Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Juwes Graffiti

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Losmandris
    replied
    Originally posted by caz View Post

    I just can't see anyone taking the time to murder and mutilate defenceless women on the streets - but there it is.

    Someone took the time to write that message, and wasn't seen doing it, so I don't see it as a stretch if it was the same person who risked having his neck stretched that night.

    Love,

    Caz
    X
    I see your point Caz. And of course there is ever chance that he did write said graffiti but for me, with all other things relating to MO and what we have still surviving as evidence, it doesn't add up for him to do it. I am yet to be convinced. There is a little bit too much tail chasing in this instance I think, too much scope for the development of conspiracy theories.

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Do you mean in a "he wanks as high as anyone in Wome" way?

    Perhaps he didn't know his Rs from his Ws.

    If the word had been Jewry [which sounds like jury], you'd have had more of a point.

    Love,

    Caz
    X

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by caz View Post

    I don't agree, Trev. When you say "jurors" properly, it's nothing like Juwes. More like "jourers".

    Love,

    Caz
    X
    Of course it does whats the matter with you? and if you couldnt spell jurors correctly its a perfect fit.

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

    thats right but the word jurors is not so easy to spell, and is spelt how some may pronounce it Juwes!!!!!!!!!

    www.trevormarriott.co.uk
    I don't agree, Trev. When you say "jurors" properly, it's nothing like Juwes. More like "jourers".

    Love,

    Caz
    X

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Originally posted by Losmandris View Post
    I often wonder if rather than actually writing the graffiti the killer intentionally placed the rag underneath as a bit of a joke or to wind up the authorities? It may be that for whatever reason he wanted the rag to be found. If so placing under the graffiti would have made this easier. he may not of even been aware of what it said. If either was the case he certainly achieved his goal. For me I just can t see him taking the time to write the graffiti, its too far a stretch for me.
    I just can't see anyone taking the time to murder and mutilate defenceless women on the streets - but there it is.

    Someone took the time to write that message, and wasn't seen doing it, so I don't see it as a stretch if it was the same person who risked having his neck stretched that night.

    Love,

    Caz
    X

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by caz View Post

    That's why I suspect the spelling of 'Juwes' was deliberate, Trev.

    Jews - common knowledge, easy enough to spell and topical.

    No other spelling mistakes.

    Love,

    Caz
    X
    thats right but the word jurors is not so easy to spell, and is spelt how some may pronounce it Juwes!!!!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

    Why would anyone want to use the term Juwes to describe an ethnic group when the term Jews was common knowledge and easily spelt. After all the writer of the graffiti managed to make no other spelling mistakes, and besides the writer was specific about the gender he was referring to.

    www.trevormarriott.co.uk
    That's why I suspect the spelling of 'Juwes' was deliberate, Trev.

    Jews - common knowledge, easy enough to spell and topical.

    No other spelling mistakes.

    Love,

    Caz
    X

    Leave a comment:


  • Losmandris
    replied
    I often wonder if rather than actually writing the graffiti the killer intentionally placed the rag underneath as a bit of a joke or to wind up the authorities? It may be that for whatever reason he wanted the rag to be found. If so placing under the graffiti would have made this easier. he may not of even been aware of what it said. If either was the case he certainly achieved his goal. For me I just can t see him taking the time to write the graffiti, its too far a stretch for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • erobitha
    replied
    Originally posted by paul g View Post
    Totally out of the box here.
    if the GSG and apron piece along with the initials on the wall were clues or possible “ teasers” left by Jack is there anything else at the other murder sites that could be considered the same , including non C5 victims .
    Let's assume they are both actual clues. It means they were both some form of message.

    Which means he wants to communicate something of importance to him at those times. It does not mean that at every murder he commits he feels compelled to leave a message.

    The C5 victims are classed as such because of the similarities in which they were murdered. If there were any other "clues" it is more likely at those murder sites than a non C5 victim.

    Leave a comment:


  • Al Bundy's Eyes
    replied
    Originally posted by clark2710 View Post

    That's what I'm thinking, that people may be over thinking this, he did have misspellings in his letters as well if memory serves. He laughed at the idea of him being thought a doctor. But that could've been a rouse too. But some Ripper evidence is over thought in my opinion.
    That depends entirely on whether you attribute any of the letters to the killer in the first place.

    Leave a comment:


  • paul g
    replied
    Totally out of the box here.
    if the GSG and apron piece along with the initials on the wall were clues or possible “ teasers” left by Jack is there anything else at the other murder sites that could be considered the same , including non C5 victims .

    Leave a comment:


  • clark2710
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post

    hi clark
    i think its probably more of the case the ripper just spelled it wrong-intentionally or not.
    That's what I'm thinking, that people may be over thinking this, he did have misspellings in his letters as well if memory serves. He laughed at the idea of him being thought a doctor. But that could've been a rouse too. But some Ripper evidence is over thought in my opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by clark2710 View Post
    in the message, The Juwes are not the men who will be blamed for nothing, I've read about it being a dialect of the region indicating a certain type person, that the misspelling indicating the writer was a certain nationality. Which are believed to be more believable?
    hi clark
    i think its probably more of the case the ripper just spelled it wrong-intentionally or not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by erobitha View Post

    Ah, ye 'Olde English' example. I have found versions of this hymn / carol where Jews is spelt correctly.

    I have deliberately avoided using examples from Old English for these reasons.

    For those who are interested, this is a carol from the 15th Century called "Man, Be Glad in Halle and Bour".
    Why would anyone want to use the term Juwes to describe an ethnic group when the term Jews was common knowledge and easily spelt. After all the writer of the graffiti managed to make no other spelling mistakes, and besides the writer was specific about the gender he was referring to.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    We have no way of knowing of course but if the killer did have knowledge of Olde English this again points to a higher level of education.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X