Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Double Event Timeline

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Neil. Well, as I recall, some of her effects were out on the ground. Inspector Collard listed 3 small buttons, one metal button, a thimble and (in my feeble mind most important) the tin with the pawn tickets.

    Cheers.
    LC
    Some of her belongings Lynn.

    Similar to Chapman, no?

    Monty
    Monty

    https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

    Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

    Comment


    • same/different

      Hello Neil. Well, insofar as both had belongings ransacked. But Annie's was laid out in a neat pile; not so Kate. Annie had some worthless rings taken. What about Kate? Well, only speculation, but I believe she had a worthless letter taken.

      That is what I must now try to find evidence for.

      Cheers.
      LC

      Comment


      • A Letter?

        Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
        Hello Neil. Well, insofar as both had belongings ransacked. But Annie's was laid out in a neat pile; not so Kate. Annie had some worthless rings taken. What about Kate? Well, only speculation, but I believe she had a worthless letter taken.

        That is what I must now try to find evidence for.

        Cheers.
        LC
        Hi Lynn,

        I'll bite - someone has to. What do you think the letter relates to?

        Regards, Bridewell.
        I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

        Comment


        • blackmail

          Hello Bridewell. Well, with all due respect to my colleagues who believe in serial killers who wish to feel a lady's organs, although I cannot understand THAT motive, I do understand blackmail.

          Also understand a desire to kill the blackmailer and palm her off as a "ripper job."

          Cheers.
          LC

          Comment


          • Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
            Well, with all due respect to my colleagues who believe in serial killers who wish to feel a lady's organs, although I cannot understand THAT motive, I do understand blackmail.
            Thing is Lynn, there`s some evidence to support a serial killer who wished to feel a lady`s organs and none to support a blackmail theory?

            Comment


            • there`s some evidence to support a serial killer who wished to feel a lady`s organs and none to support a blackmail theory?
              Jon - I swear Lynn's got something...in fact two somethings is what he's been teasing us with (unless I'm very much mistaken)...but I reckon it only works if the C5 are C4, C3 or possibly less...Lynn's premise has to be the attempted blackmail of a serial killer who wishes to feel a lady's organs!

              Fess up Lynn!

              Best wishes

              Dave

              Comment


              • The Letter

                Originally posted by Cogidubnus View Post
                Jon - I swear Lynn's got something...in fact two somethings is what he's been teasing us with (unless I'm very much mistaken)...but I reckon it only works if the C5 are C4, C3 or possibly less...Lynn's premise has to be the attempted blackmail of a serial killer who wishes to feel a lady's organs!

                Fess up Lynn!

                Best wishes

                Dave
                Dave,

                I think so too, but I'm not sure where a letter fits in. I don't think Lynn believes there was a serial killer at all, by the FBI's definition at least.

                Regards, Bridewell.
                I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                Comment


                • Hi Bridewell

                  As you imply Lynn believes it's a C2

                  Dave

                  Comment


                  • C2

                    Originally posted by Cogidubnus View Post
                    Hi Bridewell

                    As you imply Lynn believes it's a C2

                    Dave
                    Dave,

                    By process of elimination, that would be Nichols & Chapman presumably?

                    Lynn,

                    Good luck with proving the existence of that letter!

                    Regards, Bridewell.
                    I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                    Comment


                    • By process of elimination, that would be Nichols & Chapman presumably?
                      Them's the pair!

                      Dave

                      Comment


                      • seeing is . . .

                        Hello Jon.

                        "Thing is Lynn, there`s some evidence to support a serial killer who wished to feel a lady`s organs and none to support a blackmail theory?"

                        In which case I'd be delighted to see it.

                        Cheers.
                        LC

                        Comment


                        • Having one's cake and . . .

                          Hello Dave. So both eh? Perhaps this is Ivan Karamazov's higher harmony?

                          Cheers.
                          LC

                          Comment


                          • serial unreality

                            Hello Bridewell. You are correct. I am not looking for a serial killer. Would like to get to the bottom of this, however.

                            Cheers.
                            LC

                            Comment


                            • This is my quest, to follow that . . .

                              Hello Dave, Bridewell. Thanks. Yes, Polly and Annie are the two. (By the way, my Isenschmid paper is in the next "Ripperologist," #125.)

                              The letter? Probably burnt. My evidence? When I:

                              1. Find out about that "notorious and unpopular character" who was meeting with a journalist.

                              2. Find out whom the lady was who "died a strange and violent death" after spreading tales on that same journalist.

                              Luck, patience and a bit of money to pursue this.

                              Cheers.
                              LC

                              Comment


                              • I'm in two minds about this

                                Hello Dave. So both eh? Perhaps this is Ivan Karamazov's higher harmony?


                                Hi Lynn...you're quite right...at a minute's notice I'll argue the toss in either direction...on most issues in life...call it a character defect if you like, but I call it playing the devil's advocate, (in that it tends to draw people out).

                                Also I tend to ponder long and decide suddenly...and arguing with myself is part of that logical process...perhaps that indicates schitzoid tendencies, but hey I'll let him worry about that whilst I get on with life!

                                Best wishes

                                Dave

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X