Originally posted by Sam Flynn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The word JUWES
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Rosemary View PostSticky fingers from blood might have challenged the writing skills of the author. Or is that just me because I'm left-handed & we tend to smear when writing on painted bricks walls with chalk & sticky fingers.I’m often irrelevant. It confuses people.
Comment
-
This thread assumes we are talking about a particular spelling of this word, when in fact we have 3 recorded versions of the word..."Juwes, Juws and Jewes."
If they were phoentically spelling the word when recording it, the first and last versions seem to fit best. The last version seems to be the most probable, to me, under those circumstances.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Michael W Richards View PostThis thread assumes we are talking about a particular spelling of this word, when in fact we have 3 recorded versions of the word..."Juwes, Juws and Jewes."
If they were phoentically spelling the word when recording it, the first and last versions seem to fit best. The last version seems to be the most probable, to me, under those circumstances.
They really did misinterpret the writing, didn´t they?
Regards, Pierre
Comment
-
One version at least --
Christopher T. George
Organizer, RipperCon #JacktheRipper-#True Crime Conference
just held in Baltimore, April 7-8, 2018.
For information about RipperCon, go to http://rippercon.com/
RipperCon 2018 talks can now be heard at http://www.casebook.org/podcast/
Comment
-
The killer was perhaps hastily retreating back to East End after a hectic night of double murders and, thus, might have had trouble observing proper spelling. Also, writing on a wall or any surface that is not perfectly flat may cause some letters to be illegible. The "u" in "Juwes" might have been an "e", but wasn't clearly written.
Comment
-
Is there any chance this issue has less to do with the writer and more to do with the reader? As in, the inspector couldn't read cursive.
If Orsam had posted his handwritten version of the word and told us. ,,the word is jews. Spell it as you see it,,
... most of us would have spelled j-u-w-e-s
... but one of would say ,,i think the third loop is an E. Its j-u-e-w-s.,,
As Orsam illustrates in cursive, it s all just a bunch of loops between J and S.
there,s nothing new, only the unexplored
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robert St Devil View PostIs there any chance this issue has less to do with the writer and more to do with the reader? As in, the inspector couldn't read cursive.
If Orsam had posted his handwritten version of the word and told us. ,,the word is jews. Spell it as you see it,,
... most of us would have spelled j-u-w-e-s
... but one of would say ,,i think the third loop is an E. Its j-u-e-w-s.,,
As Orsam illustrates in cursive, it s all just a bunch of loops between J and S.
Comment
-
Since both PC Long and his inspector agreed the word was "juwes" yet both still managed to write "jews" in their notebooks, it seems evident that whoever chalked the message on the wall meant to write "jews" but somehow wrote "juwes" instead. Obviously, a passing gypsy had placed a curse of mis-spelling on the wall.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pierre View PostOf course there is that "chance". But that does not mean that the written word had anything to do with jews.
If the word wasn,t Juwes or some version thereof, there would have been no reason to erase it. If it read...
The Martians are not the men who will be blamed for nothing
... they wouldn,t have erased it. Why? Because there wasn,t a martian market in the immediate vicinity. Apparently, the word was obvious enough to any passerby who could read cursive.
Also. Good chance if these men thought it read some version of Jews, so too was the populace that morning...Last edited by Robert St Devil; 09-23-2016, 07:01 PM.there,s nothing new, only the unexplored
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Robert St Devil;393459]
Hello Pierre.
If the word wasn,t Juwes or some version thereof, there would have been no reason to erase it. If it read...
What you mean is perhaps that if they did not believe that the word was Juwes or some version thereof, there would have been no reason to erase it.
Regards, Pierre
Comment
-
They did more than just believe, they took action based on that ,belief,. That still leaves us with "they", Pierre - meaning, a group of men who were smart enough to be constables and inspectors, standing about, reading the graffito, all under the impression the intended words was "Jews". If that,s what they read out of the cursive, more than likely, the neighbors were going to read the same word.
there,s nothing new, only the unexplored
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Robert St Devil;393508]
They did more than just believe, they took action based on that ,belief,. That still leaves us with "they", Pierre - meaning, a group of men who were smart enough to be constables and inspectors, standing about, reading the graffito, all under the impression the intended words was "Jews". If that,s what they read out of the cursive, more than likely, the neighbors were going to read the same word.
Comment
Comment