Seaside Home?

[lynn cates]

distance

Hello Trevor. But at least it would not be quite so far.

Cheers.
LC

[Trevor Marriott]

Hi Lynn

I have added to my previous post in one here.

It doesnt matter where the seaside home was the same would still apply

[lynn cates]

Brighton?

Hello Trevor. Thanks.

But do we know that it was Brighton?

Cheers.
LC

[lynn cates]

My Lord!

Hello Jeff. Hmm, I have a 1000+ page report on the sweating inquiry. I could have a go at that.

What alternate names did Crawford have? Sometimes the Lords used various names/titles.

Cheers.
LC

[Jeff Leahy]

Hello Jeff. But for the Crawford letter to refer to Kosminski's family, we would need to believe that a poor immigrant family had access to a member of the peerage.

Was that usual?Cheers.
LC

I think the theory put forward was that Crawford was on a commision / equirary? Into Sweating practices..

Far from being poor the Kosminski's were comparatively wealthy family producing Mantles from their Tailouring work shop..a sweater shop

It has been proposed that Aaron might have been a night watchman for teh premises which was just over the road from Berner Street..

Something that couldnt have gone un-noticed by Swanson, hence why he sort out Schwartz as a witness...

As that workshop was also a local employer I've also always wondered if Schwartz new it or even worked there?

But all speculation of course

Yours Jeff

PS I've also speculated that the workshop would have had chemicals in its manufacture process...Schizophrenia psychosis requires some sort of trigger..

[lynn cates]

respectable

Hello Phil.

"Especially those whose family member in question allegedly masturbating his member in a public gutter!"

Which brings up the question, "Isn't the family being described a "respectable" one?" After all, they seem worried about the family name.

Cheers.
LC

[Phil Carter]

Hello Jeff. But for the Crawford letter to refer to Kosminski's family, we would need to believe that a poor immigrant family had access to a member of the peerage.

Was that usual?

Cheers.
LC

Hello Lynn,

Especially those whose family member in question allegedly masturbating his member in a public gutter!
Perhaps the peer was a dog lover? Hehe
After all "We cant prove he wasn't"

kindly

Phil

[Trevor Marriott]

And I would say yes if they felt there was certainly going to be no trial, though Id expect some correspondence of sorts to have been made.

However the crux is the statement that the witness refused to give testimony, this would indicate that they were indeed looking at a trial.

Therefore, in that case, Id be argeement with Trevor.

Twice in a day....I need a lie down.

Monty

Your commission just went uo to 25%

[lynn cates]

peerage

Hello Jeff. But for the Crawford letter to refer to Kosminski's family, we would need to believe that a poor immigrant family had access to a member of the peerage.

Was that usual?

Cheers.
LC

[lynn cates]

thought

Hello Neil. Thanks. Just a stray thought.

Cheers.
LC

[lynn cates]

trial balloon

Hello Trevor. I did not think the probability high. I just wondered if it were some spur of the moment thing--like a trial balloon--to see what they could glean. (Stewart Evans' conjecture is still better--in my opinion.)

Cheers.
LC

[Jeff Leahy]

Almost three hours a record Trevor

If Schwartz was confronted with Kosmnski it seems reasonable to assume that the aim of that task was to try and get a confession. This would have been thew simplest and most reasonable answer to such an event..

..and he new he was recognised..

If the Canarvan letter was from Aaron's sister it might also help confirm what she already suspected and had told Anderson..

[Monty]

Originally Posted by lynn cates

Hello Trevor, Harry, Neil. Although I do not fully comprehend police business, is there a possibility of an informal identification? Something like a "feeler"?

Cheers.
LC

And I would say yes if they felt there was certainly going to be no trial, though Id expect some correspondence of sorts to have been made.

However the crux is the statement that the witness refused to give testimony, this would indicate that they were indeed looking at a trial.

Therefore, in that case, Id be argeement with Trevor.

Twice in a day....I need a lie down.

Monty

[Trevor Marriott]

Hello Trevor, Harry, Neil. Although I do not fully comprehend police business, is there a possibility of an informal identification? Something like a "feeler"?

Cheers.
LC

I would say no and I have to ask on what basis and what evidence or suspicion was this ever conducted as i said in an earlier post there is absolutley nothing if it happened in all the information wether it be written or otherwise to corroborate this.

[Jeff Leahy]

1)

This coment has nothing to do with proving the existance of the Seaside Home identification. Deflection away from topic

Denialist Ripperology is relivant to the Seaside home if its protagonists are trying to change history by claiming it didn’t happen.

2)

Err.. NO POLICEMEN.... AARON Kosminski is NOT mentioned. Fact.

Phil its been explained to you endlessly that Aaron Kosminski was the only Kosminski ever found in records that matches ‘Kosminski’ Despite the great and good searching endlessly through eons of time…None, not one , body else, not even a slight match.

However what we know about Aaron Kosminski uncannily matches what we know about ‘Kosminski’ So if it looks like a duck, waddles like a duck, and goes quack…are we going with the Denialist Idea that it’s a racing pigeon? Or can we just call it a Duck?

3)

This has nothing to do with the facts of the alleged Seaside Home Identification. which is what the thread is about. Deflection away from topic

Its perfectly reasonable to ask whether denying the existence of the Seaside Home ID might be fueled by other motives or pushing forward other preferred theories. Its in the Nature of Denialist History

6)

This has nothing to do with the facts surrounding the identification of the Seaside Home which is what the thread is about. Deflection away from topic.

Then why mention it?

Thank you ladies and gentlemen for your balanced thoughts on the matter. I presented facts, the reply from an "expert" Kosminskiite, is above.

Next? kindlyPhil

You have not presented the FACTS you have presented your opinion. Dressing Denialist History in Syrope doesnt make it anything other than what it is..

Yours Jeff