Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Serial Killers, A pattern???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Curious,

    If that were the case then there would be a simple cut throat.

    Strides death could work with it however.
    Washington Irving:

    "To a homeless man, who has no spot on this wide world which he can truly call his own, there is a momentary feeling of something like independence and territorial consequence, when, after a weary day's travel, he kicks off his boots, thrusts his feet into slippers, and stretches himself before an inn fire. Let the world without go as it may; let kingdoms rise and fall, so long as he has the wherewithal to pay his bills, he is, for the time being, the very monarch of all he surveys. The arm chair in his throne; the poker his sceptre, and the little parlour of some twelve feet square, his undisputed empire. "

    Stratford-on-Avon

    Comment


    • Originally posted by curious View Post
      If that were the case, it would seem to me that a simple execution would have been in order, but who knows?

      curious
      Hi Curious, happy new year,

      Polly Nichols was in Whitechapel the night she died. I don't think she had anything to do with a fire in Shadwell.

      Amitiés,
      David

      Comment


      • Originally posted by DVV View Post
        Hi Curious, happy new year,

        Polly Nichols was in Whitechapel the night she died. I don't think she had anything to do with a fire in Shadwell.

        Amitiés,
        David

        David,

        How can you be sure she didn't stumble across something or into the path of someone who was not supposed to be there?

        The areas are just 2 or 3 miles apart.

        Following is a quote from the Web site:




        For the poor folk of the East End there was not much by the way of entertainment to be had. If they could scrape the pennies together they could enjoy a drink at one of the many local beer houses, and there was always the Music Hall. But a good fire was a real draw, something the always gathered a crowd of spectators. One of these, at the Shadwell fire, was Emily Holland, who until just over a week earlier had been sharing a room with Polly Nichols at the Thrawl Street lodging house.

        Following the fire she headed back there, and along the way became the last person, other than her killer, to see Polly alive.

        end of that quote.

        If Emily were coming back to White Chapel from Shadwell, who knows how many others were too?

        I don't know that that happened. However, the deaths occurred when other major events were also occurring --- did they tie together? I don't know. Just observing here.

        curious

        Comment


        • Originally posted by curious View Post
          Following the fire she headed back there, and along the way became the last person, other than her killer, to see Polly alive.

          curious

          Indeed,

          They even talked, and Polly never said she had gone to the docks.

          Amitiés,
          David

          Comment


          • Originally posted by DVV View Post
            Indeed,

            They even talked, and Polly never said she had gone to the docks.

            Amitiés,
            David
            David,

            Apparently I'm not phrasing things so that you understand. I never once suggested that Nichols was at the dock. Just that she saw something or someone related to the fire that she should not have.

            If Emily could go down to the dock and back to Whitechapel, so could other people -- who knows whom?

            There was so much activity in that location, on those deadly nights, I don't think anyone can be positive they're completely unrelated.

            curious
            Last edited by curious; 01-01-2010, 10:21 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by curious View Post
              I never once suggested that Nichols was at the dock.
              curious
              That would have made the theory a bit less far-fetched, though.

              Amitiés,
              David

              Comment


              • Originally posted by curious View Post
                David,

                I never once suggested that Nichols was at the dock. Just that she saw something or someone related to the fire that she should not have.


                curious
                Curious,

                If she had seen the creator of the fire that night she would have no reason to suspect him unless she saw him in the act, also the perpertrator of the fire would have passed many women on his walk from the fire so why didnt he kill them as well?

                She wouldnt have been killed because of the fire.

                They arent related, most likely they werent.

                In my mind they arent.

                Yours truly
                Washington Irving:

                "To a homeless man, who has no spot on this wide world which he can truly call his own, there is a momentary feeling of something like independence and territorial consequence, when, after a weary day's travel, he kicks off his boots, thrusts his feet into slippers, and stretches himself before an inn fire. Let the world without go as it may; let kingdoms rise and fall, so long as he has the wherewithal to pay his bills, he is, for the time being, the very monarch of all he surveys. The arm chair in his throne; the poker his sceptre, and the little parlour of some twelve feet square, his undisputed empire. "

                Stratford-on-Avon

                Comment


                • Opeing up again for anyone whos interested.
                  Washington Irving:

                  "To a homeless man, who has no spot on this wide world which he can truly call his own, there is a momentary feeling of something like independence and territorial consequence, when, after a weary day's travel, he kicks off his boots, thrusts his feet into slippers, and stretches himself before an inn fire. Let the world without go as it may; let kingdoms rise and fall, so long as he has the wherewithal to pay his bills, he is, for the time being, the very monarch of all he surveys. The arm chair in his throne; the poker his sceptre, and the little parlour of some twelve feet square, his undisputed empire. "

                  Stratford-on-Avon

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Gman992 View Post
                    The Fenians were more or less a nationalistic movement, and would most likely attack Anglo-targets or institutions, primarily by bombings. Additionally, they would annouce their activities to draw attention to their cause. In fact, they would probably be hiding in the East End/Whitechappel areas, and that area would be the last place they would like to attract the attention of the Met, or, worse, Special Branch.
                    In fact gman we now have evidence that suggests that the radical arms of the Irish self rule factions and the Socialists were co-operating at that time...in the East End. Add that to a known Assassination Plot against Balfour probably being carried out using some local operatives....which was foiled in Europe by Special Branch/Home Office investigations....and likely the Jubilee Bombing plot the year before was planned in those neighborhoods. Anderson and some others foiled that one.

