Good day to all
So I wanted to ask for some feedback regarding suspects in the case.
i have looked fairly extensively at some of the threads covering the topic of suspects and I have noticed that despite some truly amazing viewpoints, there can sometimes be a lack of cohesion in terms of bringing data together for the sake of forming statistical analysis of said suspects.
It’s not about agreeing of course, but if we were to try and collate data and contrasting viewpoints on any given suspect, it may give a greater deal of statistical accuracy in terms of which suspects are at the forefront of the investigation.
in other words, I wanted to try and find a way that we could analyse the statistical accuracy of suspects and find a way of demonstrating that more collectively than has previously been done.
so how to do this?
well there are several ways but one of the most directly obvious ways is in the form of a league table.
so I propose to start a league table of suspects based on each individual persons own beliefs. This may seem like a strange way to rank the likelihood of suspects, but I believe that if enough of us get involved and jump on board with this then I truly believe that it will be effective than first realised.
So let’s say that we go for a top 4 for each person on this site, it I’ll quickly build into a more cohesive picture of where the true answers are more likely to be hiding.
now as an aside to this, I appreciate than many of you have already chose their suspect with no room for manoeuvre. So let’s work with that too. But of course, if you only choose 1 suspect, as your first, second and third choice, that will only count once instead of 4 times.
so let’s say we use a scoring system for our Suspect League...
1st choice gets 10 points
2nd choice gets 5 points
3rd choice gets 2 points
4th choice gets 1 point
so let’s try it (and if it fails then we haven’t lost anything anyway)
I will begin proceedings by stating my top 4
1 Lechmere
2 Hutchinson
3 McCarthy
4 Sutton
I will I’ll be happy to regularly keep track of the league once enough people add their own top 4.
Hoping that enough of us will get involved and see where it takes us.
Top 4 please
TRD
So I wanted to ask for some feedback regarding suspects in the case.
i have looked fairly extensively at some of the threads covering the topic of suspects and I have noticed that despite some truly amazing viewpoints, there can sometimes be a lack of cohesion in terms of bringing data together for the sake of forming statistical analysis of said suspects.
It’s not about agreeing of course, but if we were to try and collate data and contrasting viewpoints on any given suspect, it may give a greater deal of statistical accuracy in terms of which suspects are at the forefront of the investigation.
in other words, I wanted to try and find a way that we could analyse the statistical accuracy of suspects and find a way of demonstrating that more collectively than has previously been done.
so how to do this?
well there are several ways but one of the most directly obvious ways is in the form of a league table.
so I propose to start a league table of suspects based on each individual persons own beliefs. This may seem like a strange way to rank the likelihood of suspects, but I believe that if enough of us get involved and jump on board with this then I truly believe that it will be effective than first realised.
So let’s say that we go for a top 4 for each person on this site, it I’ll quickly build into a more cohesive picture of where the true answers are more likely to be hiding.
now as an aside to this, I appreciate than many of you have already chose their suspect with no room for manoeuvre. So let’s work with that too. But of course, if you only choose 1 suspect, as your first, second and third choice, that will only count once instead of 4 times.
so let’s say we use a scoring system for our Suspect League...
1st choice gets 10 points
2nd choice gets 5 points
3rd choice gets 2 points
4th choice gets 1 point
so let’s try it (and if it fails then we haven’t lost anything anyway)
I will begin proceedings by stating my top 4
1 Lechmere
2 Hutchinson
3 McCarthy
4 Sutton
I will I’ll be happy to regularly keep track of the league once enough people add their own top 4.
Hoping that enough of us will get involved and see where it takes us.
Top 4 please
TRD
Comment