Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WH Bury Problems

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Columbo
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    Abdominal mutilation is itself a rare fetish for a killer, and one that Bury happened to 'share' with the Whitechapel murderer.
    I don't know if it's considered a fetish if you've only done it once.

    The fetish to me wouldn't be the mutilations but the organ removal.

    Columbo

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    Abdominal mutilation is itself a rare fetish for a killer, and one that Bury happened to 'share' with the Whitechapel murderer.
    And MacKenzies killer! And Liz Jacksons killer!

    They must have been around in numbers, the abdominal mutilators.

    Unless you are correct, and it IS a rare fetish.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by paul g View Post
    Just on the subject of comparing the C5 murders and the murder of Bury's wife by Bury.
    There are similarities and one observation I have is when Jack was killing in the east end to a degree there was some planning. The fact that Jack left where ever he lived late at night armed with a knife and materials to strangle took planning no matter weather he suffered from mental issues or not they were to a degree planned .
    When bury murdered his wife it was possible he flipped and murdered straight away without planning, but still similarities to the C5.
    Good point Paul G

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    The problem is that Jack the Ripper was very rare.
    Abdominal mutilation is itself a rare fetish for a killer, and one that Bury happened to 'share' with the Whitechapel murderer.

    Leave a comment:


  • paul g
    replied
    Just on the subject of comparing the C5 murders and the murder of Bury's wife by Bury.
    There are similarities and one observation I have is when Jack was killing in the east end to a degree there was some planning. The fact that Jack left where ever he lived late at night armed with a knife and materials to strangle took planning no matter weather he suffered from mental issues or not they were to a degree planned .
    When bury murdered his wife it was possible he flipped and murdered straight away without planning, but still similarities to the C5.

    Leave a comment:


  • Columbo
    replied
    Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
    Who said you have at all any idea ?!

    you are swimming in the dark......



    Rainbow°
    Thanks, coming from you that means absolutely nothing. I don't have any idea, we're just discussing possibilities.

    Columbo

    Leave a comment:


  • Rainbow
    replied
    Originally posted by Columbo View Post
    We have no idea what kind of guy we're looking for. It could've been a wife killer, wife beater, kid beater or someone who just decided to kill.
    Columbo
    Who said you have at all any idea ?!

    you are swimming in the dark......



    Rainbow°

    Leave a comment:


  • Columbo
    replied
    Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
    Exactly John, we are not looking for a man who happened to kill his wife... this is not our guy, Jack was not a random bad guy John, we are looking for a special bad person with a specific character who wanted to challenge the community and the police at the time with his crimes ..

    a man who wanted to mutilate and expose those poor women to the public, in a manner that gives him the pleasuer and satisfaction he was seeking and would spread the horror all around...

    He was hiding there... between those ordinary people, enjoying their fears and reading their thoughts.. studying the movement of the policemen and the excitement of the moments..


    Bury was a good man comparing to him.. and he paid his life for his guilt that he admitted.



    Rainbow°
    We have no idea what kind of guy we're looking for. It could've been a wife killer, wife beater, kid beater or someone who just decided to kill. You have no idea if he wanted to challenge the police or not, or if he just wanted to see the inside of a woman. Nice try at profiling but I don't think it works here.

    Columbo

    Leave a comment:


  • Rainbow
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    Yes but Bury was murdering his wife. Why would he hang himself? Whereas Lechmere for instance the murder of his wife...oh yeah wait Lechmere has no recorded history of violence.
    Exactly John, we are not looking for a man who happened to kill his wife... this is not our guy, Jack was not a random bad guy John, we are looking for a special bad person with a specific character who wanted to challenge the community and the police at the time with his crimes ..

    a man who wanted to mutilate and expose those poor women to the public, in a manner that gives him the pleasuer and satisfaction he was seeking and would spread the horror all around...

    He was hiding there... between those ordinary people, enjoying their fears and reading their thoughts.. studying the movement of the policemen and the excitement of the moments..


    Bury was a good man comparing to him.. and he paid his life for his guilt that he admitted.



    Rainbow°

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    Hi Harry

    All just coincidences unlike the coincidence of finding a body or happening to live and work near a bunch of murders in an extremely dense population.

    Cheers John
    Check your PMs please, John.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    Did Bury live in the East End during the murders? Yes.

    Did Bury have the means to travel back & forth from Bow to Whitechapel? Yes.

    Was Bury a murderer? Yes.

    Was he a post-mortem mutilator? Yes.

    Did the murders stop/subside after he left London? Yes.

    Hi Harry

    All just coincidences unlike the coincidence of finding a body or happening to live and work near a bunch of murders in an extremely dense population.

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
    to four of the C5 ?!!!!

    Bury's murder looks like a joke when you compare it to Eddowes and Kelly's murders or even Chapmans..

    He was indoor and had all the time to do whatever his sick imagination wanted...

    even the position of the victims was important when you approach Jack's real MO

    Not a strangled woman found in a box...?!


    Rainbow°

    Yes but Bury was murdering his wife. Why would he hang himself? Whereas Lechmere for instance the murder of his wife...oh yeah wait Lechmere has no recorded history of violence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Did Bury live in the East End during the murders? Yes.

    Did Bury have the means to travel back & forth from Bow to Whitechapel? Yes.

    Was Bury a murderer? Yes.

    Was he a post-mortem mutilator? Yes.

    Did the murders stop/subside after he left London? Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rainbow
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    let alone murder with a knife and with similar MO to four of the C5?

    Cheers John
    to four of the C5 ?!!!!

    Bury's murder looks like a joke when you compare it to Eddowes and Kelly's murders or even Chapmans..

    He was indoor and had all the time to do whatever his sick imagination wanted...

    even the position of the victims was important when you approach Jack's real MO

    Not a strangled woman found in a box...?!


    Rainbow°

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
    No, it does not. I cannot even completely exonerate Amelia Cox of 29 Hanbury Street of being JTR. But I can say that she is very, very unlikely to have been JTR. Bury is less unlikely - he is in fact a person of some little interest - but he is nevertheless an unlikely JTR just the same. And that is why we need to hypothesize a good deal to enhance his chances.
    I cannot exonerate Lechmere of being JTR but I can say he is very, very unlikely to have been JTR. Possibly marginally more likely to have been JTR than Amelia Cox of 29 Hanbury Street. Bury now he could quite easily have been JTR.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X