The Halse version

[lynn cates]

authentic

Hello David. So you see it as from the killer?

Cheers.
LC

[DVV]

Hello Jon. It has been argued that the GSG was merely a complaint from some Gentile who felt on the short end of a business deal.

Do you see any hope for that view?

Cheers.
LC

No.
And no, you didn't ask me, I know.

[caz]

Generally graffiti artists tend to go big & bold, as if shouting it to the world!
Not small & confined as if whispering to a mouse.

That's partly the reason why I don't see this small, neat, legible and complete sentence as the work of your average graffiti artist. This was no 'scribble'.

Another point is that all the words are spelled in correct English apart from 'Juwes'. How likely is it that any Jew who could write English as well as that would not be able (or willing) to spell the word 'Jews' correctly? Unless perhaps it was a Jew pretending to be a Gentile? Now that's a suggestion I don't recall seeing before.

The meaning, as ever, depends much on what the individual would like it to mean.

I wonder if Don Rumbelow still thinks the killer wrote it. He did a few years back when I was on his walk.

Love,

Caz
X

[lynn cates]

bad deal

Hello Jon. It has been argued that the GSG was merely a complaint from some Gentile who felt on the short end of a business deal.

Do you see any hope for that view?

Cheers.
LC

[Wickerman]

..... it clearly has implications for the author as Jack pointing the finger at 'The Jews' school of thought.

Generally graffiti artists tend to go big & bold, as if shouting it to the world!
Not small & confined as if whispering to a mouse.

[Fleetwood Mac]

Yes, I know, yet another wall writng thread....yawn.

Its confession time. The wall writing has many variations with the most common one, 'The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing" being the most favoured.

However, I personally take Halses version, "The Juwes are not the men that will be blamed for nothing". Don Rumbelow is of similar mind and cites his reason for taking Halses version as the fact Halse was at the scene for some time, and her also argues this version conforms to the 3 lines described.

Now I know Warren had it copied and to be honest, my conviction isn't 100%. Also, as some of you are aware, I do not feel the killer wrote it.

The versions change little but what I'm interested in is if Halses version is the correct one, does it change peoples interpretation of its meaning?

I'm just merely curious.

Monty

The former reads to me as: The Jews will be blamed because they deserve it.

The latter reads: The Jews will not be blamed for that which is not their fault..

The former by a gentile hand.

The latter by a Jewish hand.

In the event this is an accurate interpretation, it clearly has implications for the author as Jack pointing the finger at 'The Jews' school of thought.

[lynn cates]

double negation

Hello Stephen. Thanks.

The simple version is that Brouwer does not like double negation. He is right insofar as double negation can be used to convey certain psychological states.

For example, instead of saying, "It is likely that X" we may say, "It is not unlikely that X." This takes off the harsh edge of a criticism.

Cheers.
LC

[Stephen Thomas]

Logically, one need only count the number of negatives to determine truth value. For odd values, T becomes F and vice versa. For even numbers, truth values remain unchained.

Thanks Lynn

Ahhhh, it all makes perfect sense now...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brouwer_fixed-point_theorem

[lynn cates]

Brouwer

Hello David. Thanks. I am thinking in psychological terms--as in a Brouwer double negative.

Cheers.
LC

[lynn cates]

truth values

Hello Stephen, Robert. Yes. Logically, one need only count the number of negatives to determine truth value. For odd values, T becomes F and vice versa. For even numbers, truth values remain unchained.

Cheers.
LC

[DVV]

Hello Stephen, Ken, Jon. Although logically there is no difference, yet the Halse version seems to connote, "If you blame us, then we'll give you a reason to do so."

Cheers.
LC

Hi Lynn, excellent observation.

[Robert]

"I ain't never did no wrong" - that's a triple negative, isn't it?

[Stephen Thomas]

I'm constantly amazed at people here who don't understand the use of the double negative which is used in common English speaking for emphasis and has been for hundreds of years. As Spock might have said 'It's grammar, Captain, but not as we know it'. Here's Elvis with a fine double negative in the middle eight of this song.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNNYFdklVJI

[lynn cates]

connotation

Hello Stephen, Ken, Jon. Although logically there is no difference, yet the Halse version seems to connote, "If you blame us, then we'll give you a reason to do so."

Cheers.
LC

[Wickerman]

..... a frenzied disemboweller who had killed one or two women not a million miles away would not, I think, play silly word games.

And for those he think he might, then he had ample space and time in Kelly's room to scribble to his hearts content, but nothing....

Well, besides the FM, lets say


But to the question of the thread, Longs' version, which incidently appears to have been witnessed by the Inspector, who corrected his spelling, tends to suggest to me that, "The Jews will not accept blame for anything they do". Whereas, Halse's version reads like, "The Jews are not the people to be blamed for just anything".
So I think the placement of the "not" does influence the intended meaning, but in any case, the small size of the scribble is not consistent with a "hey, look what I did!" attitude argued to be the reason behind the writing in the first place. So, no, not written by the killer.

Regards, Jon S.