What influenced the Ripper?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Geddy2112
    Inspector
    • Dec 2015
    • 1387

    #16
    Originally posted by FrankO View Post
    Hi Ian,

    I agree that anybody who would cut open a human woman and pull and/or cut out one or more organs it would look like that. But that's not the question here. The way I look at it, RD's question lies before that: why would anybody want to open up a female body? Why would anybody want to cut and pull out slippery organs?
    Indeed curiosity killed the cat etc. It's like a lot of questions we ask here, there is no right or wrong answer and a lot of maybes or maybe nots. We are sometimes told that pornography makes someone with a certain mindset go out and commit rape so yes I assume by that analogy seeing a wax work of a human body opened up might 'inspire' the viewer to see for themselves in the flesh so to speak.

    The closest we got at school unless you followed the biology route in higher education was cutting open a rat and sitting there astonished at how long it's small intestine was. I've not heard anyone in my year group went on to do this to a human though. Nevertheless the practice has been shelved.

    Also to add my apologies to The Rookie Detective my intention is not to cause arguments...
    Jack the Ripper - Double Cross

    Comment

    • Patrick Differ
      Detective
      • Dec 2024
      • 333

      #17
      Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post

      Some of the Pro-Lechmere theorists claim he was influenced by the Wax works of the anatomical Venus that was on display in the West End.

      https://forum.casebook.org/forum/rip...d-he-have-paid
      Thats interesting. There seems to be alot more sources to educate the Ripper then one might imagine.

      Comment

      • The Rookie Detective
        Chief Inspector
        • Apr 2019
        • 1962

        #18
        Originally posted by FrankO View Post
        Hi Ian,

        I agree that anybody who would cut open a human woman and pull and/or cut out one or more organs it would look like that. But that's not the question here. The way I look at it, RD's question lies before that: why would anybody want to open up a female body? Why would anybody want to cut and pull out slippery organs?

        If he hated women so much, he could have just strangled them, stabbed or bludgeoned them to death or just have cut her throat (or any combination of that) and have left them like that. Seeing that he committed his first and most murders out in the streets, that would have been much less risky than sticking around to lay her down, work up her skirts, open up their abdomen, andsoforth. So, it's a very fair thing to wonder what sparked his interest in cutting his victims' abdomen up, etc.. and the idea of these anatomical wax models as an answer is a good one. Of course, we have no way of knowing if it's the right answer, but it's a good one nevertheless.

        Cheers,
        Frank
        Precisely my point and one of the best posts I've read on these boards for a very long time.

        "Great minds, don't think alike"

        Comment

        • Doctored Whatsit
          Sergeant
          • May 2021
          • 718

          #19
          The concept that JtR's blood lust might have been inspired by anatomical wax models was suggested by Christer Holmgren in "Cutting Point", but whether he was or wasn't is unknown and unknowable. What is known is that JtR possessed considerable knife skills, and used a knife with a 6-8 inch blade quickly and efficiently. He knew how to kill swiftly and silently, how to remove innards with one sweep of the knife, and how to avoid getting much blood on his person. This was therefore not an otherwise ordinary man turned on to evil by the sight of an opened up wax torso. A person with the necessary skills might have been a butcher/slaughterer or a demented physician for example, and he would have had experience of cutting up bodies anyway, and wouldn't have needed such inspiration.

          For the wax models to be a relevant inspiration we need to think what type of person is likely to have the considerable specific skills mentioned above without having cut up a body already, and I think that is unlikely. Of course, the wax models could have been the original inspiration, and as a result JtR became a physician or a butcher.

          Comment

          • FrankO
            Superintendent
            • Feb 2008
            • 2137

            #20
            Originally posted by Doctored Whatsit View Post
            The concept that JtR's blood lust might have been inspired by anatomical wax models was suggested by Christer Holmgren in "Cutting Point", but whether he was or wasn't is unknown and unknowable. What is known is that JtR possessed considerable knife skills, and used a knife with a 6-8 inch blade quickly and efficiently. He knew how to kill swiftly and silently, how to remove innards with one sweep of the knife, and how to avoid getting much blood on his person. This was therefore not an otherwise ordinary man turned on to evil by the sight of an opened up wax torso. A person with the necessary skills might have been a butcher/slaughterer or a demented physician for example, and he would have had experience of cutting up bodies anyway, and wouldn't have needed such inspiration.

            For the wax models to be a relevant inspiration we need to think what type of person is likely to have the considerable specific skills mentioned above without having cut up a body already, and I think that is unlikely. Of course, the wax models could have been the original inspiration, and as a result JtR became a physician or a butcher.
            Hi DW,

            Based on your reply, I think I haven't expressed myself the best I could. What I wrote suggested that the wax models sparked the Ripper's interest in cutting his victims' abdomen up, etc., but your post actually made me realize that that's not really how I see it. I think that, for whatever reason, he already had an interest in cutting up female bodies (long) before he started doing it. That might have drawn him to becoming a butcher or even a surgeon or any profession where he could use his knife cutting into flesh. The wax models may just have fine-tuned his fantasy or added something to it.

