Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Goulstan Street Graffito.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Goulstan Street Graffito.

    Goulston Street graffito. A brick is eight x four inches. Sergeant Halse stated: The writing is in good schoolboys script, 3/4 of an inch.The writing formed three lines ... To fit the bricks, and to scale, it would need to be placed similarly to this :

    Jews, Juwes, Jewes, Jeuwes, Juwes, Jeuws, Juewes or Juews? These were the variant spellings according to different author's reports. The mid-line scrawl caused confusion. Writing on a brick wall, with chalk, isn't likely to assist legibility.
    In this drawing I've used letters from Saucy Jack and Dear Boss missives
    David Wilson Professor of Criminology:
    'Connection, connection, connection. There is no such thing as coincidence when you are dealing with serial killers.'

  • #2
    I haven't seen many bricks four inches tall.
    Best Wishes,
    Hunter
    ____________________________________________

    When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888

    Comment


    • #3
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brick#...,_and_strength

      US bricks are typically smaller.
      My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Hunter View Post
        I haven't seen many bricks four inches tall.
        I think he meant when they’re laying on there side, like how they’re usually stacked to build something like a wall.
        "Is all that we see or seem
        but a dream within a dream?"

        -Edgar Allan Poe


        "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
        quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

        -Frederick G. Abberline

        Comment


        • #5
          I live in a house built in 1865. The bricks are 8 x 4 inches, although the length varies from 8-8.5.
          I can't believe I just went outside to measure a ruddy brick!
          Last edited by Callmebill; 02-22-2018, 04:43 AM.
          David Wilson Professor of Criminology:
          'Connection, connection, connection. There is no such thing as coincidence when you are dealing with serial killers.'

          Comment


          • #6
            Meh. Next thing you know, you will be writing on them with chalk to see how long it takes for the rain to wash it away
            It will than enter your mind that one side of the house might be more prone .....
            My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account

            Comment


            • #7
              ............. and was there chalk dust! Does it really matter? No
              ‘There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact’ Sherlock Holmes

              Comment


              • #8
                How does a message written with chalk, and with ¾" tall letters, in a dark passage separating an entrance to building and a staircase inside, with a obvious link to serial killer, lying right under it, become known as 'graffito'?
                Is it part of an attempt to protect Charles Warren's reputation?

                PC Long: The apron was lying in the passage leading to the staircase of Nos. 106 to 119, a model dwelling-house. Above on the wall was written in chalk, "The Jews are the men that will not be blamed for nothing."
                In a memo from Warren to Henry Mathews:

                Subject: 'The writing on the wall'

                '...I accordingly went down to Goulston Street at once before going to the scene of the murder; it was just getting light, the public would be in the streets in a few minutes, in a neighbourhood very much crowded on Sunday mornings by Jewish vendors and Christian purchasers from all parts of London.

                There were several police around the spot when I arrived, both Metropolitan and City. The writing was on the jamb of the open archway or doorway visible to anybody in the street and could not be covered up without danger of the covering being torn off at once.....'
                The emphasized text would appear to be a lie.
                Why has Warren been allowed to get away with it?

                The purpose of the lie seems obvious; it provides some of the rationalization for having stupidly ordered the message to be wiped off - because it is (supposedly) not in a camera friendly position. There is no other reason for Warren to have (falsely) claimed the writing was in the archway.

                There was no excuse for not temporarily blocking the entrances to the passage (outside and in), taking a photograph, or at the very least, having an official version of the message recorded by hand.

                Having the coroner attempt to resolve the differences in the notes written by police constables on the night, instead of relying on an official transcript, was embarrassing.
                Andrew's the man, that is not blamed for nothing

                Comment

                Working...
                X