If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Unfortunately Pierre has certain posters just where he wants them, one of which after I compared them to fish in a net informed me he was a "shark". Well perhaps , however, a shark swimming in a Goldfish bowl, going round and round. Would you believe the Dead Sea Scrolls entered the argument at one point.
I saw the scrolls and people argued over them as primary or secondary sources when they are just stories and not reality. These folks want to play this silly game and it's something none of us would have allowed our children to go on about.
Unfortunately Pierre has certain posters just where he wants them, one of which after I compared them to fish in a net informed me he was a "shark". Well perhaps , however, a shark swimming in a Goldfish bowl, going round and round. Would you believe the Dead Sea Scrolls entered the argument at one point.
Anyone who continues to allow this ape to play them like a drum set needs to leave him/her alone. Can't you all see that there is no Pierre? There is no suspect either. There's only a small, vain internet entity playing a game and using what you tell him, what you reveal to him, to build a case that really won't be finished until you all stop feeding him/her.
Donīt worry. I have spent fifteen year at the university.
Regards, Pierre
Not worrying, just trying to get a straight answer.
I'll do you the courtesy of answering my own question. My degree is Bachelor of Arts in German Studies (subsidiary subject was Linguistics) - University of Nottingham (1974). That wasn't too difficult was it?.
Now then, what degree(s) do you hold please, and in what subject(s)? It would ordinarily be no business of anyone else what academic qualifications you hold but, when you call yourself a scientist and attempt to belittle others for lack of academic achievement, you have to do one of two things:-
(1) Support your own claim to be a scientist or
(2) Look ridiculous.
Entirely up to you which you go for but your attempts at prevarication are looking increasingly desperate.
Donīt worry. I have spent fifteen year at the university.
Regards, Pierre
Still refusing to say what degrees or even what subjects. is it a BA or BSc or a Masters degree or equivalent.
And yes in my 35 years spent at 2 colleges both parts of the University of London I knew plenty of maintenance, catering and housekeeping staff who had all spent over 20 years at a University and were all more open and credible than the poster.
Of course he said:
"I donīt have a credibility problem since credibility is meaningless for me."
What researcher could possibly say this, none I have ever met!
Life is much happier when you open your heart to the philosophy of Pierre. As you know, following his methods, I have identified Jack the Ripper as a civil servant called Edward Fairfield who, I believe, prowled around Whitechapel pretending to be Bishop Bedford of the East End.
I mentioned yesterday that I have a data source explaining how this is consistent with Pierre's theory of JTR being a police official and as a gift to this forum and I will reveal it here and now.
Between his letters to the Times of 1 and 9 October 1888, Fairfield wrote again to the Times on 3 October 1888 (published in the Times of 4 October) using the initials "H.P.B." in which, showing his arrogance and contempt of the police, he revealed his cunning plan in its entirety.
As you can see below, the letter is clearly from the same person. It starts, as he always does, "Sir, - Perhaps you will allow me..." and makes the usual ironic prediction at the end, this time about another Titus Oates.
The plan he reveals is that he will accuse an innocent man of being the Ripper to collect the inevitable reward!!
Pierre has interpreted all the clues correctly pointing to a police official, such as the chevron on Eddowes' face and the letter signed GOGMAGOG (meaning "a protector of the people of London") although it has a deeper hidden meaning because Gog and Magog were two separate individuals and the killer was saying he had a split personality, being both Fairfield and the pretend Bishop of the East End.
Basically, Fairfield was deliberately planting clues which pointed to a certain police official. Eventually he would frame him to collect the large reward but he was foiled by the fact that the authorities never offered the reward.
Fascinating. Of course Fairfield was forgetting that Titus Oates, after being a perjured witness against the Catholics (this time possibly against the Jews/"Juwes") was eventually condemned to a brutal public whipping.
No doubt that might have happened (or worse) to Fairfield.
Life is much happier when you open your heart to the philosophy of Pierre. As you know, following his methods, I have identified Jack the Ripper as a civil servant called Edward Fairfield who, I believe, prowled around Whitechapel pretending to be Bishop Bedford of the East End.
I mentioned yesterday that I have a data source explaining how this is consistent with Pierre's theory of JTR being a police official and as a gift to this forum and I will reveal it here and now.
Between his letters to the Times of 1 and 9 October 1888, Fairfield wrote again to the Times on 3 October 1888 (published in the Times of 4 October) using the initials "H.P.B." in which, showing his arrogance and contempt of the police, he revealed his cunning plan in its entirety.
As you can see below, the letter is clearly from the same person. It starts, as he always does, "Sir, - Perhaps you will allow me..." and makes the usual ironic prediction at the end, this time about another Titus Oates.
The plan he reveals is that he will accuse an innocent man of being the Ripper to collect the inevitable reward!!
Pierre has interpreted all the clues correctly pointing to a police official, such as the chevron on Eddowes' face and the letter signed GOGMAGOG (meaning "a protector of the people of London") although it has a deeper hidden meaning because Gog and Magog were two separate individuals and the killer was saying he had a split personality, being both Fairfield and the pretend Bishop of the East End.
Basically, Fairfield was deliberately planting clues which pointed to a certain police official. Eventually he would frame him to collect the large reward but he was foiled by the fact that the authorities never offered the reward.
"No. I donīt have a university degree. I have several. "
but when asked to confirm:
Originally Posted by curious4
"I see. In?"
the reply
"You really are curious for a lot of things, arenīt you. I think thatīs an excellent quality if you are doing research."
Regards Pierre 26-10-2015
However before that date 6-10-2015
the following exchange took place
Originally Posted by Pierre
"No. Iīm a scientist."
Originally Posted by Shaggyrand
"Pierre, could you be a little bit more specific on that? Psychology? Physics? A biologist? Library science? Crowd-science? Doing some PAR or participatory monitoring? Just curious. I do not mean to overstep your comfortable boundaries or pry much."
reply by Pierre
"Torn between beeing rude and polite."
Simply evasive, Never going to tell anyone Anything at all
Maybe simply nothing to tell.
My bad I meant degree in any science field.
But that's just based in the horse twaddle he posts.
Leave a comment: