Does anything rule Bury out?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • John G
    replied
    Hello Wyatt

    And what should be remembered is that Bury very nearly did get away with it. During the trial Dr Lennox, for the defence, stated that in his view this was a case of suicide rather than homicide, I.e self-strangulation. Dr Kinnear agreed that suicide by strangulation was possible but improbable. However, he was newly qualified, a graduate of less than 6 months. And, of course, Dr Bond concluded that the Rose Mylett case was one of suicide by strangulation.

    Incredibly, after finding Bury guilty the jury recommended mercy on the grounds of the "conflicting medical evidence". This resulted in much laughter throughout the court and the clearly perplexed judge, Lord Young, said that he wasn't prepared to accept such a verdict and sent the jury away to reconsider.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wyatt Earp
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    You don't need to be a criminal mastermind to hop on the first boat out of there.
    Harry, what’s interesting is that Ellen’s sister Margaret testified at Bury’s trial that Bury was talking about going overseas around the time that he sold his horse and cart—going overseas would definitely have been something on his radar. No one here should kid themselves that Bury was too stupid to realize he could have made a run for it. I’d wager that going on “a long journey” was the first thing Bury thought about doing. So why didn’t he do it? He told Lt. Parr that he feared being apprehended as the Ripper, and so I think this prospect of an enormous manhunt—with capture leading to almost certain execution—must indeed have been what held him back.

    Look at what happened with Frank Tumblety. He took your advice, Harry. He adopted a false name, he got on a boat, and he made a run for it. And when he arrived in New York, someone was waiting for him. I think you’re underestimating the ability of the police to track people down, where Bury seems to have been clued into that.

    With respect to the story that Bury took to the police, perhaps his thinking went something like this:

    1. Maybe the police will buy my story, and I won’t be prosecuted.
    2. If they don’t buy my story and I am prosecuted, maybe the jury won’t convict me.
    3. If the jury does convict me, maybe I won’t get the death penalty.

    It’s quite possible that Bury calculated that going to the police with that story gave him better odds of saving his neck.

    What was cracked was not the story of self-strangulation itself—apparently there had been other cases of self-strangulation, and the jury did seem to take the medical testimony for self-strangulation seriously—what was cracked was going to the police with that story given the surrounding circumstances. He’s stuffed Ellen’s body into a trunk, he’s mutilated her genital area, there’s a foot of intestine popping out of her abdomen, and the knife he’s used on her is still sitting on the window sill with blood and flesh and hair on it. Of course most people are going to conclude, “This guy is a maniac, and this must be a case of murder.”

    Originally posted by John G View Post
    Perhaps he was so arrogant he assumed he would get away with it.
    I think you might be right, John. If Bury was a smooth-talking psychopath, he could have been very confident in his ability to fool other people.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    I would hardly call sitting around for days playing cards on a trunk with a body in it panicking.
    Well if going to the police was the result of careful deliberation then he really was a grade A idiot.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    To Harry

    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    Because it would imply that he's not a stone-cold killer but a drunken brute who panicked once his violent temper finally spilled over.
    I would hardly call sitting around for days playing cards on a trunk with a body in it panicking.

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    And again wether Bury's the Ripper or not why the **** and bull story?
    Because it would imply that he's not a stone-cold killer but a drunken brute who panicked once his violent temper finally spilled over.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    To Harry

    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    Hello, John W.

    The 'manhunt' argument doesn't wash. Fleeing the country would've kept his neck out of the hangman's noose for however long. Walking into the police station with that **** n' bull story was signing his own death warrant.
    I disagree the manhunt argument could be applicable wether Bury was the Ripper or not. And again wether Bury's the Ripper or not why the **** and bull story?

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    Bury's behaviour is odd wether he's the Ripper or not. I suspect Bury feared a national manhunt with him as the Ripper if he had just hopped on the first boat out of town and this coupled with as I have previously stated Bury probably having lost it big time mentally at this point he came up with the **** and bull story he went to the police with.

    Cheers John
    Hello, John W.

    The 'manhunt' argument doesn't wash. Fleeing the country would've kept his neck out of the hangman's noose for however long. Walking into the police station with that **** n' bull story was signing his own death warrant.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    To Harry

    Originally posted by Harry D View Post

    You don't need to be a criminal mastermind to hop on the first boat out of there.

    You do, however, have to be a complete moron to come up with the kind of story that Bury gave to the police. 'My wife got drunk and strangled herself, so I mutilated her and bundled her in a box... but I didn't kill her I swear!'
    Bury's behaviour is odd wether he's the Ripper or not. I suspect Bury feared a national manhunt with him as the Ripper if he had just hopped on the first boat out of town and this coupled with as I have previously stated Bury probably having lost it big time mentally at this point he came up with the **** and bull story he went to the police with.

