the reason im asking is that the GSG could have been there a few days and nobody bothered if it was reasonably widespread.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
how widespread was graffito in 1888??
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ianincleveland View Postthe reason im asking is that the GSG could have been there a few days and nobody bothered if it was reasonably widespread.
Great photo, Rob - missed that one the first time round.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Graffiti might have been around since we lived in caves, but how long would the inmates of that Goulston Street address have suffered it to remain? As it seemed to incriminate jews - and hence it was removed - I imagine it would have been rubbed out by the occupiers had it been there for any length of time.
Chalk on a black brick fascia, partly open to the elements, I would imagine it would have a shelf life of several weeks before it became unreadable. Has anyone done any....experiments?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jez View PostGraffiti might have been around since we lived in caves, but how long would the inmates of that Goulston Street address have suffered it to remain?Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Of course, Sam, this is quite true. But the odd thing to my mind is that the police - having obliterated the evidence and been roundly criticised for so doing - would have surely welcomed any evidence that the graffito was days/weeks old before the double murders. They clearly interviewed all the residents in their search. But not one statement was forthcoming that anyone had seen the graffito before. Had only one resident done so, the police would surely have publicised it to prove that the message was not relevant to the torn apron. It would have got them off the hook. It seems they were out of luck with that one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jez View PostHad only one resident done so, the police would surely have publicised it to prove that the message was not relevant to the torn apron. It would have got them off the hook.
Only one policeman said the Gsg looked "old". Uncorroborated statement, of course.
Amitiés, and a nice night,
David
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jez View PostGraffiti might have been around since we lived in caves, but how long would the inmates of that Goulston Street address have suffered it to remain? As it seemed to incriminate jews - and hence it was removed - I imagine it would have been rubbed out by the occupiers had it been there for any length of time.
Chalk on a black brick fascia, partly open to the elements, I would imagine it would have a shelf life of several weeks before it became unreadable. Has anyone done any....experiments?
Yep, I did many years ago. I also observed som chalked graffiti near Puma court and Bruin Street.
The Bruin Street stuff was open to the elements and was there 9 months later, albeit extremely faint.
DVV,
Halse stated it looked 'fresh'. Though Id ask him what fresh means.
Monty
Monty
https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif
Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Comment
-
Originally posted by ianincleveland View Postthe reason im asking is that the GSG could have been there a few days and nobody bothered if it was reasonably widespread.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DVV View PostWhy don't you pm him, Monty ?
Amitiés,
David
Comment
Comment