How easy was it to disappear?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • kensei
    replied
    I remember there was a quote about the Ripper's ability to disappear that said he seemed to just "drop through a trapdoor in the earth," and there is one theory that that might be exactly what he did- used sewers or underground rail tunnels to make his escapes. I'm not saying that's what I believe but it might be good to include in a novel.

    Leave a comment:


  • somerset
    replied
    Hullo, Sarge.

    Do you think Jack was hiding in plain sight on the nights of the murders, catching a tram or simply walking along Commercial and Whitechapel Roads, or do you see him stalking anywhere but there, meeting his victims solely in the alleys and backstreets where they were found? Or perhaps both on different nights?

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Or do you mean wave a magic wand, say abracadabra and poof you're gone,

    Leave a comment:


  • Errata
    replied
    When you talk about disappearing, are you talking about the ability to get out of England and become a tailor in Chicago named John Tanaka never to get caught kind of disappear?

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by Hakeswill View Post

    For the Mitre Square attack, I've alays been suspicious of PC Harvey's account. If you assume that his reports were not entirely accurate (he was dismissed in 1889 for a conduct issue) then the timings of Lawende, Watkins and the attack become more plausible. The square and the surrounding streets are much tighter than you might suppose from reading the reports, so yes, the killer was extraordinarily fortunate not to be detected. That's why I personally feel that some of the reports from the night were either confused or deliberately obfuscated. Harvey seems the most likely source of error.
    Placing blame on a constable is a tough sell, we like to think they were honest, hard working, dedicated, even if underpaid, so pointing the finger at one doesn't get much support. It tends to go against the grain, even though we know some constables did not live up to the impeccable image we have created.

    Others have suggested that Watkins may have been taking an unscheduled tea break with the nightwatchman instead of religiously pounding the beat that night.

    If timing is the issue for you, the better way to go might be to acknowledge an observation made by Swanson, that the witness Lawende, "identified the clothes only, of the murdered woman Eddowes, which is a serious drawback to the value of the description of the man."

    The implication being, that the woman may not have been Eddowes afterall, that the killer may have been in Mitre Square already by 1:30 am, or immediately after Watkins left. So that helps to solve your timing issue. And, it is a more acceptable theory seeing that Lawende was never given the opportunity to identify Eddowes in the mortuary.
    Maybe the woman he saw was not Eddowes.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlanG
    replied
    I would read 'the bank holiday murders'. It's a really good thought provoking book. There is also a fairly recent podcast. Perhaps for your novel you could link in some elements of that to lend realism. Also try and link into that an internal police conspiracy and I can imagine a very exciting novel. Though I couldn't write it myself haha

    Good luck with it though whatever you decide to do
    Last edited by AlanG; 04-15-2015, 01:11 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hakeswill
    replied
    A bigger problem from your perspective is that though it was unlikely that the murderer could have got away unseen and not apprehended at the two crime scenes, he clearly did exactly that. You have to make the implausible sound feasible.

    Berner Street seemed to be bu almost buzzing with activity around the time, given the claims of various witnesses. It's even more startling when you realise how physically close some of these people were to events. Matthew Packer for instance was literally yards away (his 'evidence' non-withstanding). As to ecape from Berner Street, assuming he didn't head north towards (still a possibility), the junction at the south of the street ran south, east and west. It wouldn't be difficult to get too far away in a relatively short time, even without the presence of alleys and courts. Lighting quality qould have played a factor in easily spotting people, as would willingness of people to look out of a door or window in response to a commotion. From the variations on Schwarz's testimony (i.e. an assault occuring yards away from a beer house and opposite domestic dwellings it wouldn't be unreasonable to suggest people weren't twitching tehir curtains at every noise or we may have other witnesses to the events.

    For the Mitre Square attack, I've alays been suspicious of PC Harvey's account. If you assume that his reports were not entirely accurate (he was dismissed in 1889 for a conduct issue) then the timings of Lawende, Watkins and the attack become more plausible. The square and the surrounding streets are much tighter than you might suppose from reading the reports, so yes, the killer was extraordinarily fortunate not to be detected. That's why I personally feel that some of the reports from the night were either confused or deliberately obfuscated. Harvey seems the most likely source of error.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlanG
    replied
    Well depending on who you converse with, it has been argued that the ripper was actually caught at the bucks row crime scene (Cross)

    Others would debunk this argument.

    I try to think what the most logical explanation could be. I finally get an idea in my mind then read an argument that completely throws me again!

    Leave a comment:


  • YankeeSergeant
    replied
    Eddowes

    See, that is part of my dilemma. I think he likely should have been caught at either the Stride or Eddowes killing. Jackie was one lucky boy

    Leave a comment:


  • AlanG
    replied
    I am sure others will have their opinion on that fact though!

    Leave a comment:


  • AlanG
    replied
    How the killer got away from the Eddowes murder scene I simply have no idea. Did the killer miss the bobby beat by minutes or simply blend into the crowd.

    Leave a comment:


  • YankeeSergeant
    started a topic How easy was it to disappear?

    How easy was it to disappear?

    Although I've seen pictures of Whitechapel and Spitalfields, I have yet to visit. So, forgive me if this seems like a stupid question, but how easy was it to disappear in Whitechapel or Spitalfields? From the pictures I've seen, the accounts I've read in books, articles and here on the boards it seems to me it would be fairly easy. I'm in edits on a novel I'm writing about Jack the Ripper and Just want to be sure all my ducks are in a row. Thanks in advance.
Working...
X