                    Seems Anderson in particular might have been involved in investigations beyond the capabilities and mandates of the Met or City Police. His appointment to head the Ripper investigations in that context is interesting.

                    Best regards

                    Comment


                    • Mike,

                      I agree, it is interesting that he was a big time fenian investigator and then was assigned to the ripper case. Although I would still say the methodology of the Fenians is extremily different that the murderers.
                      Washington Irving:

                      "To a homeless man, who has no spot on this wide world which he can truly call his own, there is a momentary feeling of something like independence and territorial consequence, when, after a weary day's travel, he kicks off his boots, thrusts his feet into slippers, and stretches himself before an inn fire. Let the world without go as it may; let kingdoms rise and fall, so long as he has the wherewithal to pay his bills, he is, for the time being, the very monarch of all he surveys. The arm chair in his throne; the poker his sceptre, and the little parlour of some twelve feet square, his undisputed empire. "

                      Stratford-on-Avon

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by perrymason View Post
                        Seems Anderson in particular might have been involved in investigations beyond the capabilities and mandates of the Met or City Police. His appointment to head the Ripper investigations in that context is interesting.
                        And the fact that he buggered off to the Continent on the pretext of ill-health, seemingly returning to his post only under apparent duress, is even more interesting - indeed, one gets the distinct impression that he only grudgingly returned from his sabbatical because he felt under pressure to do so. If the Whitechapel Murders had been perceived as something more "specialist" - i.e. as opposed to a series of grotty slum murders - then I can't imagine his colossal Ego allowing him to react in the same way.
                        Kind regards, Sam Flynn

                        "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                          And the fact that he buggered off to the Continent on the pretext of ill-health, seemingly returning to his post only under apparent duress, is even more interesting - indeed, one gets the distinct impression that he only grudgingly returned from his sabbatical because he felt under pressure to do so. If the Whitechapel Murders had been perceived as something more "specialist" - i.e. as opposed to a series of grotty slum murders - then I can't imagine his colossal Ego allowing him to react in the same way.
                          Hello Gareth,

                          Agreed. It was all a SD smokescreen. As is the way with the SD (CID)... noboidy is supposed to know anything. Andersom took that to extremes, and I reckon used those tactics when he had his JTR hat on too. Disinformation.

                          Nope, that wasn't a holiday at all. He used that "I need a break 'cos the Doc says I'm worn out" ploy to make it look legit. He went abroad to see some heavy guns, he was recalled from Paris, not Switzerland. And guess who was there.Some pretty big fella's in Fenianism. And we have evidence to prove he even tried to smokescreen that he was in Paris by saying someone else was there, which was denied by both that person and a third source. Disinformation.

                          Paris had been the centre of radical Fenianism for many years. Infact, going all the way back to the mid 1860's, we have letters to and from Top Fenian plotters in residence there. Anderson's ego was massive. So much so that he NEVER took responsibility for anything going wrong. And what happened with the JTR case? And who was in charge?... but did Anderson bite the bullet? Oh no.

                          best wishes

                          Phil
                          Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙


                          Justice for the 96 = achieved
                          Accountability? ....

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Phil Carter View Post
                            Nope, that wasn't a holiday at all. He used that "I need a break 'cos the Doc says I'm worn out" ploy to make it look legit. He went abroad to see some heavy guns, he was recalled from Paris, not Switzerland. And guess who was there.Some pretty big fella's in Fenianism. And we have evidence to prove he even tried to smokescreen that he was in Paris by saying someone else was there, which was denied by both that person and a third source. Disinformation.
                            I award that whimsical piece of conjecture 3rd place behind the Royal Conspiracy and the Pedachenko story, Phil.

                            Congratulations!
                            Kind regards, Sam Flynn

                            "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

                            Comment


                            • methodology

                              Hello Corey. Well, methodology differs according to what it is, precisely, that one wishes to obtain.

                              If one wishes to scare a good many people and get a point across, then bombs are an excellent device.

                              On the other hand, if one wishes to punish someone for passing information AND to serve notice to others within the organization not to do the same, then a particularly grisly murder (which, I might add, can be blamed officially on someone else) can work wonders.

                              There are plenty of historical examples of this. Do you remember the old "necklaces" used as retribution? Such things help one curb the tongue.

                              The best.
                              LC

                              Comment


                              • Anderson says that Williamson was sent to handle the Jubilee Bomb plot leads in France in 87, Monro says that it was Inspector Melville, and says Williamson foiled the plot against Balfour the following year.

                                Since both Monro and Anderson were the keys to the Jubilee plot being foiled, you would think they would know who was sent and who was in Paris the following year....since it again was Fenians.

                                And of course Macnaghten is on record saying at one point that the Ripper crimes were committed by Fenians.

                                Hardly a royal-esque hypothesis suggesting Fenians were on Andersons agenda even while he worked the Ripper crimes. Since he is hailed back from Paris, went he went for rest in Switzerland, ...worth questioning.

                                Best regards

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X