Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lack of Threads

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    Fair points Steve however it is worth noting that there are some weak suspects who anyone sensible would reguard as non starters for being Jack the Ripper.

    Cheers John
    Hi John

    Agree 100%.

    we can't control what some people want to post.

    Those who are serious know who the viable suspects are and who are not.

    regards

    steve

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    Fair points Steve however it is worth noting that there are some weak suspects who anyone sensible would reguard as non starters for being Jack the Ripper.

    Cheers John
    But a lot of posters here who aren't real sensible.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Fair points Steve however it is worth noting that there are some weak suspects who anyone sensible would reguard as non starters for being Jack the Ripper.

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    Many weak suspects get plenty of threads on this site how come Bury who I would consider to be the strongest suspect has relatively few threads?
    Dear John

    The answer to your question is contained within it:

    "who I would consider to be the strongest suspect "

    Obviously most people do not share your conviction, this is or course frustrating for you, but that’s the view held.
    if you want more threads, you may at present need to start them yourself, and hopefully convince other posters to take a deep enough inteterst to start other threads on him.

    Now obviously Bury is a valid candidate for the killer, but that is it.

    The truth is that there is nothing available in the form of evidence which is compelling enough to push him from the possible status to one of probably.

    However, I will add the same applies to all the named suspects at present.

    Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Shaggyrand View Post
    41 topics under his name puts him behind only Druitt, Tumblety, Kosminski, Chapman, Hutchinson, Maybrick and Cross/Lechmere (How does he had 46 threads???). Definitely puts him in the top 10 on the site and there is no way he will get more discussion than Druitt, Chapman or Maybrick, they both have too much drama attached to not discuss them frequently.
    To Shaggyrand

    All the suspects you mention are all what I would consider weak suspects.

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • Shaggyrand
    replied
    41 topics under his name puts him behind only Druitt, Tumblety, Kosminski, Chapman, Hutchinson, Maybrick and Cross/Lechmere (How does he had 46 threads???). Definitely puts him in the top 10 on the site and there is no way he will get more discussion than Druitt, Chapman or Maybrick, they both have too much drama attached to not discuss them frequently.

    Leave a comment:


  • Columbo
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    Many weak suspects get plenty of threads on this site how come Bury who I would consider to be the strongest suspect has relatively few threads?
    There seems to be quite a few. What's missing?

    Columbo

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    Many weak suspects get plenty of threads on this site how come Bury who I would consider to be the strongest suspect has relatively few threads?
    Because no one has started them.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    started a topic Lack of Threads

    Lack of Threads

    Many weak suspects get plenty of threads on this site how come Bury who I would consider to be the strongest suspect has relatively few threads?
Working...
X