WH Bury Problems

[Pierre]

Annoyed? Youīd wish. I am enjoying the many opportunitites you provide me with to show how I am correct.

Random posters should really not talk about random witnesses, if they are unable to tell random witnesses apart from witnesses caught of the spot with freshly killed murder victims. Such witnesses can never be random.
Random people are uninteresting, bland people, with nothing extra to offer.

Iīm sure you catch my drift.

I know that you want to trash the Lechmere theory and hurt it in any way you could. And this may sound odd to you, but the best you can do is to keep quiet. Whenever you miss the opportunity to clam up, you do yourself a great disservice.
And that was not what you aimed for, was it?

Bury killed his wife. There is a motive explanation for that.

Lechmere found Polly Nichols. There is a causal explanation for that.

There are no sources connecting Bury or Lechmere to the murders in London 1888-1889. There are no motive explanations. There is nothing.

Bury did not have the signature and he did not have the modus operandi. Nichols was found on Lechmereīs way to work.

[Fisherman]

You're never correct.

I am ever so often, John. But it takes a discerning mind to realize it.

Have you noticed how we are discussing "ripperology" the way you want it again? No facts, no intelligent debate, no moving the case forward.

Just gutter level threats of beating me up if you get the chance.

You are really making SUCH a good case for Bury.

Goodnight, John. Til the next time, eh?

[John Wheat]

Its laughable to read such an argument from a Bury supporter, Ellen's neck hadn't even been cut nor stabbed!

Did the Ripper use strangulation against Kelly or Eddows ?!

Did the Ripper use a rope against any of his victims ?!

And you say you are not sewing a scinario ?!

You turned the Ripper into a Chocker !!


Rainbow°

Yes the Ripper did use strangulation against Kelly and Endows. Do some research.

There is evidence the Ripper used ligature in several of the C5.

[Pierre]

Yes the Ripper did use strangulation against Kelly and Endows. Do some research.

There is evidence the Ripper used ligature in several of the C5.

What is the evidence for the ligature??

[John Wheat]

I am ever so often, John. But it takes a discerning mind to realize it.

Have you noticed how we are discussing "ripperology" the way you want it again? No facts, no intelligent debate, no moving the case forward.

Just gutter level threats of beating me up if you get the chance.

You are really making SUCH a good case for Bury.

Goodnight, John. Til the next time, eh?

What threat? I haven't threatened you.

Fisherman wimps out again. What a surprise.

[John Wheat]

Bury killed his wife. There is a motive explanation for that.

Lechmere found Polly Nichols. There is a causal explanation for that.

There are no sources connecting Bury or Lechmere to the murders in London 1888-1889. There are no motive explanations. There is nothing.

Bury did not have the signature and he did not have the modus operandi. Nichols was found on Lechmereīs way to work.

Either shut the **** up or reveal your theory Pierre.

[John Wheat]

What is the evidence for the ligature??

As I said Pierre either shut the **** up or reveal your theory Pierre.

[Fisherman]

What threat? I haven't threatened you.

Fisherman wimps out again. What a surprise.

"God help you if you ever meet certain people."

Of course you havenīt! That was just a friendly piece of advice.

You see, John, subtlety is not your strongest point. Your strongest point is.. is ... hey, help me out here, somebody?

Goodnight.

Again.

[John Wheat]

"God help you if you ever meet certain people."

Of course you havenīt! That was just a friendly piece of advice.

You see, John subtlety is not your strongest point. Your strongest point is.. is ... hey, help me out here, somebody?

Goodnight.

Again.

It wasn't a threat.

As I said Fisherman wimps out again. What a surprise.

[Fisherman]

It wasn't a threat.

As I said Fisherman wimps out again. What a surprise.

"God help you if you ever meet certain people."

Of course you havenīt! That was just a friendly piece of advice.

You see, John, subtlety is not your strongest point. Your strongest point is.. is ... hey, help me out here, somebody?

Goodnight.

Again.

[John Wheat]

"God help you if you ever meet certain people."

Of course you havenīt! That was just a friendly piece of advice.

You see, John, subtlety is not your strongest point. Your strongest point is.. is ... hey, help me out here, somebody?

Goodnight.

Again.

I have to agree with you, subtlety is not my strong point. I'm about as subtle as a sledgehammer to the face.

[John Wheat]

"God help you if you ever meet certain people."

Of course you havenīt! That was just a friendly piece of advice.

You see, John, subtlety is not your strongest point. Your strongest point is.. is ... hey, help me out here, somebody?

Goodnight.

Again.

Was that a double post?

[Fisherman]

There is a time to call it a day, John. And that is before descending down into these kinds of things. Itīs ugly and unworthy - and, of course, not something the boards are for in the first place.

Stepping back would be wise, therefore.

Goodnight.

Again.

[John Wheat]

There is a time to call it a day, John. And that is before descending down into these kinds of things. Itīs ugly and unworthy - and, of course, not something the boards are for in the first place.

Stepping back would be wise, therefore.

Goodnight.

Again.

You should have stepped back earlier.

[Fisherman]

Before I go and do something useful with my life, I really must say that if anybody wondered what would be the outcome of the title "W H Bury problems", then they really have had their answer by now...