Originally posted by nugnug
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which Modern Era Killer Shares Most Similarity with Jack the Ripper?
Collapse
X
-
-
Yes, and just look at the mistakes that were made in the Napper case by 'professionals' who dismissed the very idea that the outdoor and indoor murders could be by the same hand.
I wonder when such lessons from recent times will finally be applied to older unsolved cases.
Love,
Caz
X"Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Rachell Nickell was murdered on Wimbledon common, which is a long way from Thamesmead where Robert Napper lived. Napper was visiting some kind of medical facility near to the common when he attacked Rachell Nickell and this event could be considered a crime of opportunity and is far removed from his established movement and behaviour on record which is all the professionals have to work with.SCORPIO
Comment
-
Well that's just my point, Scorpio.
The professionals don't know when to admit that they don't know.
Chiefly they forget that these people are not robots, just very naughty boys who can and will move around and alter any number of things that the professionals think they have 'established' about them from whatever movements and behaviour may appear on the record.
"By the way, coppers, this week I will be mostly in the Wimbledon Common area, make sure you update the record accordingly."
Love,
Caz
X"Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
- Likes 1
Comment
-
"The Monster of Florence took the genitals of his female victims but he is kind of like the Zodiac Killer in his targeting of couples rather than individuals like Jack
I've always found it interesting that William MacDonald felt that he could only kill in Sydney and that was the reason he returned there from when he fled to Melbourne after his last killing so as to continue killing.
I wonder if Jack the Ripper had similar feelings?"
Jack Daw, According to the F.B.I. profile of the Monster of Florence, found in the book The Monster of Florence by Douglas Preston and Mario Spezi, the Monster's male victims were incidental. They were just something to be got out of the way so the Monster could get to his goal the mutilation of the women. The profile also stated that the murders were were location specific. In other words the Monster didn't target couples, he would choose an area and then wait for the victims to come to him. Think of the Monster as a sider in a web. According to the profile the Monster could only kill in these comfort zones. If the Monster was to leave these comfort zones he would be unable to kill. If Jack the Ripper was the same way he would not be able to kill outside White Chapel.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JTRSickert View PostI'm surprised no one on here has mentioned Zodiac.
Think about it, people:
1. his identity is unknown, just like Jack
2. He wrote letters to the newspapers (although the Ripper letters are considered fake, they remain an integral part of the story)
3. Like the Ripper, one of the physical clues Zodiac left was a blood-stained piece of garment from one of his victims (which he mailed along with one of his letters).
4. Both killers were able to avoid getting a lot of blood on them from the killing.
5. All of the killings took place in public areas, out in the open (except for the Ripper's mary Kelly killing).
6. No effort was made to try to hide the bodies.
There may be other similarities but that is all I can think of right now. If I think of any in the future (or if any of you can), I'll post them.
7. Like JTR, the Zodiac killings just stopped. Similar theories are also attributed to this (he died, or was imprisoned for other offences)
8. Zodiac has his own set of canonical victims (7), but other murders have been linked to him both before and after the official ones.
9. Loads of suspects have been linked to the crimes, although not the numbers that have been linked to the Whitechapel case. However Arthur Lee Allen remains the only official suspect in the Zodiac crimes.
From hell
Chris
Comment
-
Originally posted by FrankO View PostI'd say Lucian Staniak (The Red Spider)
Comment
-
I think it is a mistake to look for the most surface similarities. Men kill prostitutes for lots of reasons. I think you got to begin by determining why Jack killed and then looked for parallels in motive even if there are superficial dissimilaritites. Of course why he killed is a point of contention so I don't think that we really can find the modern equivalent because we don't know JTR!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Witch View PostSorry for digging the old stuff, but this one is nothing more than urban legend, invented by the journalists from polish magazine "Zły". "Zły" specialised in gore stories about killers and other things and once they published a text about fictional serial killer. And then the story started to live it's own life.
Comment
-
I've said it before, and I'll risk boring you with it again :
Danilo Restivo.
-He murdered his first victim in a private upstairs room with multiple stab wounds, using two different weapons, and posing his victim with her lower half exposed.
-Hair stealing = organ stealing.
-His next known victim was killed in her own home, with a back story of 'missing keys', killed by one method (hitting her over the head) but then stabbed and cut about. She was mutilated (including breasts cut off) , trousers lowered and posed but not sexually assaulted.
-He brought himself to Police attention as a 'witness' in his own case
This killer was stalking women (he would have been a serial killer, but for the police following him), reading his own publicity, busy planning, stealing women's hair (organ harvesting), whilst posing as a 'concerned neighbour' of Heather Barnett.Last edited by Rubyretro; 11-24-2011, 06:42 PM.
Comment
-
Zodiac
My opinion on the Zodiac is that he was driven to kill strictly for the publicity. Apart from his first one or two victims his main goal was to see his name in the papers. In fact, he would write that if he did not see his letters re-printed in the paper he would be forced to kill more people because of it. The Ripper, it seems to me, was punishing his victims whereas the Zodiac used them as a means to get his name publicised.
Comment
-
The Logical Inference
Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View PostMy thought is that Zodiac happened too long ago to be considered 'modern era', which should reasonably apply only to the last 20 years. I must say there has never been another serial killer who was really comparable to Jack.
Yours truly,
Tom WescottI won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.
Comment
Comment