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    To John

    Originally posted by John G View Post

    Perhaps he was so arrogant he assumed he would get away with it. Maybe he was hoping that Dr Bond would become involved. After all, he concluded that Rose Mylett had strangled herself!

    And Peter Sutcliffe hardly impresses me as a criminal mastermind but he was lucky to get away without being caught for several years.
    I absolutely agree with what you are saying. Bury was certainly very arrogant. And when you compare Sutcliffe to Bury as the Ripper then you are comparing like for like in various terms.

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    To Harry

    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    My only idea is that maybe Ellen was his only connection to something resembling a normal life and once he killed her he just completely imploded?
    I believe Bury had lost it big time mentally by the time of Ellen's murder.

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Originally posted by John G View Post
    Hello Harry,

    Perhaps he was so arrogant he assumed he would get away with it. Maybe he was hoping that Dr Bond would become involved. After all, he concluded that Rose Mylett had strangled herself!

    And Peter Sutcliffe hardly impresses me as a criminal mastermind but he was lucky to get away without being caught for several years.
    Hello, John.

    You don't need to be a criminal mastermind to hop on the first boat out of there.

    You do, however, have to be a complete moron to come up with the kind of story that Bury gave to the police. 'My wife got drunk and strangled herself, so I mutilated her and bundled her in a box... but I didn't kill her I swear!'

    Leave a comment:


  • John G
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    I'm really conflicted on Bury. Out of all the named suspects, I'd consider him the best of a bad bunch. Here we have a violent drunk who didn't live far from the murder sites, who randomly upped sticks and went to the opposite end of the country soon after MJK's death, and then was later found guilty of murdering his wife in a 'Ripper-like' fashion. But I also agree with Errata that his behaviour is downright bizarre. The stone-cold killer who murdered women without a sound and melted into the shadows is the same dunce who handed himself into the police with some cockamamie story about suicide when he could've been half-way to America before anyone found out. My only idea is that maybe Ellen was his only connection to something resembling a normal life and once he killed her he just completely imploded?
    Hello Harry,

    Perhaps he was so arrogant he assumed he would get away with it. Maybe he was hoping that Dr Bond would become involved. After all, he concluded that Rose Mylett had strangled herself!

    And Peter Sutcliffe hardly impresses me as a criminal mastermind but he was lucky to get away without being caught for several years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    I'm really conflicted on Bury. Out of all the named suspects, I'd consider him the best of a bad bunch. Here we have a violent drunk who didn't live far from the murder sites, who randomly upped sticks and went to the opposite end of the country soon after MJK's death, and then was later found guilty of murdering his wife in a 'Ripper-like' fashion. But I also agree with Errata that his behaviour is downright bizarre. The stone-cold killer who murdered women without a sound and melted into the shadows is the same dunce who handed himself into the police with some cockamamie story about suicide when he could've been half-way to America before anyone found out. My only idea is that maybe Ellen was his only connection to something resembling a normal life and once he killed her he just completely imploded?

    Leave a comment:


  • Wyatt Earp
    replied
    Originally posted by Errata View Post
    Wait, what does this description have to to do with the Ripper's signature?
    The description of the incident with Ellen doesn't relate to the Ripper's signature. I was simply supplying some additional detail about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Errata
    replied
    Originally posted by Wyatt Earp View Post
    Here’s some additional detail on the second incident with Ellen, in June 1888, from the Telegraph transcript:

    “I think you told me that the second occasion was in a public-house in Whitechapel. When was this?

    I can’t tell you, but it was a Monday in June.

    Can you tell me what he did on that occasion?—Yes; he knocked her down between the upholsterer’s and the public-house.

    Just describe to us what he did exactly?—He lifted his hand and struck her.

    Did he strike her on the head?—No; on the mouth, and the blow was so severe that the woman fell right off. He would have done it again if I had not come and hit him and knocked him away from her. (Laughter.)

    Was he drunk then, too?—Yes, sir.

    What had angered him?—He wanted money to order some drink, and she would not give it to him.”

    Batman has commented on the utter improbability of there being more than one man with the Ripper’s rare signature on the loose in the East End at that time. Well, Bury owns that sig, he was living in the East End at that time, and he wasn’t a copycat. So I say to you, Batman, if you’re gonna talk it, then walk it—Bury’s your man. There’s no need to drag Blotchy or Chapman or some imaginary “medical student” into this thing.
    Wait, what does this description have to to do with the Ripper's signature?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X