I ain't never thought that Okies didn't have no culture.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The meaning of the GSG wording
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Steven Russell View PostDoes no-one else think DC Halse's version reliable?
Best wishes,
Steve.
Two pairs of eyes produced Lamb's version, against one pair of eyes with Halse's version.
No guarantee which one was correct, but the likelyhood of errors are lessened with Lamb's version.
Regards, Jon S.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
PC Lambs version Jon?
Monty
Monty
https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif
Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Comment
-
I don't think anyone noticed fella.
Of course, as far as I'm aware, Long is the only one who noted it down.
I wonder who provided Warren with a copy.
Monty
Monty
https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif
Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Comment
-
Originally posted by Monty View PostI don't think anyone noticed fella.
Of course, as far as I'm aware, Long is the only one who noted it down.
I wonder who provided Warren with a copy.
Monty
Halse did read his version from his own notebook at the Inquest.
The version found in the files, which replicates Long's version, could have been written at anytime.
JonRegards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Here are the versions, according to Casebook, of Halse's and Long's transcriptions of the GSG.
Interestingly, Long does not capitalize the w of "Will" or the b of "Blamed". Where do these capitalizations come from?
Also, if Halse has recorded the message line for line - and his use of inverted commas suggests that he may have done - then "not the men that will be blamed for" would have to be written quite small to fit in the brickwork of the door jamb (18 inches or so?). Give it a try and the largest you will be able to write will have the capitals about 3/4 inches.
Best wishes,
Steve.
PS Halse on the left, Long on the right.Last edited by Steven Russell; 10-02-2011, 11:38 PM.
Comment
-
Did the Killer Intend To Leave Grafitto At Dutfield's Yard?
Originally posted by Malcolm X View Postwell i'm guessing and with sound reasoning, that JTR already had the chalk on him before leaving home, the graffito was originally destined for the gates of Dutfields.
If it's correct, I would guess that the killer might have written a somewhat different message on the gates at Dutfield's Yard than on the wall at Goulston Street.
At Dutfield's Yard any inscription would have been right over the body of the victim and right there in the yard of the Jewish Socialist club, but the killer seems to have had to flee the scene before being able to indulge all his fantasies.
I wonder what he might have written at the Stride murder scene if given more time? Would it still have been a message that in some way cast blame on Jews, or might he have had a different message in mind earlier in the evening than he did later that night after killing Stride in the yard of the Jewish club, having to flee the scene, and then encountering, killing and mutilating Catherine Eddowes?
Best regards,
Archaic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Monty View PostOf course, as far as I'm aware, Long is the only one who noted it down.
I wonder who provided Warren with a copy.
In his Nov. 6 report to the HO, Warren implies that it was he who made a copy before it was erased.
'...having taken a copy of which I enclose a duplicate.'Best Wishes,
Hunter
____________________________________________
When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888
Comment
-
Originally posted by Archaic View PostThat's a very interesting idea, Malcolm.
If it's correct, I would guess that the killer might have written a somewhat different message on the gates at Dutfield's Yard than on the wall at Goulston Street.
At Dutfield's Yard any inscription would have been right over the body of the victim and right there in the yard of the Jewish Socialist club, but the killer seems to have had to flee the scene before being able to indulge all his fantasies.
I wonder what he might have written at the Stride murder scene if given more time? Would it still have been a message that in some way cast blame on Jews, or might he have had a different message in mind earlier in the evening than he did later that night after killing Stride in the yard of the Jewish club, having to flee the scene, and then encountering, killing and mutilating Catherine Eddowes?
Best regards,
Archaic
it's so dark back in 1888, that to mutilate out on the street is ok, as long as you have a clear field of view left and right, but right beside a busy club door is plain 100 % bonkers, you'd have to be brain dead to mutilate there.
the killer might be saying, ``i'm not a Jew, but the jews are responsible for me doing this, the types that frequent this club``
THE KILLER USES THE WORD `WILL`... this bothers me because back then they are already being blamed for everything.....this feels very spooky.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HunterHi Monty,
In his Nov. 6 report to the HO, Warren implies that it was he who made a copy before it was erased.
'...having taken a copy of which I enclose a duplicate.'
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Comment
-
I agree, Tom, but this wasn't a normal circumstance. It wouldn't have been normal for him to be at the scene. This was his call and he understood the implications of what his decision would entail. In this instance, I could see him writing it down himself so he could show that this evidence was preserved in some respect.Best Wishes,
Hunter
____________________________________________
When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888
Comment
Comment