            Cheers,
            Frank
            "You can rob me, you can starve me and you can beat me and you can kill me. Just don't bore me."
            Clint Eastwood as Gunny in "Heartbreak Ridge"

            Comment

            • Doctored Whatsit
              Sergeant
              • May 2021
              • 718

              #21
              Originally posted by FrankO View Post
              Hi DW,

              Based on your reply, I think I haven't expressed myself the best I could. What I wrote suggested that the wax models sparked the Ripper's interest in cutting his victims' abdomen up, etc., but your post actually made me realize that that's not really how I see it. I think that, for whatever reason, he already had an interest in cutting up female bodies (long) before he started doing it. That might have drawn him to becoming a butcher or even a surgeon or any profession where he could use his knife cutting into flesh. The wax models may just have fine-tuned his fantasy or added something to it.

              Cheers,
              Frank
              Yes, I think we agree. The wax models may or may not have been an inspiration for JtR, we cannot know, but if they were, the fascination for them may have directed him to some occupation which involved cutting up bodies, so that by the time he became the Whitechapel murderer he was highly skilled with the use of a large sharp knife, and the possessor of a fair degree of anatomical knowledge. Or possibly, as say, a butcher/slaughterer he could have seen the models and then become intrigued by the human body. Unless I am mistaken, all or at least most of the wax models I have seen appear to have been female, and therefore perhaps more tempting to a twisted mind. Is this significant possibly?

              I have neglected to add a hunter to the list of potential suspects, as such a person who hunted, killed and then cut up the bodies and prepared the meat for cooking, might also develop similar skills - but I regard this as less likely.

              Comment

              • kjab3112
                Detective
                • May 2016
                • 206

                #22
                The anatomical models tended to be female due to the need to teach obstetrics. The irony is that one of the pieces of evidence against Kahn was that he allowed women to enter! I wonder if anyone knows whether eastern Germany, modern Poland etc still had similar exhibitions into the 1880s given the large number of Germans and Russian empire Jews in the area who may have seen and been inspired to display their work in a similar way?

                Comment

                • Mike J. G.
                  Sergeant
                  • May 2017
                  • 846

                  #23
                  I think Whittington Egan touched upon this in a couple of his Ripper and non-Ripper related works, but Liverpool also had its own museum of anatomy...

                  "The Liverpool Museum of Anatomy 29 Paradise Street, opened 1858, replacing Woodhead's Parisian Gallery of Anatomy, Lime St. Closed 1938 and became the temporary HQ of the Balloon Barrage Unit, Auxiliary Air Force Unit.
                  The exhibition was sold to Louis Tussauds waxworks in Blackpool, and remained there until at least the 1960's.
                  Before the internet existed how did people learn about anatomy and physiology, especially the sexy bits? Books on reproductive anatomy, including cheap, illustrated texts aimed at the working classes, had been available since the dawn of printing, but a more visceral and entertaining experience could be found in displays of hyper-realistic wax models. These originated as teaching tools in museums and medical schools during the early 18th century, and by the Victorian Era had made their way to the general public via private "museums" such as the Liverpool Museum of Anatomy, whose intriguing guidebook we recently acquired.
                  The Liverpool Museum was one of many similar institutions in Europe and North America that, unlike the exhibits of professional medical organisations, were open to the public and presented in a way that was friendly to middle and working class people without medical training. Though they advertised themselves as educational venues, particularly regarding reproduction and the dangers of sexual vice, these museums also traded on the shock or titillation value of their exhibits, and some were targeted by the medical establishment as purveyors of vice and quackery."

                  Liverpool Museum of Anatomy. The Liverpool Museum of Anatomy 29 Paradise Street, opened 1858, replacing Woodhead's Parisian Gallery of Anatomy, Lime St. Closed 1938 and became the temporary HQ of...


                  As I've mentioned before, it's my personal opinion that the murderer was probably exposed to viscera at an impressionable age, and discovered that he enjoyed it, along the same lines as people like Gein and Dahmer. It's possible that they then sought out any jobs which allowed them to be near such things, but then again, Dahmer didn't, so it's not definite.

                  Like Dahmer, Francois Bertrand began dissecting dead animals at an early age, then when he got older he began exhuming corpses. I wouldn't be surprised if our man tried the odd exhumation of bodies.

                  Both Dahmer and Gein were obviously left to their own devices and so they could indulge their perversions somewhat safely, so I wouldn't be surprised if our man was similarly able to indulge by themselves, meaning I'm not sure they were married or living with family at the time.

                  I know I'm not offering anything groundbreaking here, it's all been gone over before in better detail than I could muster, but when we see all of the reasoning given by authors over the years as to why Jack did what he did, from political agendas to black magic, cult activities, religious mania and royal conspiracies, I can never look at it in such a romanticised way, myself.

                  For me, "Jack" was only ever serving himself and his own depravity which he probably never even understood but had to give in to. I don't think he was particularly interested in killing at all, just interested in having a body to play with. IMO he probably began with animals and progressed to corpses, but did he begin by obtaining his own corpses or did he have access to some? Did his ability to access corpses come to an abrupt end and so he had to create his own? Or did he discover that the fresher they were, the better? Buggered if I know, but it's always intrigued me.

                  We always tend to look at Jack through the lense of the modern serial killer, when IMO he was probably more along the lines of a ghoul, like Bertrand and Gein.

                  Just my personal opinions, anyway, and like I said, nothing new or unique.

                  ​​​​​​

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X