Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Did The Ripper Remove Organs?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

    Well, he was only asked to view the body and match the apron piece from Goulston Street how long would that have taken?

    I was quoting the time from another poster here, but we know that he had not arrived at the mortuary by 5.20am because it looks as though a Star reporter had been waiting outside the mortuary until at least that time, In excess of 3 hours after the boy arrived.

    Out of the many people at the mortuary, none of them mentioned organs being found missing until the post mortem or any cursory examination of the body.


    www.trevormarriott.co.uk
    Brown and Sequiera were at the mortuary immediately after it was removed from Mitre Square. They watched it being stripped. Is it likely that they just went there to watch them strip the corpse? Of course not. They would have examined the body. They would have mentioned anything particularly relevant to the police who were present. They wouldn’t have bothered recording this because there was no need to as all would be noted at the PM.

    So…organ thieves couldn’t have known that these doctors hadn’t spotted the uterus. It was way to big a risk therefore they wouldn’t have done it?

    When did Phillips get the the mortuary? We can’t give a time but we know from Brown that it was Phillips who gave him the apron piece for comparison. So do you think it likely Trevor that…

    Long finds the apron at 2.55
    He searches the stair case and building then takes the apron to Commercial Road Station.
    So it’s reasonable to estimate that the apron was at the station sometime between 3 and 4.
    The police were clearly keen to know if the apron piece matched as it pointed them to the killers route.

    So do you really think that they would have been prepared to wait over 10 hours to the PM to get that info.

    Of course not. So…

    Phillips have Brown the apron.
    Phillips was at St. George’s performing Strides PM from 3.00 (probably before that) and so couldn’t have attended the Eddowes PM

    Therefore Phillips must have given Brown the apron piece before the PM, and when was Brown there? Immediately after the body left Mitre Square.

    Regards

    Sir Herlock Sholmes.

    “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

      Brown and Sequiera were at the mortuary immediately after it was removed from Mitre Square. They watched it being stripped. Is it likely that they just went there to watch them strip the corpse? Of course not. They would have examined the body. They would have mentioned anything particularly relevant to the police who were present. They wouldn’t have bothered recording this because there was no need to as all would be noted at the PM.

      So…organ thieves couldn’t have known that these doctors hadn’t spotted the uterus. It was way to big a risk therefore they wouldn’t have done it?

      When did Phillips get the the mortuary? We can’t give a time but we know from Brown that it was Phillips who gave him the apron piece for comparison. So do you think it likely Trevor that…

      Long finds the apron at 2.55
      He searches the stair case and building then takes the apron to Commercial Road Station.
      So it’s reasonable to estimate that the apron was at the station sometime between 3 and 4.
      The police were clearly keen to know if the apron piece matched as it pointed them to the killers route.

      So do you really think that they would have been prepared to wait over 10 hours to the PM to get that info.

      Of course not. So…

      Phillips have Brown the apron.
      Phillips was at St. George’s performing Strides PM from 3.00 (probably before that) and so couldn’t have attended the Eddowes PM

      Therefore Phillips must have given Brown the apron piece before the PM, and when was Brown there? Immediately after the body left Mitre Square.
      When are you going to accept that you are so wrong, your posts on this topic are fuelled by your desperate need to show that the killer removed the organs, of which I have provided pictures, along with modern-day medical experts' opinions to back up my theory, and still you doubt the theory.

      I have nothing further to add to this topic, and I am not going to reply to any of your posts on this topic because it's getting boring from my perspective, as I suspect it is for other posters.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
        When are you going to accept that you are so wrong....
        Nobody supports your theory. The vote is 23-0 against it because your theory is deeply flawed.

        "The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren

        "Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven Blomer

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

          When are you going to accept that you are so wrong, your posts on this topic are fuelled by your desperate need to show that the killer removed the organs, of which I have provided pictures, along with modern-day medical experts' opinions to back up my theory, and still you doubt the theory.

          I have nothing further to add to this topic, and I am not going to reply to any of your posts on this topic because it's getting boring from my perspective, as I suspect it is for other posters.

          www.trevormarriott.co.uk
          If you consider that showing pictures of where the organs are located as evidence of anything then that is sad.

          Your opinions aren’t worth listening to Trevor. I (and others) have systematically torn your theory to shreds. It’s an embarrassment. I’m tired of hearing from you. Everyone is tired of hearing your theories. You never, ever respond properly to any point you just clumsily blunder on completely devoid of logic, reason, common sense or even the remotest respect for the evidence. And you have the unmitigated nerve to talk to me as if I’m the one proposing a barking mad theory. Well unfortunately for you 23 intelligent people agree with me and you are left standing there on your own as usual desperately hoping that one day you’ll come up with a valid theory. You may have been a police officer but you are not a good detective.

          So no Trevor, your theory falls and it falls badly when we take a good look at the evidence. Its way past time to give this silly theory up and stop dodging issues, avoiding answering tough questions, obfuscating and changing the subject.

          The killer took organs. It’s a fact. Opinions to the contrary can’t be taken seriously. And as it’s 23-0, they clearly aren’t.
          Regards

          Sir Herlock Sholmes.

          “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

            By the way, do you still think that Phillips attended the Eddowes PM at 2.30, left early, and dashed across to St. George’s to begin the Stride PM at 3.00?
            The Stride autopsy was 3PM the next day.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by GBinOz View Post

              The Stride autopsy was 3PM the next day.
              Yes, I believe it was Trevor who thought otherwise.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

                When are you going to accept that you are so wrong, your posts on this topic are fuelled by your desperate need to show that the killer removed the organs, of which I have provided pictures, along with modern-day medical experts' opinions to back up my theory, and still you doubt the theory.

                I have nothing further to add to this topic, and I am not going to reply to any of your posts on this topic because it's getting boring from my perspective, as I suspect it is for other posters.

                www.trevormarriott.co.uk
                For what it's worth. The majority of these women were murdered not far from Butchers Row. There were 4 Kosher Butchers in that Row, Kosher Slaughterman and Kosher retail Butchers who bought wholesale according to strict Jewish Law.
                Why does that matter and is there any significance? The Kosher Butchers removed animal organs to examine them as part of their Kosher requirement. And yes they could have likely done it in haste in poor lighting as not all Butcher shops had gas lighting. So the idea that a Butcher was incapable is not true.
                if the question then turns to animal v human then I would look at Martha Tabrum, stabbed 39 times in the same areas that the next victims were mutilated. That sounds like a probe and the progression from animal to human.
                Tabrum.
                Assuming Tabrum was the probe, what happened next? An escalation in the mutilation and removal of organs with Chapman, Eddowes and finally Kelly, who was literally a human carcass.
                Chapman and Eddowes were similar in the removals. In the case of Chapman there was plenty of light for the killer to observe where the human organs were and since his hands were already in the body, to feel for other organs. He progressed 1 additional step with Eddowes and then carved up her face.
                Why would trained Doctors even mention slaughterman or Butchers or their knives after having seen these victims up close? Why would Robert Sagar state they were convinced a butcher who worked or did work with the Butchers on Butchers Row was the murderer? This was after Mary Kelly?

                Kosher Butchers removed organs for a living.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by GBinOz View Post

                  The Stride autopsy was 3PM the next day.
                  Thanks for pointing that out George

                  So Phillips could have attended the PM and gone to the mortuary earlier in the day when Brown and Sequiera were there.
                  Regards

                  Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                  “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X