Originally posted by lynn cates
View Post
On the contrary, Phillips is clear, he said the cut went round (around).
"...carried entirely round and again in front of the neck,". The relative word being "again", indicating a second time across the front of the neck.
In other words, completely around the neck 360 deg, with overlap.
However, Llewellyn is the one who is unclear. First he uses the term "circular" to describe a bruise, which tells us the bruise is round like a coin. Then he uses the same word, "circular" to describe an incision, which clearly cannot be shaped like a coin. He isn't describing a round hole, so we now are left to wonder what he was trying to describe.
Comment