Joseph Barnett, Mary Kelly, and the other victims

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • clark2710
    Detective
    • Apr 2010
    • 241

    #1

    Joseph Barnett, Mary Kelly, and the other victims

    Is there anything to show that Barnett was close or associated with the other Ripper victims since the ladies knew each other was he part of their circle so to speak? Man was covered in blood when Abberline questioned him but was still permitted to leave. Today, you go to police covered in blood, unless you work at a slaughter house, they caught you WHILE WORKING, and pull your butt into the interrogation room right after you'd think that'd be a huge red flag?!? Did Abberline let him go because of the police technology at the time not being able to test blood all that conclusively? Was Barnett ever seen in the company of the others or just Kelly?
  • c.d.
    Commissioner
    • Feb 2008
    • 6550

    #2
    Hello Clark,

    I have never heard this before. What is your source for stating that Barnett was covered in blood when questioned?

    c.d.

    Comment

    • Astatine211
      Detective
      • Nov 2020
      • 200

      #3
      When he was questioned by the police for four hours his clothes were examined for blood but non was found on them.

      Comment

      • clark2710
        Detective
        • Apr 2010
        • 241

        #4
        Originally posted by c.d. View Post
        Hello Clark,

        I have never heard this before. What is your source for stating that Barnett was covered in blood when questioned?

        c.d.
        In the Wiki under Jospeh Barnett in the Mary Kelly entry here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_J...#Investigation

        Comment

        • clark2710
          Detective
          • Apr 2010
          • 241

          #5
          Originally posted by Astatine211 View Post
          When he was questioned by the police for four hours his clothes were examined for blood but non was found on them.
          ah I misread it says "his clothes were examined for bloodstains," I totally misread that; my apologies

          Comment

          • clark2710
            Detective
            • Apr 2010
            • 241

            #6
            However, my question still stands, being questioned for four hours tells me that at least for a short time he was considered a suspect. I would still like to know if the other victims knew him, hung out with him, etc or was he just a friend/partner or Kelly?

            Comment

            • c.d.
              Commissioner
              • Feb 2008
              • 6550

              #7
              I would probably change "suspect" to "person of interest" although the two are very close terms. I am not aware of any interaction that he had with the other victims.

              c.d.

              Comment

              • Astatine211
                Detective
                • Nov 2020
                • 200

                #8
                Originally posted by clark2710 View Post
                However, my question still stands, being questioned for four hours tells me that at least for a short time he was considered a suspect. I would still like to know if the other victims knew him, hung out with him, etc or was he just a friend/partner or Kelly?
                He was definitely considered a serious suspect. In 1908, 20 years after the murders Robert Anderson did an interview in which he implicated Barnett as the Ripper before switching to Kosminski in 1910. This shows he was on the police radar as a suspect until many of their deaths and he was never fully dismissed even if it seemed like it.

                I would guess that Barnett and Eddowes almost certainly knew each other, even if just as acquaintances. Due to it being almost guaranteed they were regulars at the same pub. However, I also feel this is one of the biggest issues with Barnett's candidacy as the Ripper as he was most likely very well known to many locals, so surely one of the witnesses would be able to easily identify him. There are some interesting theories about his brother being the true culprit but there isn't much evidence at all to support this.

                Comment

                • Al Bundy's Eyes
                  Chief Inspector
                  • Sep 2019
                  • 1776

                  #9
                  Originally posted by clark2710 View Post
                  However, my question still stands, being questioned for four hours tells me that at least for a short time he was considered a suspect. I would still like to know if the other victims knew him, hung out with him, etc or was he just a friend/partner or Kelly?
                  Likely he was, if the police were doing their job. Then dismissed.

                  Did he know the other victims? Maybe. If he did there's nothing in the historical register that even remotely suggests that, so it's a non starter.
                  Thems the Vagaries.....

                  Comment

                  • richardnunweek
                    Superintendent
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 2420

                    #10
                    Hi
                    About twenty years ago on here, I started a thread 'Joseph Barnett Number one suspect.' It was well received . He still is a possible , along with Joe Fleming. The main doubt is Motive, for Mary maybe, the others No,
                    Regards Richard.

                    Comment

                    • Michael W Richards
                      Inactive
                      • May 2012
                      • 7122

                      #11
                      Originally posted by richardnunweek View Post
                      Hi
                      About twenty years ago on here, I started a thread 'Joseph Barnett Number one suspect.' It was well received . He still is a possible , along with Joe Fleming. The main doubt is Motive, for Mary maybe, the others No,
                      Regards Richard.
                      It is speculated that Flemming was the other "Joe", we actually dont know that for sure. What we can say is that it would seem that Mary was seeing 2 Joes simultaneously which can often result in a violent end for someone in that sort of triangle. Im sure the "other" Joe is a more interesting potential suspect, maybe moreso if it was Flemming.

                      Comment

                      • Scott Nelson
                        Superintendent
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 2401

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Astatine211 View Post
                        In 1908, 20 years after the murders Robert Anderson did an interview in which he implicated Barnett as the Ripper before switching to Kosminski in 1910.
                        I'm not too sure about this. What did Sir Robert say?

                        Comment

                        • MrBarnett
                          *
                          • Nov 2013
                          • 5672

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post

                          It is speculated that Flemming was the other "Joe", we actually dont know that for sure. What we can say is that it would seem that Mary was seeing 2 Joes simultaneously which can often result in a violent end for someone in that sort of triangle. Im sure the "other" Joe is a more interesting potential suspect, maybe moreso if it was Flemming.
                          Joe could be short for Johannes, of course.

                          Comment

                          • Wickerman
                            Commissioner
                            • Oct 2008
                            • 14864

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post

                            I'm not too sure about this. What did Sir Robert say?
                            You echoed my thoughts.
                            Regards, Jon S.

                            Comment

                            • rjpalmer
                              Commissioner
                              • Mar 2008
                              • 4237

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post

                              I'm not too sure about this. What did Sir Robert say?

                              In the September 1, 1908 Daily Chronicle interview, Anderson mentions a clay pipe found at a murder scene, but it was smashed in a fireplace by a careless doctor.

                              Barnett theorists use this statement to suggest that Anderson suspected Barnett, because he smoked a clay pipe.

                              Which seems like a heck of a stretch.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X