termini ante quem and a quo
Hello. Permit an observation about coincidences concerning arriving in Whitechapel about the time of the Tabram or Nichols murder and leaving just after Kelly was murdered.
It seems to me that over half the major suspects here on the boards have been given that dubious distinction PRECISELY because their arrival and departure dates coincide with the beginning and ending of the canonical murders and perhaps Tabram. That's why D'Onston, Chapman, Druitt et al. begin to look more attractive as candidates; Ostrog and Cream much less so (and their board activity seems to bear this out).
Doubtless many people arrived in and departed from Whitechapel within this general time frame. But we are looking for one Jack (er, well, maybe). Hence it may be, that there were MANY coincidences here. To illustrate: if D'onston were the Ripper, then Druitt's beginning his visits to his mum and his eventual suicide dates are now coincidences. The same for Chapman's arrival and departure dates.
On the other hand, such "coincidences" cannot be readily discounted and lends, at least, prima facie plausibility to the candidacy. So in any investigations, these dates may well serve as termini ante quem and a quo.
lynn cates
Hello. Permit an observation about coincidences concerning arriving in Whitechapel about the time of the Tabram or Nichols murder and leaving just after Kelly was murdered.
It seems to me that over half the major suspects here on the boards have been given that dubious distinction PRECISELY because their arrival and departure dates coincide with the beginning and ending of the canonical murders and perhaps Tabram. That's why D'Onston, Chapman, Druitt et al. begin to look more attractive as candidates; Ostrog and Cream much less so (and their board activity seems to bear this out).
Doubtless many people arrived in and departed from Whitechapel within this general time frame. But we are looking for one Jack (er, well, maybe). Hence it may be, that there were MANY coincidences here. To illustrate: if D'onston were the Ripper, then Druitt's beginning his visits to his mum and his eventual suicide dates are now coincidences. The same for Chapman's arrival and departure dates.
On the other hand, such "coincidences" cannot be readily discounted and lends, at least, prima facie plausibility to the candidacy. So in any investigations, these dates may well serve as termini ante quem and a quo.
lynn cates
Comment