Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What makes Druitt a viable suspect?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
    unsubstantiated newspaper report , cant be verified unless you show the original article . could someone please post the article if it indeed exist .

    ĎThere you go Fishy.

    https://ibb.co/PxVpsrN
    Last edited by Herlock Sholmes; 06-16-2019, 05:32 PM.
    Regards

    Herlock






    "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

    Comment


    • In my experience, Herlock Sholmes is one of the more reasonable, balanced posters on here.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Harry D View Post
        In my experience, Herlock Sholmes is one of the more reasonable, balanced posters on here.
        Thank you Harry

        Although I have to admit to my part in sidetracking your thread.
        Regards

        Herlock






        "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

        Comment


        • Originally posted by packers stem View Post

          Utter nonsense

          Try asking yoursef how on earth anybody could deduce what he's written in the report , including the two points I made clear to you without reading the inquest notes , as he was asked to do

          If what you say is true he made so much up on a whim that it may as well have been written by Kosminsky
          Well it came straight from the horses mouth, Bond told you (the reader) that he only read the "notes".
          The fact you fail to understand the process is your impediment, not mine.
          Regards, Jon S.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by packers stem View Post
            What October has to with the wild estimation of the 3-4 hours ( which you have already tried to justify by saying that he only read the post mortem notes ) is anybody's guess as this occurs in the report dated Nov 10th .
            He either read the inquest testimony before Nov 10th or he didn't.
            Which do you want to hang your hat on?
            A hanging sounds like a good idea at the moment!
            Regards, Jon S.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Wickerman View Post

              A hanging sounds like a good idea at the moment!
              Regards

              Herlock






              "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Wickerman View Post

                Well it came straight from the horses mouth, Bond told you (the reader) that he only read the "notes".
                The fact you fail to understand the process is your impediment, not mine.
                Care to give your explanation on how Dr Bond deduced, solely from his use of post mortem notes the following


                "In all the cases there appears to be no evidence of struggling and the attacks were probably so sudden and made in such a position that the women could neither resist nor cry out "

                Or

                "in the first four cases the murderer must have attacked from the right side of the victim"

                I'm not sure why you want to keep digging this hole tbh
                You can lead a horse to water.....

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Wickerman View Post

                  A hanging sounds like a good idea at the moment!
                  Pleasant
                  You can lead a horse to water.....

                  Comment


                  • . Care to give your explanation on how Dr Bond deduced, solely from his use of post mortem notes the following


                    "In all the cases there appears to be no evidence of struggling and the attacks were probably so sudden and made in such a position that the women could neither resist nor cry out "
                    No defensive wounds on the hands or arms?

                    And no one heard anyone cry out?
                    Regards

                    Herlock






                    "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
                      9 years and nearly 8000 post and still searching , its a forum abby, everyone's allowed an opinion i could sit here all day and rip into how the likes of druitt , cutbush , kosminski cross, lechmere and all 200 other suspecst had nothing to do with jtr but i dont.
                      Because every single suspect that has ever been named was far more likely to have been Jack the Ripper than Sir William Gull as part of a Royal Conspiracy. Itís incredible that Iíve already explained to you how Simonís research showed that 1. Crook categorically wasnít a Catholic, 2. She categorically wasnít living at 6 Cleveland Street, 3. Annie Crook and Elizabeth Cook categorically werenít one and the same as Hans Christian Knight claimed, 4. Sickertís Cleveland Street studio, around which the conspiracy originated, categorically did not exist in 1888, and 5. The hospital that Knight said that Crook was taken to by the evil Gull categorically did not exist.

                      How can your confidence in this theory survive so many hammer blows?

                      Open your eyes Fishy. It never happened. It was made up.
                      Regards

                      Herlock






                      "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

                      Comment


                      • Fishy1118:

                        . unsubstantiated newspaper report , cant be verified unless you show the original article . could someone please post the article if it indeed exist .
                        well......

                        Article posted. Plus an article from The Brisbane Courier that has the same facts.

                        Yet another hammer blow to the theory?

                        Any response Fishy?
                        Regards

                        Herlock






                        "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

                        Comment


                        • Also,

                          Post #2681 Fishy?
                          Regards

                          Herlock






                          "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

                          Comment


                          • Hi Fishy,

                            In the Sunday Times, 18th June 1978, Joseph Sickert [Gorman] was quoted as saying, ďIt was a hoax; I made it all upĒ and, it was ďa whopping fib.Ē

                            Check it out for yourself.

                            Regards,

                            Simon
                            Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
                              Hi Herlock,

                              Are you absolutely certain the Macnaghten Memorandum wasn't part of the wild conspiracy that never was you keep batting on about?

                              Regards,

                              Simon
                              Hi Simon,

                              Something canít be a part of something that never existed.
                              Regards

                              Herlock






                              "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

                              Comment


                              • Hi Herlock,

                                It's only you who says unequivocally that certain something didn't exist.

                                I'm not saying it did, but I'm curious enough to try to find out for certain.
                                Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X