I'm making a video which involves arguing against this depiction. I need help in determining if these objections are reasonable...
The popular image of Jack the Ripper is of a shadowy figure, dressed in gentleman's clothes, a long cloak, and a top hat.
But that's only a myth. Why?
Well, I've heard a number of reasons why he wouldn't have been able to wear such an upper-class outfit.
1) People with money would've preferred West End prostitutes. They wouldn't have gone to the East End.
2) These clothes would've drawn suspicion to him.
3) Prostitutes wouldn't have trusted him.
4) He would've been caught.
How did this image come into being?
The popular image of Jack the Ripper is of a shadowy figure, dressed in gentleman's clothes, a long cloak, and a top hat.
But that's only a myth. Why?
Well, I've heard a number of reasons why he wouldn't have been able to wear such an upper-class outfit.
1) People with money would've preferred West End prostitutes. They wouldn't have gone to the East End.
2) These clothes would've drawn suspicion to him.
3) Prostitutes wouldn't have trusted him.
4) He would've been caught.
How did this image come into being?
Comment