(apologies if there is already a thread for this - i did look but couldn't see anything)
It's interesting to speculate on the age of the man possible of committing the rippings.
There has been some discussion that 22 is too young an age therefore those suspects aged around 22 at the time should be considered less likely/eliminated from suspicion?
This would be in terms of people like Klosowski, Kozminski and Hutch?
I personally think 22 is old enough.
I came across this news story today, in which it is said:
"The jury heard the two defendants were now blaming each other but Mr Aylett said the crime was a joint enterprise of "unmitigated evil".
Mr Sonnex enjoyed using "gratuitous violence" and had a previous conviction for inflicting grievous bodily harm with intent for a stabbing he carried out at the age of 16, the jury heard."
full story here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8020498.stm
it's also interesting to note that this perpetrator was also accused of burglarly (in which he tied up his pregnant foster sister), arson, and the vicious murders of these two students (varying MO's, psychiatric condition, age etc all relevant here i think).
I think the age of the Ripper is up for debate because of the varying descriptons as much as anything.
any views anyone?
It's interesting to speculate on the age of the man possible of committing the rippings.
There has been some discussion that 22 is too young an age therefore those suspects aged around 22 at the time should be considered less likely/eliminated from suspicion?
This would be in terms of people like Klosowski, Kozminski and Hutch?
I personally think 22 is old enough.
I came across this news story today, in which it is said:
"The jury heard the two defendants were now blaming each other but Mr Aylett said the crime was a joint enterprise of "unmitigated evil".
Mr Sonnex enjoyed using "gratuitous violence" and had a previous conviction for inflicting grievous bodily harm with intent for a stabbing he carried out at the age of 16, the jury heard."
full story here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8020498.stm
it's also interesting to note that this perpetrator was also accused of burglarly (in which he tied up his pregnant foster sister), arson, and the vicious murders of these two students (varying MO's, psychiatric condition, age etc all relevant here i think).
I think the age of the Ripper is up for debate because of the varying descriptons as much as anything.
any views anyone?
Comment