Abby Normal:
Ok but what about the idea to throw off police by making them think it was someone who lived in the building? As I said the fact that it was found in a doorway could be significant.
It would take a very dumb killer to place a clue in the doorway leading to his lodgings, Abby. And it would take an equally dumb police force to accept that he would have done so.
Routinely, they would have checked out the ones who lived up the stairs - but they would not anticipate to find the killer there unless he was deranged.
Also, if he carried the apron along with him from Mitre Square for reasons of carrying the organs in it - why would he throw it away in the doorway and then balance the slippery innards in his bare hands the last few yards ...?
If it was a trophy - why throw that trophy away?
If it had been either of these things, the apron would not have been thrown away in the doorway. Of course, if he first took the innards to his lodgings, hid them there, and THEN went back out and threw the apron in the doorway, we may have some sort of logically working solution.
But basically, doing so in your OWN doorway or very close to it, makes no sense at all. And I can´t imagine that he set of for a second longish nocturnal walk, apron in hand, while the streets were swarming with police.
All in all, there is very good reason not to belive in the organ carrier theory, and an absolutely excellent reason not to buy the trophy suggestion either.
And for the life of me I can't really see any of the practical reasons.
For example, your bandage idea. He knew he would be heading immediately home and could take careof a cut there. And any blood would be seeped up by his clothes. If he cut his hand he could just stick his hand in his pocket.
Oh-oh! How can you tell that he knew that he would be heading immediately home?
I don´t think that he did. And I can point to a logical reason why.
"Any blood would be seeped up by his clothes", you say. Fair enough. But would a killer want his cothes blood-drenched if he could avoid it? Would anybody, killers or not, want their clothes blood-drenched if they could avoid it?
If you could prevent such a thing by wrapping apiece of cloth around the hand, a piece of cloth that you could just throw away afterwards, then why not do so?
And if he used it for a bandage to possibly stop a blood trail the police could follow, why would he drop it before he got home?
Two reasons leap to mind:
1. It had stopped bleeding.
2. The rag was deeply incriminating.
A combination of the two sounds an appealing suggestion to me.
And surely he would not drop it at his own door step where it was found?
Well, as you have seen, I would not propose that he would drop the rag close to his lodgings - on the contrary. My suggestion is that he dropped it very far from his home, but nevertheless indicating in which direction he lived.
Ok but what about the idea to throw off police by making them think it was someone who lived in the building? As I said the fact that it was found in a doorway could be significant.
It would take a very dumb killer to place a clue in the doorway leading to his lodgings, Abby. And it would take an equally dumb police force to accept that he would have done so.
Routinely, they would have checked out the ones who lived up the stairs - but they would not anticipate to find the killer there unless he was deranged.
Also, if he carried the apron along with him from Mitre Square for reasons of carrying the organs in it - why would he throw it away in the doorway and then balance the slippery innards in his bare hands the last few yards ...?
If it was a trophy - why throw that trophy away?
If it had been either of these things, the apron would not have been thrown away in the doorway. Of course, if he first took the innards to his lodgings, hid them there, and THEN went back out and threw the apron in the doorway, we may have some sort of logically working solution.
But basically, doing so in your OWN doorway or very close to it, makes no sense at all. And I can´t imagine that he set of for a second longish nocturnal walk, apron in hand, while the streets were swarming with police.
All in all, there is very good reason not to belive in the organ carrier theory, and an absolutely excellent reason not to buy the trophy suggestion either.
And for the life of me I can't really see any of the practical reasons.
For example, your bandage idea. He knew he would be heading immediately home and could take careof a cut there. And any blood would be seeped up by his clothes. If he cut his hand he could just stick his hand in his pocket.
Oh-oh! How can you tell that he knew that he would be heading immediately home?
I don´t think that he did. And I can point to a logical reason why.
"Any blood would be seeped up by his clothes", you say. Fair enough. But would a killer want his cothes blood-drenched if he could avoid it? Would anybody, killers or not, want their clothes blood-drenched if they could avoid it?
If you could prevent such a thing by wrapping apiece of cloth around the hand, a piece of cloth that you could just throw away afterwards, then why not do so?
And if he used it for a bandage to possibly stop a blood trail the police could follow, why would he drop it before he got home?
Two reasons leap to mind:
1. It had stopped bleeding.
2. The rag was deeply incriminating.
A combination of the two sounds an appealing suggestion to me.
And surely he would not drop it at his own door step where it was found?
Well, as you have seen, I would not propose that he would drop the rag close to his lodgings - on the contrary. My suggestion is that he dropped it very far from his home, but nevertheless indicating in which direction he lived.
Comment