The GOGMAGOG-letter

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by Observer View Post
    Hi Micheal

    Unfortunately Pierre has certain posters just where he wants them, one of which after I compared them to fish in a net informed me he was a "shark". Well perhaps , however, a shark swimming in a Goldfish bowl, going round and round. Would you believe the Dead Sea Scrolls entered the argument at one point.
    I saw the scrolls and people argued over them as primary or secondary sources when they are just stories and not reality. These folks want to play this silly game and it's something none of us would have allowed our children to go on about.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • Observer
    replied
    Hi Micheal

    Unfortunately Pierre has certain posters just where he wants them, one of which after I compared them to fish in a net informed me he was a "shark". Well perhaps , however, a shark swimming in a Goldfish bowl, going round and round. Would you believe the Dead Sea Scrolls entered the argument at one point.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Anyone who continues to allow this ape to play them like a drum set needs to leave him/her alone. Can't you all see that there is no Pierre? There is no suspect either. There's only a small, vain internet entity playing a game and using what you tell him, what you reveal to him, to build a case that really won't be finished until you all stop feeding him/her.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Donīt worry. I have spent fifteen year at the university.

    Regards, Pierre
    Not worrying, just trying to get a straight answer.

    I'll do you the courtesy of answering my own question. My degree is Bachelor of Arts in German Studies (subsidiary subject was Linguistics) - University of Nottingham (1974). That wasn't too difficult was it?.

    Now then, what degree(s) do you hold please, and in what subject(s)? It would ordinarily be no business of anyone else what academic qualifications you hold but, when you call yourself a scientist and attempt to belittle others for lack of academic achievement, you have to do one of two things:-

    (1) Support your own claim to be a scientist or

    (2) Look ridiculous.

    Entirely up to you which you go for but your attempts at prevarication are looking increasingly desperate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Donīt worry. I have spent fifteen year at the university.

    Regards, Pierre
    It took you 15 years to get a degree? I've heard of the 5year plan, but 15? Wow.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Donīt worry. I have spent fifteen year at the university.

    Regards, Pierre
    Still refusing to say what degrees or even what subjects. is it a BA or BSc or a Masters degree or equivalent.

    And yes in my 35 years spent at 2 colleges both parts of the University of London I knew plenty of maintenance, catering and housekeeping staff who had all spent over 20 years at a University and were all more open and credible than the poster.

    Of course he said:


    "I donīt have a credibility problem since credibility is meaningless for me."



    What researcher could possibly say this, none I have ever met!

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Last edited by DJA; 01-12-2016, 02:37 PM. Reason: Wrong page

    Leave a comment:


  • JadenCollins
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Donīt worry. I have spent fifteen year at the university.

    Regards, Pierre
    15 wasted years, I can tell you that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by Bridewell View Post
    Several questions there, Pierre, but no answers. I'll draw the obvious conclusion. I note that others have very sensibly done the same.
    Donīt worry. I have spent fifteen year at the university.

    Regards, Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • JadenCollins
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Huh??
    Pierre's probably the baby.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Varqm View Post
    This thread has turned into 6 men and a baby.
    Huh??

    Leave a comment:


  • Mayerling
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    Life is much happier when you open your heart to the philosophy of Pierre. As you know, following his methods, I have identified Jack the Ripper as a civil servant called Edward Fairfield who, I believe, prowled around Whitechapel pretending to be Bishop Bedford of the East End.

    I mentioned yesterday that I have a data source explaining how this is consistent with Pierre's theory of JTR being a police official and as a gift to this forum and I will reveal it here and now.

    Between his letters to the Times of 1 and 9 October 1888, Fairfield wrote again to the Times on 3 October 1888 (published in the Times of 4 October) using the initials "H.P.B." in which, showing his arrogance and contempt of the police, he revealed his cunning plan in its entirety.

    As you can see below, the letter is clearly from the same person. It starts, as he always does, "Sir, - Perhaps you will allow me..." and makes the usual ironic prediction at the end, this time about another Titus Oates.

    The plan he reveals is that he will accuse an innocent man of being the Ripper to collect the inevitable reward!!

    Pierre has interpreted all the clues correctly pointing to a police official, such as the chevron on Eddowes' face and the letter signed GOGMAGOG (meaning "a protector of the people of London") although it has a deeper hidden meaning because Gog and Magog were two separate individuals and the killer was saying he had a split personality, being both Fairfield and the pretend Bishop of the East End.

    Basically, Fairfield was deliberately planting clues which pointed to a certain police official. Eventually he would frame him to collect the large reward but he was foiled by the fact that the authorities never offered the reward.
    Fascinating. Of course Fairfield was forgetting that Titus Oates, after being a perjured witness against the Catholics (this time possibly against the Jews/"Juwes") was eventually condemned to a brutal public whipping.

    No doubt that might have happened (or worse) to Fairfield.

    Jeff

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Life is much happier when you open your heart to the philosophy of Pierre. As you know, following his methods, I have identified Jack the Ripper as a civil servant called Edward Fairfield who, I believe, prowled around Whitechapel pretending to be Bishop Bedford of the East End.

    I mentioned yesterday that I have a data source explaining how this is consistent with Pierre's theory of JTR being a police official and as a gift to this forum and I will reveal it here and now.

    Between his letters to the Times of 1 and 9 October 1888, Fairfield wrote again to the Times on 3 October 1888 (published in the Times of 4 October) using the initials "H.P.B." in which, showing his arrogance and contempt of the police, he revealed his cunning plan in its entirety.

    As you can see below, the letter is clearly from the same person. It starts, as he always does, "Sir, - Perhaps you will allow me..." and makes the usual ironic prediction at the end, this time about another Titus Oates.

    The plan he reveals is that he will accuse an innocent man of being the Ripper to collect the inevitable reward!!

    Pierre has interpreted all the clues correctly pointing to a police official, such as the chevron on Eddowes' face and the letter signed GOGMAGOG (meaning "a protector of the people of London") although it has a deeper hidden meaning because Gog and Magog were two separate individuals and the killer was saying he had a split personality, being both Fairfield and the pretend Bishop of the East End.

    Basically, Fairfield was deliberately planting clues which pointed to a certain police official. Eventually he would frame him to collect the large reward but he was foiled by the fact that the authorities never offered the reward.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Varqm
    replied
    This thread has turned into 6 men and a baby.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
    sorry Gut

    but he did say long ago:

    "No. I donīt have a university degree. I have several. "

    but when asked to confirm:

    Originally Posted by curious4

    "I see. In?"

    the reply

    "You really are curious for a lot of things, arenīt you. I think thatīs an excellent quality if you are doing research."

    Regards Pierre 26-10-2015

    However before that date 6-10-2015
    the following exchange took place

    Originally Posted by Pierre

    "No. Iīm a scientist."

    Originally Posted by Shaggyrand

    "Pierre, could you be a little bit more specific on that? Psychology? Physics? A biologist? Library science? Crowd-science? Doing some PAR or participatory monitoring? Just curious. I do not mean to overstep your comfortable boundaries or pry much."

    reply by Pierre

    "Torn between beeing rude and polite."



    Simply evasive, Never going to tell anyone Anything at all
    Maybe simply nothing to tell.


    My bad I meant degree in any science field.


    But that's just based in the horse twaddle he posts.
    Last edited by GUT; 01-09-2016, 06:02 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X