it was the only physical evidence in the case that was found away from the victim. Now I’m going to point out that Mr Blotchy is the only person in the case who matches descriptions given in multiple events. We look for reasons to exonerate him because we know Kelly was still alive for a while after going in with him. We ignore the fact that he knew he had been seen by Cox and therefore let his victim sing her head off to prove she was alive with him.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Michael W Richards View PostAnother possibility is that Blotchy escorted her home to be sure she arrived safely,..she rewarded him with a short serenade.
And on Stride...there is no evidence that Stride went off down into dark corners with any person she was seen with that night, she was dressed nicely, had requested the use of a lint brush for her skirt, and she had breath fresheners and a flower arrangement on her.
It is a common enough mistake to call them breath fresheners, but it would be nice if we were a bit careful with the distinctions.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Craig H View PostHi Robert
The other option is that the victims knew Jack. This explains why he was listening to Mary sing for an hour. Previous posts have shown how all the victims lived close to each other.
I also think the William Marshall saw Jack with Stride even though it was an hour before she died. The Marshall description is similar to PC Smith (Stride) and Lawende (Eddowes). Others have suggested Stride wasn't soliciting that night.
I also think Jack gave the victims a gift (the bonnet, rings, cigarette case) as a way to charm them.
Craig
And on Stride...there is no evidence that Stride went off down into dark corners with any person she was seen with that night, she was dressed nicely, had requested the use of a lint brush for her skirt, and she had breath fresheners and a flower arrangement on her.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostWell, thats what Dr Bond believed before the inquest, but after 1:00 am, according to Prater there was no light in her room, and all was quiet, then the room was more than likely empty.
Which Bond would not have been aware of.
No-one saw Blotchy leave the room....and no-one saw Mary leave the room...the only difference being that we know Blotchy left at some point.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: