This is probably only one of many reports written about this incident so hopefully we may see more details from other inqurieres.
I would be cautous in dismissing it as Bury's based on the handwriting - it is a copy not a photograph therefore will be different, and in any case there are several commonalites despite this that could link it to his handwriting, unusual exaggerated up lifts, variable slant and inconsistent sized lettering. But the long and short of it is you cannot compare handwriting based on third party copies.
Accessable or not (and that is debatable is it not?) provided it was written before the discovery of the body my bet is still on Bury.
And by the by while this is only a very small small part of circumstantial evidence linking him to the Ripper, it shoudlnt be dismissed out of hand imo.
I would be cautous in dismissing it as Bury's based on the handwriting - it is a copy not a photograph therefore will be different, and in any case there are several commonalites despite this that could link it to his handwriting, unusual exaggerated up lifts, variable slant and inconsistent sized lettering. But the long and short of it is you cannot compare handwriting based on third party copies.
Accessable or not (and that is debatable is it not?) provided it was written before the discovery of the body my bet is still on Bury.
And by the by while this is only a very small small part of circumstantial evidence linking him to the Ripper, it shoudlnt be dismissed out of hand imo.
Comment