The GOGMAGOG-letter

[Elamarna]

Hi Steve by
from the hints he has already given I can assure you there is no validity in his suspect. As serious consideration for a viable candidate-its already a moot point. Its just another crack pot.

Dear Abby Normal,

While i take on board your comment about viable candidates, It could be that there may be some validity (by this I mean the candidate is not someone who is at least plausible on the surface and cannot be ruled out in a 60 minute internet search,) towards the suspect, however I seriously doubt any to the theory which he supplies with it.
In other words he could name somebody who is not ridiculous by per chance.

Steve

[Abby Normal]

John he won't tell us, how many times has he been asked?
Ignore his ramblings and pseudo scientific comments and games. (He will get upset now saying he is the only one not playing games, and how we should all be ashamed of ourselves, well Pierre, PROVE IT! )


There is no point in discussing any points he raises without any evidence, which he will not provide, his interpretation of metaphorical, as he calls them, writings are not evidence.

He changes his mind all the time, he provides false information, be it on the profession of the killer, or the history of historical documents, he has demonstrated NO scientific credibility or competence.


He claims to be a researcher, but says credibility is meaningless to him. Must be the first scientific researcher in history to believe such.

He denigrates writers whom he claims have no academic qualification, yet he refuses to say what his own are or mention any work he has been involved with, as the researcher he claims to be.

There can be only a few reasons for that.

Either the poster has none, or to reveal such would expose his true identity!

If and when, and its a big if, he tells the World who is his "suspect" and no more of this nonsense "he is not a suspect", then the World can review and consider his theory.

The World will then decide if it has an validity.

Steve


because

Steve

Hi Steve
from the hints he has already given I can assure you there is no validity in his suspect. As serious consideration for a viable candidate-its already a moot point. Its just another crack pot.

[John G]

John he won't tell us, how many times has he been asked?
Ignore his ramblings and pseudo scientific comments and games. (He will get upset now saying he is the only one not playing games, and how we should all be ashamed of ourselves, well Pierre, PROVE IT! )


There is no point in discussing any points he raises without any evidence, which he will not provide, his interpretation of metaphorical, as he calls them, writings are not evidence.

He changes his mind all the time, he provides false information, be it on the profession of the killer, or the history of historical documents, he has demonstrated NO scientific credibility or competence.


He claims to be a researcher, but says credibility is meaningless to him. Must be the first scientific researcher in history to believe such.

He denigrates writers whom he claims have no academic qualification, yet he refuses to say what his own are or mention any work he has been involved with, as the researcher he claims to be.

There can be only a few reasons for that.

Either the poster has none, or to reveal such would expose his true identity!

If and when, and its a big if, he tells the World who is his "suspect" and no more of this nonsense "he is not a suspect", then the World can review and consider his theory.

The World will then decide if it has an validity.

Steve


because

Steve

Hi Steve,

An excellent critique of "Pierre". I wonder, though, if one qualification he might have is a PhD in pseudoscience!

[Elamarna]

May I ask, in what subject areas?

John he won't tell us, how many times has he been asked?
Ignore his ramblings and pseudo scientific comments and games. (He will get upset now saying he is the only one not playing games, and how we should all be ashamed of ourselves, well Pierre, PROVE IT! )


There is no point in discussing any points he raises without any evidence, which he will not provide, his interpretation of metaphorical, as he calls them, writings are not evidence.

He changes his mind all the time, he provides false information, be it on the profession of the killer, or the history of historical documents, he has demonstrated NO scientific credibility or competence.


He claims to be a researcher, but says credibility is meaningless to him. Must be the first scientific researcher in history to believe such.

He denigrates writers whom he claims have no academic qualification, yet he refuses to say what his own are or mention any work he has been involved with, as the researcher he claims to be.

There can be only a few reasons for that.

Either the poster has none, or to reveal such would expose his true identity!

If and when, and its a big if, he tells the World who is his "suspect" and no more of this nonsense "he is not a suspect", then the World can review and consider his theory.

The World will then decide if it has an validity.

Steve


because

Steve

[DJA]

No, I have more than one.

Regards, Pierre

5 year plans or 15 year plans?

[John G]

No, I have more than one.

Regards, Pierre

May I ask, in what subject areas?

[Pierre]

It took you 15 years to get a degree? I've heard of the 5year plan, but 15? Wow.

No, I have more than one.

Regards, Pierre

[The Good Michael]

Haha!

But just think what would happen to poor Pierre if everyone suddenly ignored him?

I dare say it would be too much for him.

Yes, but it would be wondrous to see.

Mike

[GUT]

And if people didn't destroy his idiotic horse twaddle other newbies may come along and accept it as unchallenged.

[Abby Normal]

Untrue. You can see how flummoxed and irritated people get. I'm only looking out for their health because I care.

Mike

Haha!

But just think what would happen to poor Pierre if everyone suddenly ignored him?

I dare say it would be too much for him.

[Abby Normal]

Hi Good Michael and Observer
I Find Pierre rather harmless and amusing.

the only egg is on his face, because if he's being sincere then he's just another wack job with a crack pot theory, and if he not then the joke is still on him because either way he's had his lunch handed to him more times then I have ever seen any poster on this board.

And the ironic thing is that some real discussion has come about by his threads.


So really who cares?

However, I do see why some would want everyone to just ignore him. Now that would drive him nuts! LOL!

But it's kind of hard to ignore a train wreck you know?

[The Good Michael]

What amazes me is the number of posters who want to tell others that they should/should not, engage Trolliere, frankly it's none of their business. If someone else wants to "waste" time on Pierre.

Untrue. You can see how flummoxed and irritated people get. I'm only looking out for their health because I care.

Mike

[Observer]

What amazes me is the number of posters who want to tell others that they should/should not, engage Trolliere, frankly it's none of their business. If someone else wants to "waste" time on Pierre.

And it's none of your business if posters want to point out the error of your and other poster's ways in engaging in pointless argument with Pierre.

[Observer]

It will draw to a close eventually. Still plenty of egg to be distributed on faces though.

[GUT]

What amazes me is the number of posters who want to tell others that they should/should not, engage Trolliere, frankly it's none of their business. If someone else wants to "waste" time on Pierre.