What disturbs me greatly is the fact that those attempting, with utter futility, to claim that the man Lawende saw wasn't Eddowes' killer are the same people who usually insist on making crass comparisons between "Mr. Astrakhan" and some implausible favourite suspect of theirs. They claim, on the one hand, that Jack the Ripper was some kind of invisible silly phantom who was never seen, but then as soon as it's Mr. Astrakhan it's "Ooh, he was well-dressed just like Druitt!" It piddles me off, and it's absurdly easy to see through.
The only reason people reject Lawende's sighting is because it doesn't gel together very well with the various "toff" suspects that get bandied around. There's absolutely no other justification for ignoring the far more likely scenario that Lawende and company observed Kate with her killer, other than an irrational aversion to rough and shabby local unglamorous rippers. As I've mentioned before, the chances of the killer never being seen in the company of his victims in so dense and nocturnal a population as the one we're dealing with are effectively zero. Lawende didn't merely state that the clothes were "similar" or "black". He believed that they were the same, and positive IDs have been established on much less. It certainly seems as though the police placed credence in it.
Sorry, Nats, but how on earth can you know that? We don't know who the ripper was because his identity was never established. How do we know that he wasn't seen at all or most crime scenes?
The only reason people reject Lawende's sighting is because it doesn't gel together very well with the various "toff" suspects that get bandied around. There's absolutely no other justification for ignoring the far more likely scenario that Lawende and company observed Kate with her killer, other than an irrational aversion to rough and shabby local unglamorous rippers. As I've mentioned before, the chances of the killer never being seen in the company of his victims in so dense and nocturnal a population as the one we're dealing with are effectively zero. Lawende didn't merely state that the clothes were "similar" or "black". He believed that they were the same, and positive IDs have been established on much less. It certainly seems as though the police placed credence in it.
The man Lawende saw was allowing his face to be seen while his chest was being stroked.That wasnt the Ripper!
Comment