Originally posted by Fisherman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Madness of Joseph Fleming
Collapse
X
-
Hello folks,
I have been a Barnett man for donkeys years, however my attitude is somewhat changing, and I agree with Michael that a certain Joseph Flemming/fleming [incase Bob is watching] has far better credentials.
We have that old motive Jealously for one, also the mention of him ill-using her, for her association with the other man that shared his christian name.
We have his residence during that autumn at a certain 'Victoria home', which was situated right in the area of all the murders.
But most important of all we have the insanity, and a description of his mania.
A jealous insane man, and the Ripper murders ending with the death of Mjk, this individual has to be one major candidate, and should be investigated with every resource one can.
Regards Richard.
Merry xmas all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostHow so, Fish? For one thing, I'm not so sure that it's recorded that Joe Fleming gave Kelly money; for another, even if he did, he had lodgings of his own.
Lodgings of his own implies he was seeking shelter, I think we both know better than that if it was he who showed up at 3:45am "ish" in Millers Court...his bed at the Victoria Home, which according to Ben he wasnt even registered at, ..wouldnt be as inviting as the one in Millers Court, cause it also had a 26 year old partially dressed woman in that one.
Best regards Sam.
Comment
-
Originally posted by perrymason View PostI cant recall which of Marys friends mentions [Fleming giving Mary money]...Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post...neither can I, Mike We have Barnett testifying that he gave Mary what money he had, and Hutchinson claiming to having given her some shillings on occasion. Apart from that, all I can recall Fleming's (or "another man named Joe", to be more faithful to Julia Venturney's testimony) being said to have given Mary is some "ill-use" now and then.
I do feel Ill find a quote, Im fairly sure...but what actual value it may have, is out of my hands.
All the best Sam.
Comment
-
Hi Ben,
It was in her inquest testimony. This should be cued up right, but if not, it's on page 416. That's right, Evans & Skinner is online.
Stewart P. Evans, a retired police officer and curator of the Suffolk Police Museum in England, has researched the Whitechapel Murders for more than thirty years. He is the coauthor of Jack the Ripper: First American Serial Killer. Keith Skinner, for three decades a historical researcher of the Ripper case, is coauthor of such titles as The Ripper Legacy and The Jack the Ripper A to Z.
Hope this helps,
RoySink the Bismark
Comment
-
Thanks, Roy
However - picking up on Ben's point about her police statement - Venturney attributes the money-giving to Joe Barnett: "I knew the man who I saw down stairs (Joe Barnett) he is called Joe, he lived with her until quite recently. I have heard him say that he did not like her going out on the streets, he frequently gave her money, he was very kind to her, he said he would not live with her while she led that course of life."
Whilst the official inquest files indeed record her as saying that "the other Joe" was prone to give her money, they also show that she believed this "other Joe" was a costermonger.
There appears to be some real confusion in Julia Venturney's testimony on this specific point. I may be wrong in this, but whereas many press reports state that Venturney testified that Joe Barnett was kind to Mary, none of them appear to record her saying that "the other Joe" gave her money. Is this another instance where the official record is to be found wanting, and the journalists' accounts closer to the truth?Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Well Sam, I don't rightly know the answer. Her Police statement and inquest testimony together. (I have bolded her part about the "other Joe.")
From Evans & Skinner - Statement of Julia Venturney 9 Nov 1888
I occupy No 1 room Millers Court I am a widow, charwoman but now living with a man named Harry Owen. I was awake all night and could not sleep. I have known the person occupying No 13 room opposite mine for about 4 months. I knew the man who I saw down stairs (Joe Barnett) he is called Joe, he lived with her until quite recently. I have heard him say that he did not like her ["because" - deleted] going out on the streets, he frequently gave her money, he was very kind to her, he said he would not live with her while she led that course of life, she used to get tipsey occasionally. She broke the windows a few weeks ago whilst she was drunk, she told me she was very fond of another man named Joe, and he had often ill-used her because she cohabited with Joe (Barnett). I saw her last about ["1.40" - deleted] pm yesterday. Thursday about 10 A.M
Inquest:
Julia Venturney having been sworn deposed as follows: I live at No 1 room Millers Court I am a charwoman I live with Harry Owen I knew the female who occupied No. 13 room she said she was a married woman and her name was Kelly. She lived with Joe Barnett she frequently got drunk Joe Barnett would not let her go on the streets – Deceased said she was fond of another man named Joe who used to come and see her and give her money I think he was a costermonger she said she was very fond of him – I last saw her alive on Thursday about 10 a m having her breakfast with another woman in her room. I went to bed on Thursday night about 8 oclock I could not sleep all night I only dozed I heard no one in the court I heard no singing I heard no scream – deceased often sung Irish songs.
Was not the Kelly inquest the only one where we have the official record? Is that what you mean Sam, that the newpaper coverage of this portion of testimony is different?Sink the Bismark
Comment
-
All things considered, eveything Julia said pales to the hearsay she repeated from the lips of the deceased - she told me she was very fond of another man named Joe, and he had often ill-used her because she cohabited with Joe (Barnett) which was contained in the police statement. The question of if this "Joe" was giving her money really doesn't matter opposed to the above statement. (IMHO)
Otherwise, we're playin Buckaroo!Sink the Bismark
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roy Corduroy View PostWas not the Kelly inquest the only one where we have the official record?Is that what you mean Sam, that the newpaper coverage of this portion of testimony is different?
Your observation about "Buckaroo" is spot-on, by the way - and you used the term correctly! 'Tis enough to note that "the other Joe" (whom we assume to be Fleming, and of whom Mary was very fond) would ill-use Kelly on account of her living with Barnett.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Hi Sam
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostYour observation about "Buckaroo" is spot-on, by the way - and you used the term correctly! 'Tis enough to note that "the other Joe" (whom we assume to be Fleming, and of whom Mary was very fond) would ill-use Kelly on account of her living with Barnett.
all the best
Observer
Comment
-
Hi Observer,
The chances of Fleming having been tracked down by the police are incredibly slim, considering that he moved into the murder district in August of 1888, and was known to resort to an alias. If he'd been using that alias since that August, which wasn't a very long time, there's no reason to suppose that anyone at the Victoria Home knew him as Fleming.
Best regards,
Ben
Comment
Comment