Originally posted by Scott Nelson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The meaning of the GSG wording
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by moonbegger View PostHello,Hello,Hello
Before the infamous message .. there are a few words that i would like to draw your attention to ( 1 ) Mettle { courage , spirit } (2) Bled { draw blood / obtain money by extortion . (3) Jah-Bul-On { Freemason god of the highest degree } .
The message scrawled on the wall above Catherine Eddows blood soaked apron read ..
[ The Juwes are not the men that will be blamed for nothing ]
( the movable [ Not ] makes no difference )
Using the same 46 letters , just re-aranging them , this interesting anagram rears it's head ....
[ Jah Bu Lon , mettle within Freemason gent , that bled Whore ]
Happy days
moonbegger.
Bizzarro."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Good Michael View PostMB,
The unforgivable part is that you actually recorded these anagrams somewhere as if hoping one day you'd be able to use them. Think about the madness in that.
Mike
Hi Mike ,
As a Great man once said ..
" Success is moving from one disaster to another , with Enthusiasm "
Ching,Ching,
Moonbegger .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
Before anybody runs to far afield with that, though, let me go on.
Originally posted by SarahLee View PostInterpreting your question as being about the literal translation of the words themselves and taking JTR out of the equation, then I have to agree that no.3 seems the most likely :
"The Jews will not take the blame for anything"
or in my mind
"The Jews won't be blamed for anything"
If JTR wrote the graffito, he may have had an interest in misleading the police into thinking he was Jewish, because after the Leather Apron riots, he thought the police would continue to tread lightly as long as they were looking for a Jewish suspect. Or he may just have been an anti-Semite, who in general did believe that the Jews "got away with (figuratively), murder," on a regular basis, and enjoyed the idea that the police were looking for a Jewish suspect, for once, ironically in a case where the culprit was not Jewish.
Now, as for the specific wording, the misspelling, and the placement on the post: I think that the writer is making fun of the way native Yiddish speakers speak English. Placing the direct object before the verb, overuse of the definite article, and double negatives are all characteristics of a Yiddish accent. Misuse of pronouns is characteristic of any second-language speaker.
So, instead of "Jews never get blamed for anything," you get "The Jews." A better parody would be "Not for nothing will those Jews ever take the blame," but I didn't say our guy was good. He knows that Jews say "the men" when they should say "them," or "those," so he constructs the klutzy "The Jews are the men." He gets most of his sentence in before the main verb, so it sounds right to him, even if it isn't quite right, and he sticks in the double negative. He also misspells "Jews," to insinuate that the immigrants are so ignorant, they can't even spell their own word for themselves correctly.
And writes it on the doorpost of the new Jewish building.
Comment
-
Originally posted by richardnunweek View PostHi.
I agree that there is a Jewish angle to the murders, and I believe that Annie Chapman was put to death because she was soliciting on the Sabbath, the same applying to Stride, however the killer could not satisfy his lust, so took it out on poor Kate, who was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
I therefore dismiss Tabram, also Nichols, and Mary Kelly as victims of the same killer, who were not killed on the Sabbath ,
Therefore I am suggesting that the graffiti was the frustration of the killer of Stride, in being disturbed.
'He who breaks the Sabbath shall be put to death''
Regards Richard.
I know Jewish doctors who work every Saturday night and Sunday in emergency rooms, and have a trade-off with a gentile doctor who covers Friday night and Saturdays.
Unless a gentile prostitute was very aggressively and specifically targeting Jewish clients on Friday night and Saturday during the day (Saturday night is not Shabbes), there is no reason that a Jew would care what she was doing.
More importantly, committing a murder is profane all by itself, and committing one on Shabbes, particularly profane, not to mention, if a Jew cared what gentiles are doing on Shabbes, he is making a lot of work for policemen and the coroner.
If a psychotic Jew, in some state of religious mania, wanted to murder women who worked as prostitutes on Shabbes, he would probably make note of who was doing it, and return for them at another time, but really, what the heck is a religious Jew doing prowling the streets on Shabbes? A religiously observant family will note the absence of a member on Shabbes.
Comment
-
Hi all,
Despite the fact that an earlier post seems to believe that this issue should be laid to rest, it is far from being satisfactorily explained.
What does the message mean? Well, it is written about Jews, in an exclusively Jewish housing project entrance, and below it on the ground a piece of crime scene evidence is left. Since there were 2 murders that night, (actually 3 throat slittings if you count Mr Brown and his wife), and the crime scene evidence is from the second murder...which had far less overtly Jewish themes..one might surmise that the message intended to Blame Jews for the first murder and also link it with the second murder by virtue of the apron section.
Why? Well its possible that antisemitic feelings were still ripe from the Leather Apron rumors and they suggested that a mad Jew was the Whitechapel murderer. By providing evidence from the Mitre Square murder a person might be intending to continue that kind of belief, inciting more bad feelings towards the Jews.
Comment
-
Exculsively Jewish Housing Project?
Good grief.
Monty
Monty
https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif
Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beowulf View PostThough there has been a lot of weathering over the years, paint, etc. still, it might be interesting to see what could show up if someone were to try a little luminal on the GSG wall.
UV light makes things glow in the dark, and a lot of body fluids, as well as teeth and bone fragments also do that, so if you are trying to find the blood spatter on a wall painted reddish-brown, you can turn off the light, and turn on a UV light. It'll help you find non-biological substances that glow too, which chalk might do, however, even if some remnants of chalk, or gypsum, or whatever, were to show up left from the graffito, there is no way we could differentiate them from every other glowing speck that will be there by now, plus, whatever may happen to glow in the bricks and the paint.
Originally posted by Michael W Richards View PostWhat does the message mean?
Graffiti then (and graffiti now, but then even more so) was a sort of text-messaging in many cases. Didn't that happen, if not on building walls, at least in the bathroom stalls where you went to school?
I think something came before this message, to which it was a response, and without having the previous text, we can't fully understand the GSG.
If the GSG and apron have any connection whatsoever, it is probably just that JTR paused to read it, and that's why he dropped the apron there.
Regarding the apron, and why he cut a piece to take with him: does anyone think it is plausible that he cut himself, and that's why he took the rag with him, instead of wiping his knife, or hands on it at the scene. He may have held it on his hand until it stopped bleeding, then dropped it, because he didn't want to walk into his house with it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Monty View PostExculsively Jewish Housing Project?
Good grief.
Monty
I debated how to phrase that Monty and considered Primarily.., but I believe that over 90% of the occupants of the Model Homes at that time were Jewish so I rounded up...not surprised you called me out on it though.
Cheers
Comment
-
Nor should you be.
So its not exclusively.
And you base this 90% on?
Monty
Monty
https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif
Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Comment
-
The Artisans' and Labourers' Dwellings Improvement Act 1875, better known as the Cross Act after then Home Secertary Richard Cross was an act where slum buildings were pulled down with new Artizan buildings replacing them.
Wentworth Dwellings were part of this process. No Jewish involvement, not built exclusively for Jews. Built for Common people.
So to state the building built for Jews only is not correct.
Monty
Monty
https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif
Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Comment
-
Hi Neil
Obviously I bow to your superior knowlege...but weren't the Barnett crowd involved somewhere in these schemes...don't know where I read it, but it lurks in the nethermost regions of my mind...perhaps it's to do with the Wentworth Street Arch...was that erected by the Four PerCenters perhaps? It's certainly before the Rowton Houses...
OK it's Friday night...I've had a couple of cans and simply can't recall where I heard this...enlighten me please mate!
All the best
Dave
Comment
Comment