Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How did JtR see in the dark?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    The killer did what he did. There’s no evidence of conspiracy or bodies being moved around. Therefore whatever happened to Eddowes happened. Simples.

    Nothing to see here.....let’s move on.
    Loads of evidence.
    All the seemingly impossible tasks we're discussing here are evidence .
    Unfortunately , because you have your suspect , you'll brush it off
    Your last sentence sums the attitude perfectly.
    There actually is evidence that it's likely Eddowes was dumped and it's in Brown's testimony , you won't see it with eyes shut though .
    You not wanting to see it isn't the same as not there
    You can lead a horse to water.....

    Comment


    • Originally posted by packers stem View Post

      Loads of evidence.
      All the seemingly impossible tasks we're discussing here are evidence .
      Unfortunately , because you have your suspect , you'll brush it off
      Your last sentence sums the attitude perfectly.
      There actually is evidence that it's likely Eddowes was dumped and it's in Brown's testimony , you won't see it with eyes shut though .
      You not wanting to see it isn't the same as not there
      I don’t have a suspect.

      No one has been proven to have been the ripper.

      There is no evidence at all. Not even a scintilla that Eddowes was dumped.

      She was killed in Mitre Square.

      To suggest otherwise is conspiracy theorist babble.
      Regards

      Sir Herlock Sholmes.

      “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

        I don’t have a suspect.

        No one has been proven to have been the ripper.

        There is no evidence at all. Not even a scintilla that Eddowes was dumped.

        She was killed in Mitre Square.

        To suggest otherwise is conspiracy theorist babble.
        "Conspiracy theorist babble" gives the game away that you're unwilling to evaluate evidence available to you .

        Had she been given an intricate tattoo after death , you would still be claiming the same .
        No matter what is pointed out , you will close your mind to .

        Read the testimony
        Think about the rain and the pavement
        You can lead a horse to water.....

        Comment


        • nothing worse than a closed mind .
          'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

          Comment


          • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
            nothing worse than a closed mind .

            A non-functioning one.
            Regards

            Sir Herlock Sholmes.

            “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

            Comment


            • Originally posted by packers stem View Post

              "Conspiracy theorist babble" gives the game away that you're unwilling to evaluate evidence available to you .

              Had she been given an intricate tattoo after death , you would still be claiming the same .
              No matter what is pointed out , you will close your mind to .

              Read the testimony
              Think about the rain and the pavement
              I dismiss nonsense.

              Make a case for the murder taking place elsewhere. Tell me where she was killed. Tell me why she was killed elsewhere and moved. Tell me who did it if you can or what type of person. Tell me why there was a cover-up.

              Call me an idiot I don’t care but you have not explained anything. You’ve dropped hints. You’ve insinuated. Give me the case in plain English using reason, logic and evidence and I will evaluate. Re-evaluate if necessary. As it stands I haven’t much of a clue what you’re claiming occurred.
              Regards

              Sir Herlock Sholmes.

              “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

              Comment


              • you'd surely know
                'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

                Comment


                • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
                  you'd surely know
                  I read the lines....not in between them
                  Regards

                  Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                  “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                  Comment


                  • No, you see the lines but you just dont understand them.
                    'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
                      No, you see the lines but you just dont understand them.
                      You couldn’t even understand Halse’s statement and when I clearly showed you that you were wrong you disappeared. You still haven’t responded. Perhaps you forgot to?
                      Regards

                      Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                      “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X