If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Why would an illiterate person have been more likely than a literate person to have said they heard someone singing "a violet plucked from my mother's grave when a boy" if they did not hear those words being sung?
You will notice that I asked the question if anyone ever saw proof that Mrs. Cox could read. The point was if she (or whoever made the statement regarding the wrong "Violets" song) could not read, it would mean they were basing their statement on a confusion that someone who read the earlier information would not have made.
Well, as it seems that the press seem to have been better informed about the song than the witnesses, I suspect the murderer was a reporter for the PMG.
The press is often used for the communication of serial killers.
Just because I do not believe in specific events in the past does not mean that they did not occur.
If we look at Cox's evidence, we see that she said she heard Kelly singing "a violet I plucked from my mother's grave when a boy" at about midnight and then, a quarter of an hour later, Kelly was "still singing" and then having gone out and returned at 1am, Kelly "was singing then".
I doubt Kelly was singing one song that whole time so she must have sung a number of songs. Perhaps "Sweet Violets" was one of them, perhaps not. There's no good evidence for it. The PMG was almost certainly confused due to the similarity of lyric. But, really, what does it matter? Kelly sung a few songs. So what?
So what, yes. And so you do not need to comment on it, since you do not care about it.
Well, as it seems that the press seem to have been better informed about the song than the witnesses, I suspect the murderer was a reporter for the PMG.
If we look at Cox's evidence, we see that she said she heard Kelly singing "a violet I plucked from my mother's grave when a boy" at about midnight and then, a quarter of an hour later, Kelly was "still singing" and then having gone out and returned at 1am, Kelly "was singing then".
I doubt Kelly was singing one song that whole time so she must have sung a number of songs. Perhaps "Sweet Violets" was one of them, perhaps not. There's no good evidence for it. The PMG was almost certainly confused due to the similarity of lyric. But, really, what does it matter? Kelly sung a few songs. So what?
I'm sure that if Mrs Cox heard Mary singing Violets from my Mother's grave, thats what she heard, its very precise. The provinance of the song is interesting,Will H Fox an American, stole it from Harry Kennedy who wrote a song called 'A flower from my Angel mother's grave' published in 1878 which made him a lot of money. The song was published in England, it was a sentimental music hall ballard .The Mothers Grave was a popular piece of sentiment in Ireland and there are many poems and and songs about Mothers Graves, the original song may even have been descended from an old irish folk song.
Will H Fox had great sucess on the Music Halls in the 1890s with a comedy piano act called' Paddywhiski' based on Padereski. He Published an advert in The Era in 1899 complaining about people copying his act.
I dont see what MK was singing has to do with her death though.
If you would interpret the lyrics from that starting point, with a perspective connected to the Whitechapel murders, what would your interpretation be?
For this question to be meaningful, don't you first have to establish that the song had any connection with the Whitechapel murders?
At the moment you seem to rely on a newspaper report but have failed to deal with the suggestion that the paper is most likely confused about what song was heard.
Even you accept that Kelly did not sing "Sweet Violets" so where is the connection with the murders?
David and Pierre, you are absolutely correct "Sweet Violets" does not mention a grave - actually the singer is possibly giving the flowers to Zillah who is alive. I read the poem more hastily than I should have.
Jeff
Hi Jeff,
Yes, the "I" in the text is giving the flowers to "Zillah" who is alive. And the flowers are dead. They have been plucked but still look up to heaven.
If you would interpret the lyrics from that starting point, with a perspective connected to the Whitechapel murders, what would your interpretation be?
Cox also gave an earlier time for hearing the song; 11:45 PM. In fact she goes as far as to say Kelly started singing as she walked through the door after saying goodnight, so there's a good chance she saw Kelly singing, as well as being told by her that she was going to sing.
If she was just repeating what she'd read in the paper she got the details surprisingly wrong. And perjured herself.
A non-literate person hearing the victim in a sensational murder may have been singing a currently popular ballad regarding Violets, might confuse the two.
Why would an illiterate person have been more likely than a literate person to have said they heard someone singing "a violet plucked from my mother's grave when a boy" if they did not hear those words being sung?
Leave a comment: